medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)

2024, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2024; 34 (4)

Safety in breast reconstruction. Evidence-based medicine. Recommendations

Ramos-Gallardo G, Herrán-Motta FS, Bustamante-Lambaren LA, Kishi-Sutto CV, Sánchez-Vanegas M, Robledo-Madrid P, Fernández-Díaz Ó, García-Pérez M, Lugo-Beltrán I, Santamaría-Linares EA, Cuenca-Pardo J, Mercado-Bravo MS, Vélez-Benítez E, Guitian-González M, Carvallo-Maioco P, Ornelas-Flores MC, Rojas-Gutiérrez CD, Contreras-Sánchez H, Ochoa-Padilla F

Language: Spanish
References: 33
Page: 140-146
PDF size: 274.96 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Breast reconstruction is an important part of breast cancer treatment. As with any procedure, complications are likely to arise, even in experienced hands, and it is, therefore, the responsibility of the plastic surgeon to make a pre-reconstruction assessment to reduce the risks and complications of the procedure, provide adequate follow-up, and inform the patient about the different options to reach a better decision regarding her treatment. From this standpoint, the purpose of this work is to carry out a review to establish safety guidelines, using evidence-based medicine, to carry out the mammoplasty procedure, specifically in a patient who has had a mastectomy owing to cancer.


REFERENCES

  1. Saldanha IJ, Cao W, Broyles JM et al. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2021. Report No.: 21-EHC027.

  2. Mortada H, Alwadai A, Bamakhrama B et al. The impact of diabetes mellitus on breast reconstruction outcomes and complications: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47 (2): 570-583.

  3. Mrad MA, Al Qurashi AA, Shah Mardan QNM et al. Predictors of complications after breast reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (12): e4693. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004693.

  4. ElAbd R, Prabhu N, Alibrahim A et al. Autologous versus alloplastic reconstruction for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46 (2): 597-609. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02664-y. Epub 2021 Nov 29. Erratum in: Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022; 46 (Suppl 1): 229. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02767-0.

  5. Shafiee A, Bahri RA, Rafiei MA. Frailty among patients undergoing breast reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 84: 556-566.

  6. Ahmed SH, Shekouhi R, Gerhold C et al. Contributors to post-operative venous thromboembolism risk after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2024; 94: 106-118.

  7. Mureau MAM. Breast reconstruction guideline working group. Dutch breast reconstruction guideline. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018; 71 (3): 290-304.

  8. Macadam SA, Zhong T, Weichman K et al. Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer survivors: a multicenter comparison of four abdominally based autologous reconstruction methods. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (3): 758-771.

  9. Saldanha IJ, Broyles JM, Adam GP et al. Autologous reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (3): e4181. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004181. Erratum in: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022; 10 (3): e4289. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004289.

  10. Hansson E, Brorson F, Lofstrand J, Elander A, Svensson M. Systematic review of cost-effectiveness in breast reconstruction: deep inferior epigastric perforator flap vs. implant-based breast reconstruction. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2024; 59: 1-13.

  11. Sabitovic A, Trostrup H, Damsgaard TE. The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on surgical outcomes following autologous and implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 87: 17-23.

  12. Stefura T, Rusinek J, Wator J et al. Implant vs. autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies comparing surgical approaches in 55,455 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 77: 346-358. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.11.044.

  13. Ren Y, Yu Y, Xu K, Li Z, Wang X. Meta-analysis of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction versus autologous breast reconstruction in the setting of PMRT. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48 (10): 1940-1948.

  14. Nag S, Berlin L, Hunter K, Bonawitz SC. Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Clin Breast Cancer 2024; 24 (3): 184-190.

  15. Ramos-Gallardo G, Velez-Benitez E, Cuenca-Pardo J, Cardenas-Camarena L, Ramírez Montañana A et al. What is the process for breast implant manufacturing? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (12): 2063-2074.

  16. Zhu L, Liu C. Postoperative complications following prepectoral versus partial subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction using ADM: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47 (4): 1260-1273. doi: 10.1007/s00266-023-03296-0.

  17. Hu Y, Zhou X, Tong X et al. Postoperative antibiotics and infection rates after implant-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg 2022; 9: 926936.

  18. Zhang X, Ning S, Zhang Y. Complications after prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48 (21): 4421-4429. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04096-w.

  19. Montorfano L, Hung YC, Chaker S et al. Examination of outcome disparities in reports of prepectoral and subpectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 90 (5): 506-515.

  20. Nolan IT, Farajzadeh MM, Bekisz JM, Boyd CJ, Gibson EG, Salibian AA. Prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2024; 12 (5): e5808. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005808.

  21. Zheng C, Liu J, Wen Y, Lin S, Han H, Xu C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of postmastectomy radiation therapy on prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction. Front Surg 2023; 9: 1019950. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1019950.

  22. Murphy D, O'Donnell JP, Ryan ÉJ et al. Immediate breast cancer reconstruction with or without dermal matrix or synthetic mesh support: a review and network meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 151 (4): 563e-574e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009984.

  23. Broyles JM, Liao EC, Kim J et al. Acellular dermal matrix-associated complications in implant-based breast reconstruction: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two human tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (3): 493-500.

  24. Ng TP, Loo BYK, Yong N et al. Review: implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective studies comparing use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) versus without ADM. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31 (5): 3366-3376.

  25. AlQhtani A. Immediate symmetrization of the contralateral breast in breast reconstruction-revision, complications, and satisfaction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2024; 12 (2): e5586.

  26. Rancati AO, Nahabedian MY, Angrigiani CH et al. Symmetry following unilateral two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction: is there an optimal time for managing the contralateral breast? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022; 75 (10): 3700-3706.

  27. Trigos I, Herrán FS. La mama contralateral como otro factor determinante de la reconstrucción mamaria. Cir Plast 2002; 12 (3): 119-127.

  28. Ramos-Gallardo G, Ríos-Lara RL, Cuenca-Pardo J, Cárdenas-Camarena L, Contrera-Bulnes L, Vélez-Benítez E et al. Manejo de seroma crónico en pacientes con implantes de mama en relación con el diagnóstico de linfoma anaplásico de células gigantes. Cir Plast 2020; 29: 147-154.

  29. Cuenca-Pardo J, Velez-Benítez BE, Ramos-Gallardo G, Iribarren-Moreno MR. Seroma: una alerta de patologías relacionadas a implantes mamarios. Medicina basada en evidencia. Cir Plast 2020; 29: 15-34.

  30. Ordinola-Navarro A, López-Luis BA, Trinidad-Esparza CV, Vera-Lastra O. Use of illegal foreign substances for cosmetic purposes an increasing global problem. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2023; 47 (2): 901-903.

  31. Scheflan M, Gronovich Y, Maisel Lotan A, Winder G. What 736 plastic surgeons think about explantation and capsulectomy: a global opinion poll. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 149 (6): 1071e-1079e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009090.

  32. Serena TJ, Habib P, Derosa A. Breast implant illness: a cohort study. Cureus 2023; 15 (4): e38056. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38056.

  33. Bascone CM, McGraw JR, Couto JA et al. Exploring factors associated with implant removal satisfaction in breast implant illness patients: a PRO BREAST-Q study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11 (9): e5273. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005273.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com