2024, Number 8
<< Back Next >>
Med Int Mex 2024; 40 (8)
Evaluation of the frequency of renal relapse following remission induction therapy in patients with lupus nephritis in a tertiary center
Galaviz RAP, Soto RI, Segura LFK, Muñoz HMA, García AFJ, Sicsik ASA
Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 479-487
PDF size: 206.55 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To determine the frequency of renal relapse after remission induction
treatment in subjects with proliferative lupus nephritis treated at a tertiary center.
Materials and Methods: Single-center observational retrospective cohort study
of patients with a clinical diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus according to the
SLICC 2012 criteria and pathological diagnosis of class III and IV lupus nephritis who
received remission induction therapy from January 2020 to December 2022 at the
UMAE 71 Specialty Hospital in the city of Torreon, Coahuila, Mexico.
Results: Sixty-eight files that met the inclusion criteria were included. Of the 20
patients treated with cyclophosphamide, 6 presented a complete response vs 27 of 48
who received mycophenolate mofetil (p = 0.0424). Out of 19 cases treated with high
doses of cyclophosphamide, 4 presented nephritis relapse, as well as 2 of 48 patients
treated with mycophenolate mofetil (p = 0.05).
Conclusions: Patients with class III/IV lupus nephritis obtain greater benefit with
mycophenolate mofetil during induction therapy.
REFERENCES
Parikh SV, Almaani S, Brodsky S, Rovin BH. Update on lupusnephritis: Core Curriculum 2020. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 76:265-81.doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.017
Tamirou F, Houssiau FA. Management of lupus nephritis.J Clin Med 2021; 10: 1-11. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040670
De Rosa M, Azzato F, Toblli JE, De Rosa G, et al. A prospectiveobservational cohort study highlights kidney biopsyfindings of lupus nephritis patients in remission who flarefollowing withdrawal of maintenance therapy. Kidney Int2018; 94. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.05.021
Ugarte-Gil MF, Wojdyla D, Pons-Estel GJ, Catoggio LJ,et al. Remission and Low Disease Activity Status (LDAS)protect lupus patients from damage occurrence: datafrom a multiethnic, multinational Latin American LupusCohort (GLADEL). Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211814
Gul H, Mushtaq MS, Salim B, Samreen S, et al. A Comparisonof mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide aslupus nephritis induction therapy. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad2020; 32: 454-8.
Liu Z, Zhang H, Liu Z, Xing C, et al. Multitarget therapy forinduction treatment of lupus nephritis: a randomized trial:A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162: 18-26. doi:10.7326/M14-1030
Chen YE, Korbert SM, Katz RS, Schwartz MM, et al. Value ofa complete or partial remission in severe lupus nephritis.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008; 3. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03280807
Weeding E, Fava A, Magder L, Goldman D, Petri M. Onethirdof patients with lupus nephritis classified as completeresponders continue to accrue progressive renal damagedespite resolution of proteinuria. Lupus Sci Med 2022; 9.doi: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000684
Wang J, Qi YY, Chen XP, Ma L, et al. Analysis of clinical riskfactors in relapsed patients with class IV lupus nephritis.Exp Ther Med 2018; 15. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6130
Gasparotto M, Gatto M, Binda V, Doria A, Moroni G. Lupusnephritis: Clinical presentations and outcomes in the 21stcentury. Rheumatology (United Kingdom) 2020; 59: V39-51. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa381
Ichinose K, Kitamura M, Sato S, Eguchi M, et al. Completerenal response at 12 months after induction therapy is associatedwith renal relapse-free rate in lupus nephritis: asingle-center, retrospective cohort study. Lupus 2019; 28:501-9. doi: 10.1177/0961203319829827
Sprangers B, Monahan M, Appel GB. Diagnosis and treatmentof lupus nephritis flares--an update. Nat Rev Nephrol2012; 8: 709-17. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2012.220
Illei GG, Takada K, Parkin D, Austin HA, et al. Renal flaresare common in patients with severe proliferative lupusnephritis treated with pulse immunosuppressive therapy:long-term followup of a cohort of 145 patients participatingin randomized controlled studies. Arthritis Rheum 2002;46: 995-1002. doi: 10.1002/art.10142
Yap DYH, Tang C, Ma MKM, Mok MMY, et al. Longtermdata on disease flares in patients with proliferative lupusnephritis in recent years. J Rheumatol 2017; 44: 1375-83.doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170226
Tunnicliffe DJ, Palmer SC. Immunosuppressive treatmentfor proliferative lupus nephritis: Summary of a CochraneReview. Am J Kidney Dis 2018; 72. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.07.008
So MW, Koo BS, Kim Y-G, Lee C-K, Yoo B. Predictive valueof remission status after 6 months induction therapy inpatients with proliferative lupus nephritis: a retrospectiveanalysis. Clin Rheumatol 2011; 30: 1399-405. doi: 10.1007/s10067-011-1778-2
Parikh SV, Nagaraja HN, Hebert L, Rovin BH. Renal flare as apredictor of incident and progressive CKD in patients withlupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 9: 279-84. doi:10.2215/CJN.05040513
Mosca M, Bencivelli W, Neri R, Pasquariello A, et al.Renal flares in 91 SLE patients with diffuse proliferativeglomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 2002; 61: 1502-9. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00280.x
Hill GS, Delahousse M, Nochy D, Rémy P, et al. Predictivepower of the second renal biopsy in lupus nephritis: significanceof macrophages. Kidney Int 2001; 59: 304-16.doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00492.x
Yang T-H, Wu T-H, Chang Y-L, Liao H-T, et al. Cyclosporine forthe treatment of lupus nephritis in patients with systemiclupus erythematosus. Clin Nephrol 2018; 89: 277-85. doi:10.5414/CN109325
Rovin BH, Furie R, Latinis K, Looney RJ, et al. Efficacy andsafety of rituximab in patients with active proliferativelupus nephritis: the Lupus Nephritis Assessment withRituximab study. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64: 1215-26. doi:10.1002/art.34359