medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Pediatría

2006, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Acta Pediatr Mex 2006; 27 (4)

Correlation of the developmental conduct profile with the Bayley’s II infantile development scale

Bolaños MCH, Golombek L, Márquez A, de la Riva M, Sánchez GCE, Gutiérrez GO, Pereztejada HE

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 190-199
PDF size: 344.03 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The correlation validity study between the Profile of Developmental Conducts Revised (PCD-R in Spanish) and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-II) is presented.
Methodology: 40 children between 1 and 42 months of age were evaluated with both tests. Several statistical analyses were done including: descriptive analysis, a Pearson Correlation, a sensitivity and specificity analysis, and a positive and negative predictive value. In order to make these analyses the PCD-R was regrouped in accordance with the BSID-II scales.
Results: A positive and statistically significant correlation was found between the PCD-R and the BSID-II in the mental and motor subscales, showing that both instruments measure similar constructs in these areas. It was demonstrated as well, that the PCD-R’s areas correlated between each other and with each subscale of the BSID-II.


REFERENCES

  1. Meisels SJ, Provence S. Screening Assessment. Guidelines for Identifying Young Disabled and Developmentally Vulnerable Children and their Families. Washington, DC: Zero to Three/National Center for Clinical Infant Programs 1989

  2. Kaminer R, Jedrysek E. Early identification of developmental disabilities. Pediatr Ann 1982;11:427-37

  3. Dworkin PH. Developmental screening: still expecting the impossible? Pediatrics 1992;89:1253-5

  4. American Academy of Pediatrics. Screening infants and young children of developmental disabilities (RE9414). Pediatrics 1994;93(5):863-5

  5. Bolaños MC. Identificación Temprana de Indicadores de Riesgo Asociados con Problemas de Atención, Integración Sensorial y Aprendizaje. (Artículo pendiente)

  6. Domino G. Psychological Testing. An Introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall 2000.

  7. Achenbach T. Investigaciones en psicología del desarrollo. El Manual Moderno, México 1981.

  8. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverly Hills, Calif. Sage 1979.

  9. Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality. Criteria for Determining Disability in Speech and Language Disorders. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment 2002.

  10. Hernández Lara C. Diseño, Validez y Confiabilidad del Perfil de Conductas de Desarrollo. Un Instrumento para la Detección Temprana de Retrasos y Alteraciones del Desarrollo. Tesis para obtener el Grado de Doctor de la Universidad Iberoamericana. 1997 Posteriormente se publicó parte de la tesis como: Bolaños C. Perfil de Conductas de desarrollo, México; Universidad Iberoamericana e Instituto de Terapia Ocupacional 1997

  11. Bolaños MC, Estudios de validación del Perfil de Conductas de Desarrollo (PCD) como instrumento para evaluar el desarrollo de los niños de 0 – 4 años. Bol Med Hosp Infant Méx 2003;60:79-89

  12. Frankenburg WK, Denver Developmental Screening Test . Ladoca Project . Denver : Ladoca Proyect and Publising Foundation; 1967. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1991 (Pub L No. 102-119) Stevenson J. Predictive value of speech and language screening. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1984;26:528-538 Glascoe FP, Byrne KE, Ashford LG, Johnson KL, Chang B, Strickland B. Accuracy of the Denver-II in developmental screening. Pediatrics. 1992;89:1221-1225

  13. Berrum H. Escala de desarrollo psicomotor del niño mexicano, México. IMSS 1975.

  14. Brunet, Lezine, (1951). El Desarrollo Psicológico de la Primera infancia. 8. Coplan J, Gleason JR, Ryan R, Burke MG, Williams ML. Validation of an early language milestone scale in a high-risk population. Pediatrics. 1982;70:677-683 Frankenburg WK, Dodds J, Archer P, Shapiro H, Bresnick B. Denver-II Screening Manual. Denver, CO: Denver Developmental Materials, Inc. 1990.

  15. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York, NY McGraw-Hill Inc. 1994

  16. Cronbach LJ. Essentials of Psychological Testing. 5th ed. New York, NY Harper Collins Pub. Inc. 1990.

  17. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II, San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace & Co. 1993.

  18. Reigelman R. Herzh R. Studying a study and testing a test, Boston. Little Brown & Co. 1989.

  19. Hellbrugge T. Diagnóstico Funcional del Desarrollo durante el Primer Año de Vida. Ed. Marfil, España 1980.

  20. Honzig MP. Value and Limitation of Infant Tests An Overview. En: Lewis M. Origins of Intelligence Infancy and Early Chieldhood. New York Prenium. 1976.

  21. Parker K, Mainalnd M, Andur J. The diagnostic inventory for screening children. Psychometric, factor and validity analysis. Can J Beh Sci 1990;22(4):361-76

  22. Siegal L. Infant Tests as predictor of cognitive and language development at 2 years. Child Devel 1981;52:545-57.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com