Moral de la RJ

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 41-50
PDF size: 137.08 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The objectives of the present study are: 1) to determine the relationship between alexithymia and depression to contrast if they both are related, although distinguishable; 2) to observe the relationship between alexithymia, measured by the TAS-20 and with the validation and clinical scales of the MMPI, especially in connection with depression and somatization, centering the analysis in the underlying dimensions; and 3) to establish if the relationship between alexithymia and somatization is direct or mediated by depression (indirect). It should be pointed out that all the psychopathological variables of this study are considered as features and these are defined by the MMPI but not by diagnostic criteria.
The study sample was integrated by 362 students and obtained during the students’ selection process of the UANL Psychology School. Alexithymia was measured by the TAS-20 and the psychopathological variables by the MMPI. The TAS-20 is a Likert scale of 20 elements, constituted by three orthogonal factors: difficulty in expressing feelings (DEF), difficulty in identifying feelings (DIF) and externally oriented thinking (EOT). Data was analyzed through the Pearson’s lineal correlation technique, partial correlation and factor analysis. The factorial analysis was done by the method of principal components with an orthogonal rotation Varimax. The criterion of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (eigenvalues over one) was used to determine the number of factors.
It was hypothesized that: 1) The total score of the TAS-20 and their first two factors (DEF and DIF) would correlate positive and significantly with depression, and that both concepts would be perfectly distinguishable based on the factorial saturations of the scales inside the components that arise when factoring the TAS-20 and the MMPI clinical and validation scales. 2) A positive and significant correlation was expected between alexithymia and the somatoform dimension (in regard to the scales of Hysteria and Hypochondriasis). 3) If the relationship between alexithymia and the somatoform dimension was direct, then the correlation would be increased, in some degree, when eliminating the effect of depression; consequently, the correlation between alexithymia and depression would be increased when eliminating the influence of the somatoform dimension. On the contrary, if the relationship were indirect or if this reflected a masked or somatoform depression, then the correlation of alexithymia with the somatoform dimension would be weaker than with the depression. Besides, the correlation between alexithymia and somatoform dimension would be diminished or would not become significant if the effect of the depression was eliminated. Consequently, the correlation between alexithymia and depression would diminish if the influence of somatoform dimension was partialized.
The MMPI Scale 2 (depression) correlated in a direct, significant (p ‹.01) but in a low way (from .265 to .199), with the TAS-20 total score, and the first two factors (DEF and DIS), remained independent from externally oriented thinking (EOT).
In the study of the factorial structures, the TAS-20 total score and the difficulty identifying feelings (DIF) appeared associated to a defensive style of low defensiveness and social desirability, remaining both variables independent of the depression and social introversion factor. Externally oriented thinking (EOT) was associated to the manifestation of an instrumental and not very expressive (masculine) gender role, not showing any association with depression. Only difficulty expressing feelings (DEF) formed part of the depression and social introversion factor. When contemplating the three factors of the TAS-20 simultaneously with the MMPI Scales, difficulty identifying feelings and difficulty expressing feelings were associated to a style of low defensiveness; externally oriented thinking was associated to a masculine gender role and low suspiciousness, remaining the three scales of the TAS-20 independent of the depression and social introversion factorial component. This data justify to consider depression and alexithymia as related but perfectly distinguishable concepts.
Once the factorial structure of the MMPI clinical scales was estimated in our control sample of 362 students, three dimensions were observed: 1) Psychoticism characterized mainly by a very inadequate social behavior; 2) Depression and social introversion; and 3) Somatoform related with conversion symptoms, hypochondriac complaints or concerns and adoption of an expressive and not very instrumental (feminine) gender role. As it was expected, the strongest relationship was with the Depression dimension. This first MMPI clinical scale dimension was related both with the TAS-20 total score and its three factors (DEF, DIF and EOT), showing the higher magnitude correlation coefficients (from .351 to .129). In second place appears the psychoticism dimension. This second MMPI clinical scale dimension presented significant correlations both with the TAS-20 total score (.214) and with the difficulty identifying and expressing feelings (.239 with DIF and .173 with DEF). The somatoform dimension (conversion symptoms, hypochondriac complaints and feminine gender role) was the one that presented the weakest relationship with alexithymia. This third MMPI clinical scale dimension had more explanatory capacity in the third factor of the TAS-20 (-.200 with EOT) and a little less in the TAS-20 total scale (-.145) and its first factor (-.135 with DEF).
In our sample of 362 students, alexithymia remained independent of the MMPI scale 3 (Hysteria) (with regard to somatization and conversion symptoms) and was very weakly associated with MMPI Hypochondriasis scale. Only difficulty identifying feelings (DIF) presented a direct relationship with the Hypochondriasis Scale (.111). The Somatoform dimension of the MMPI clinical scales correlated in a significant, inverse, but weak way with EOT (-.200), the TAS-20 total score (.154) and DEF (-.135). None of these correlations showed masking of depression. When the influence of depression was eliminated in the relationship between alexithymia and somatoform dimension, this did not diminish or stopped being significant, but rather it became clearer. In turn, when the effect of the somatoform dimension was eliminated in the relationship between alexithymia and depression, this did not decrease, but emerged even more definite. This shows a direct relationship of alexithymia both with the depression dimension and the somatoform dimension, being these two latter dimensions related to each other. The association of alexithymia is stronger with the depression dimension than with the somatoform dimension. Based on the given data, alexithymia cannot be considered as a depressive feature neither as a form of masked somatoform depression, at least in general population.
The association between alexithymia and the somatoform dimension disagrees with the expectations of the early alexithymia literature. A direct association was expected. Nevertheless, an inverse correlation was obtained. The more definie the features of externally oriented thinking are, the higher the score in the TAS-20 is, or the more difficult it is to express feelings; the less conversion symptoms, hypochondriac complaints and feminine manifestation of the gender role will shown by the subjects. These results are in agreement with those of other recent studies that were done in clinical population.
The fact that both, the TAS20 total punctuation and the difficulty identifying feelings, in the factorial analyses, conform a dimension of defensive style with affective isolation and negation of conflicts and problems, gives more support to this result.
From the results of this study that was carried out in a 362 university students’ non-clinic sample, one can affirm that alexithymia (measured by the TAS-20) and depression (measured by the MMPI) are two variables that are correlated in a significant, direct and moderately low way; being two clearly distinguishable concepts because of their form of grouping in the factorial analyses. Alexithymia is related especially with a defensive style of scarce defensiveness and low social desirability. Their relationship with the Somatoform dimension (in regard to conversion, hypochondriac complaints and adoption of an expressive and not very instrumental gender role) is significant, inverse, weak and very lightly attenuated by depression. The more alexithymic the subjects seem to be, the less conversion symptoms, somatization complaints, and hypochondria they will have, and they will show a more definitive masculinity in performing their gender role. In general, the results are consistent with the idea that alexithymia cannot be reduced to a depressive feature and even less to a feature of masked or somatoform depression, at least in non clinic university student population.

