medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2006, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2006; 48 (S1)

Fiscal policy and tobacco control: A unique opportunity to benefit public health and the public treasury

Armendares PE, Reynales SLM

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 167-172
PDF size: 82.24 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Various studies and analyses show that an increase in tobacco prices through taxation is one of the most efficient tools in the application of integral policies in the fight against tobacco. Increases in taxes contribute to cessation, to reductions in consumption and in the number of deaths among addicts and to decrease the number of people who start to smoke. However, many governments hesitate to apply high taxes to tobacco for fear of possible negative economic results including loss of jobs and a decrease in fiscal revenue as a consequence of smuggling. Both literature and empirical experience indicate that these negative consequences do not occur or have been overestimated, often due to arguments promoted by the tobacco industry itself. Increases in tobacco taxes result in greater fiscal income, even in the presence of smuggling, which can be confronted without eroding tobacco control policies. Numerous countries, including Mexico, still have a wide margin for increasing tobacco taxes, and thereby to take advantage of an exceptional opportunity that benefits both the population’s health and the public treasury. To do so, governments must stand up to the powerful tobacco industry, which is aware of the efficiency of taxes to combat tobacco use and therefore resorts to intense ad campaigns, political lobbying and negotiation of voluntary agreements for “self-regulation” in order to avoid stricter legislative or fiscal measures.


REFERENCES

  1. Chaloupka FJ, Hu T, Warner KE, Jacobs R, Yurekli A. The taxation of tobacco products En: Tobacco control in developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000:238- 272.

  2. Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP. The economics of smoking. En: Handbook of Health Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000:1539-1627.

  3. Emery S, White MM, Gilpin EA, Pierce JP. Was there significant tax evasion after the 1999 50 cent per pack cigarette tax increase in California? Tob Control 2002;11:130-134.

  4. Gilbert A, Cornuz J. Which are the most effective and cost-effective interventions for tobacco control? To what extent does an increase in tobacco prices lead to a significant reduction in consumption? What other possible implications will an increase of tobacco prices have? WHO Regional Office for Europe, Health Evidence Network, Copenhagen, 2003.

  5. Valdés-Salgado R, Hernández-Ávila M, Sepúlveda Amor J. El consumo de tabaco en la región americana: Elementos para un programa de acción. Salud Publica Mex 2002;44 suppl 1:S125-S135.

  6. World Bank. Curbing the epidemic: Governments and Economics of Tobacco Control. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1999.

  7. Sesma-Vázquez S, Campuzano-Rincón JC, Carreón-Rodríguez VG, Knaul F, López-Antuñano FJ, Hernández-Ávila M. El comportamiento de la demanda de tabaco en México: 1992-1998. Salud Publica Mex 2002;44 suppl 1:S82–S92.

  8. Canadian Cancer Society, Non-Smokers’ Rights Association and Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada, Quebec Coalition for Tobacco Control (1999). Surveying the Damage: Cut-rate Tobacco Products and Public Health in the 1990s. Ottawa: Canadian Cancer Society, 1999

  9. Lynch BS, Bonnie RJ. Tobacco Taxation in the United States. En: Growing up tobacco free: preventing nicotine addiction in children and youths. Washington: National Academy Press, 1994.

  10. Philip Morris International Document. Smoking and health initiatives. Bates No. 2023268329-49. Minnesota: Tobacco document depository, 1995.

  11. Guindon GE, Tobin S, Yach D. Trends and affordability of cigarette prices: ample room for tax increases and related health gains. Tob Control 2002;11:35-43.

  12. Warner KE. The economics of tobacco: myths and realities. Tob control, 2000;9:78-89.

  13. Jha P, Chaloupka FJ, Ross H, Czart C. Tobacco control in developing countries. Development Bulletin 2001;54:16.

  14. Ley del Impuesto Especial sobre Producción y Servicios (IEPS),

  15. 1992-2005. Información disponibles en http://www.sat.gob.mx.

  16. Ley de Ingresos de la federación, 2000 - 2005. Información disponibles en http://www.shcp.gob.mx

  17. Joossens L, Chaloupka FJ, Merriman D, Yurekli A. Issues in the Smuggling of Tobacco Products. En: Tobacco control in developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000: 394-406

  18. Thorne S. Higher cigarette taxes will spawn smuggling, industry predicts. Ottawa: The Canadian Press, 2000.

  19. Tobacco companies linked to criminal organizations in lucrative cigarette smoking. Washington: International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), 2001.

  20. Joossens L, Raw M. Turning off the tap. An update on cigarette smuggling in the UK and Sweden with recommendations to control smuggling. A report for the Cancer Research Campaign and Folkhalsoinstitutet. London and Stockholm, Cancer Research Campaign and Folkhalsoinstitutet, 2002 Información disponible: http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/publicpolicy/briefings/prevention/tobaccocontrol/smuggling/

  21. Campbell D. Lost in transit. International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), 2004 Información disponible en: www.newint.org/issue369/lost.htm.

  22. Joossens L, Raw M. Cigarette smuggling in Europe: who really benefits? Tob Control 1998;7:66-71.

  23. Warner KE. What’s a cigarette company to do? Am J Public Health. 2002; 92:897-900.

  24. Sesma- Vásquez S, Pérez-Rico R, Puentes-Rosa E, Valdés-Salgado R. El precio como determinante del consumo de Tabaco en México:

  25. 1994-2002. En: Primer informe sobre combate al tabaquismo. México ante el convenio Marco para el Control del Tabaco. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2005: 125-132.

  26. Mulvey K. Challenging tobacco transnational: Infact’s Kraft boycott. Tobacco and development: critical issues for the 21st century. Development Bulletin 2001;54:29.

  27. Mackay J. The tobacco epidemic: some future scenarios. Asian Consultancy on Tobacco control Hong Kong, Development Bulletin 2001;54:19.

  28. International Tax & Investment Center and Oxford Economic Forecasting. Special Report: The Affordability of Cigarettes in ASEAN Countries: Implications for Tax Policy. International Tax & Investment Center, 2005.

  29. Alamar B, Mahmoud L, Glantz SA. Cigarette Smuggling in California: Fact and Fiction. San Francisco: Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, 2003.

  30. Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS). La rentabilidad a costa de la gente: actividades de la industria tabacalera para comercializar cigarrillos en América Latina y el Caribe y minar la salud pública. Organización Panamericana de la Salud, 2002. Información disponible en: http://www.paho.org/Spanish/HPP/HPM/TOH/profits_over_people.htm

  31. Ayala I, Valdés-Salgado R. Los documentos internos de la industria tabacalera En: Primer informe sobre combate al tabaquismo. México ante el convenio Marco para el Control del Tabaco. Cuernavaca, México: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2005: 87-92.

  32. Garret C. State Joins Suit vs. Reynolds, Tobacco Company’s Ad Claim Challenged. The Hartford Courant, 2005.

  33. Philip Morris International. Confronting cigarette contraband. Philip Morris International Document, 2003. Información disponible en: http://philipmorrisinternational.com./global/downloads/obe/confronting_contraband.pdf

  34. World Health Organization (WHO). Tobacco industry tactics for resisting public policy on health. Bull World Health Organ. 2000; 78:902-910.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com