medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2025, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2025; 39 (1)

Complications in total hip arthroplasty with double mobility prosthesis: Experience in a third level hospital

Hernández-Téllez I, García-Andino J, Palmieri-Bouchan R, Áviles-Jiménez P, Estrada-Hernández I

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page: 2-7
PDF size: 219.78 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a successful surgical intervention for end-stage hip arthritis, however, it is not extent for complications. The risk of instability after THA with conventional design is up to 7% for primary procedures and 5-20% for revisions. The purpose of this study is to document the complications that occur with the double mobility prosthetic design. Materials and methods: observational, longitudinal, retrospective and descriptive study. A sample of 542 patients undergoing primary THA using a double mobility design was included, complications occurring from December 1, 2015 to December 31, 2021 were recorded. Results: the complications that occurred were: 13 (2.39%) patients with postoperative dislocation, five (0.92%) with periprosthetic fracture, five (0.92%) with transient neuropraxia of the sciatic nerve, three (0.55%) with periprosthetic infection, one (0.18%) with chronic pain and one (0.18%) with pulmonary thromboembolism. Conclusions: the double mobility design is an appropriate option to reduce the risk of prosthetic dislocation in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.


REFERENCES

  1. Mohammed R, Hayward K, Mulay S, Bindi F, Wallace M. Outcomes of dual-mobility acetabular cup for instability in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015; 16(1): 9-13.

  2. De Martino I, Konstantinos G, Keyes P, Peter T. Dual Mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop. 2014; 5 (3):180-187.

  3. De Martino I, D'Apolito R, Soranoglou VG, Poultsides LA, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B(ASuppl1): 18-24.

  4. Ko LM, Hozack WJ. The dual mobility cup: what problems does it solve? Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(1 Suppl A): 60-63.

  5. Loving L, Herrera L, Banerjee S, Heffernan C, Nevelos J, Markel DC, et al. Dual mobility bearings withstand loading from steeper cup-inclinations without substantial wear. J Orthop Res. 2015; 33(3): 398-404.

  6. Jauregui JJ, Pierce TP, Elmallah RK, Cherian JJ, Delanois RE, Mont MA. Dual mobility cups: an effective prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasties for preventing dislocations. Hip Int. 2016; 26(1): 57-61.

  7. Stroh A, Naziri Q, Johnson AJ, Mont MA. Dual-mobility bearings: a review of the literature. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012; 9(1): 23-31.

  8. Gonzalez AI, Bartolone P, Lubbeke A, Dupuis-Lozeron E, Peter R, Hoffmeyer P, et al. Comparison of dual-mobility cup and unipolar cup for prevention of dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2017; 88(1): 18-23.

  9. Torres-Pérez A, Fernández-Fairen M, Murcia-Mazón A, Meroño A. Resultados del cotilo con doble movilidad de última generación en España (135 PTC seguidas durante una media de 32 meses). Acta Ortop Mex. 2014; 28(5): 277-286.

  10. Vasukutty NL, Middleton RG, Matthews EC, Young PS, Uzoigwe CE, Minhas TH. The double-mobility acetabular component in revision total hip replacement: the United Kingdom experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(5): 603-608.

  11. De Martino I, Triantafyllopoulos GK, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Dual mobility cups in total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthopedics. 2014; 5(3): 180-187.

  12. Gallart X, Gomez JC, Fernández-Valencia JA, Combalía A, Bori G, García S, et al. Análisis de los fracasos de un modelo de cotilo constreñido cementado en pacientes de alto riesgo de luxación. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2014; 58(5): 274-282.

  13. Hernigou P, Dubory A, Potage D, Roubineau F, Flouzat-Lachaniette CH. Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision. Int Orthop. 2017; 41(3): 481-490.

  14. Vielpeau C, Lebel B, Ardouin L, Burdin G, Lautridou C. The dual mobility socket concept: experience with 668 cases. Int Orthop. 2011; 35(2): 225-230.

  15. Langlais FL, Ropars M, Gaucher F, Musset T, Chaix O. Dual mobility cemented cups have low dislocation rates in THA revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(2): 389-395. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0047-9.

  16. Van Heumen M, Heesterbeek PJ, Swierstra BA, Van Hellemondt GG, Goosen JH. Dual mobility acetabular component in revision total hip arthroplasty for persistent dislocation: no dislocations in 50 hips after 1-5 years. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015; 16(1): 15-20.

  17. Canton G, Moghnie A, Cleva M, Kostoris FM, Murena L. Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a retrospective evaluation at mid-term follow-up. Acta Biomed. 2019; 90(1-S): 98-103.

  18. Assi C, Kheir N, Samaha C, Kouyoumjian P, Yammine K. Early results of total hip arthroplasty using dual-mobility cup in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. SICOT J. 2018; 4: 4.

  19. Kim YT, Yoo JH, Kim MK, Kim S, Hwang J. Dual mobility hip arthroplasty provides better outcomes compared to hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a retrospective comparative clinical study. Int Orthop. 2018; 42(6): 1241-1246.

  20. Tarasevicius S, Smailys A, Grigaitis K, Robertsson O, Stucinskas J. Short-term outcome after total hip arthroplasty using dual-mobility cup: report from Lithuanian Arthroplasty Register. Int Orthop. 2017; 41(3): 595-598.

  21. Moreta J, Uriarte I, Foruria X, Urra I, Aguirre U, Martínez-de Los Mozos JL. Cementation of a dual-mobility cup into a well-fixed cementless shell in patients with high risk of dislocation undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2021; 31(1): 97-102.

  22. De Martino I, D'Apolito R, Waddell BS, McLawhorn AS, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Early intraprosthetic dislocation in dual-mobility implants: a systematic review. Arthroplast Today. 2017; 3(3): 197-202.

  23. Fabry C, Kaehler M, Herrmann S, Woernle C, Bader R. Dynamic behavior of tripolar hip endoprostheses under physiological conditions and their effect on stability. Med Eng Phys. 2014; 36(1): 65-71.

  24. Batailler C, Fary C, Verdier R, Aslanian T, Caton J, Lustig S. The evolution of outcomes and indications for the dual-mobility cup: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2017; 41(3): 645-659.

  25. Schmidt A, Batailler C, Camdon F, Servien E, Lusting S. Dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty; Efficient strategy to decrease dislocation risk. J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35(2): 500-507.

  26. Epinette JA. Clinical outcomes, survivorship and adverse events with mobile-bearings versus fixed-bearings in hip arthroplasty-a prospective comparative cohort study of 143 ADM versus 130 trident cups at 2 to 6-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30(2): 241-248.

  27. Cypres A, Fiquet A, Girardin P, Fitch D, Bauchu P, Bonnard O, et al. Long-term outcomes of a dual-mobility cup and cementless triple-taper femoral stem combination in total hip replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14(1): 376.

  28. Pritchett JW. Adventure sports and sexual freedom hip replacement: the tripolar hip. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018; 28(1): 37-43. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2010-0.

  29. Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982; 64(9): 1295-306.

  30. Cohn MR, Levack AE, Trivedi NN, Villa JC, Wellman DS, Lyden JP, et al. The hip fracture patient on warfarin: evaluating blood loss and time to surgery. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31(8): 407-413.

  31. Boyer B, Philippot R, Geringer J, Farizon F. Primary total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility socket to prevent dislocation: a 22-year follow-up of 240 hips. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(3): 511-518.



EVIDENCE LEVEL

IV




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com