REFERENCES

1. BAGBY RM, PARKER JDA, TAYLOR GJ: The twenty-item Toronto alexithymia scale-I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res, 38(1):2332, 1994.

2. FUKUNISHI I, HOSAKA T, AOKI T, AZEKAWA T y cols.: Criterion-related validity of diagnostic criteria for alexithymia in a general hospital psychiatric setting. Psychother Psychosom, 65(2):82-85, 1996.

3. GOMEZ L, MAQUEO E: Uso e Interpretación del MMPI-2 en Español. Manual Moderno, México, 2003.

4. HATHAWAY SR, MCKINLEY J: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: Manual for Administration and Scoring. Psychological Corporation, Nueva York, 1967.

5. HENDRYX MS,HAVILAND MG,SHAW DG:Dimensions of alexithymia and their relationships to anxiety and depression. J Pers Assess, 56:227-237, 1991.

6. HONKALAMPI K, HINTIKKA J, TANSKANEN A, LETHONEN J y cols.: Depression is strongly associated with alexithymia in the general population. J Psychosom Res, 48:99104, 2000.

7. HONKALAMPI K, SAARINEN P, HINTIKKA J, VIRTANEN V y cols.: Factors associated with alexithymia in patients suffering from depression. Psychother Psychosom, 68:270-275, 1999.

8. LUMINET O, BAGBY RM, TAYLOR GJ: An evaluation of the absolute and relative stability of alexithymia in patients with major depression. Psychother Psychosom, 70:254-260, 2001.

9. NEMIAH JC, SIFNEOS PE: Affect and fantasy in patients with psychosomatic disorders. En: Hill OW (ed.): Modern Trends in Psychosomatic Medicine. Butterworths, 2:26-34, Londres, 1970.

10. NUÑEZ R: Aplicación del Inventario Multifásico de la Personalidad (MMPI). Editorial Manual Moderno, México, 1979.

11. PARKER JD, BAGBY RM, TAYLOR GJ: Alexithymia and depression: distinct or overlapping constructs? Compr Psychiatry, 32:387–94, 1991.

12. PEREZ-RINCON H, CORTES J, ORTIZ LEON S, PEÑA J y cols.: Validación y estandarización de la versión española de la Escala Modificada de Alexitimia de Toronto. Salud Mental, 20(3):30-34, 1997.

13. SANCHEZ A, BORGES A: Transformación Z de Fisher para la determinación de intervalos de confianza del coeficiente de correlación de Pearson. Psicothema, 17(1):148-153, 2005.

14. TAYLOR GJ: Alexithymia: concept, measurement, and implications for treatment. Am J Psychiatry, 141:725-732, 1984.

15. TAYLOR GJ, PARKER JDA, BAGBY RM, ACKLIN MW: Alexithymia and somatic complaints in psychiatric outpatients. J Psychosom Res, 36(5):417-424, 1992.

16. TAYLOR GJ, BAGBY RM, PARKER JDA: Disorders of affect regulation: Alexithymia in medical and psychiatric illness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.

17. WISE TN, JANI NN, KASS E, SONNENSCHEIN K, MANN LS: Alexithymia: Relationship to severity of medical illness and depression. Psychother Psychosom, 50:68-71, 1988.

18. WISE TN, MANN LS, MITCHELL JD: Secondary alexithymia: An empirical validation. Compr Psychiatry, 31:284-288, 1990.