medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3186 (Electronic)

2022, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Acta Médica 2022; 23 (3)

Treating breast ptosis withy endoprosthesis and mastopexy with inverted T-closure

Expósito JA; Escobar VH, Tamayo CAM, Cuastumal FDK, Molina SS

Language: Spanish
References: 40
Page:
PDF size: 305.59 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: In the last ten years, mastopexy with breast implants has been an object of attention and study. When the inverted T-closure is used in this procedure, the purpose is to obtain better projection and filling of the breast upper pole.
Objective: To assess the outcomes of treatment of grades I and II breast ptosis with endoprosthesis using the technique of mastopexy with inverted T-closure.
Methods: A descriptive, prospective and longitudinal study was carried out in 20 women who presented breast ptosis and who attended the plastic surgery service of Hermanos Ameijeiras Clinical-Surgical Hospital, between September 2015 and February 2019. They underwent augmentation mastoplasty with endoprosthesis placement and mastopexy technique with inverted T-closure using the fixed reference points of the Wise mold. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for data processing.
Results: The average age was 30.3 ± 4.7 years. 55 % of patients were classified as having grade I breast ptosis. The volume used was significantly associated with the degree of ptosis (P=0.0000˂0.05). The use of implants smaller than 350 cc of high profile predominated. 99 % of patients had good aesthetic outcomes and only one complication occurred (5 %).
Conclusions: Breast ptosis was corrected in 100 % of the cases, achieving good aesthetic results and few complications.


REFERENCES

  1. Nahabedian MY, Disa JJ, Colwell A. Plastic Surgery of the Breast: A 75-Year Journey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147(2):539-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007625

  2. Perry D, Frame JD. The history and development of breast implants. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020;102(7):478-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2020.0003

  3. Lee HJ, Ock JJ. An Ideal Female Breast Shape in Balance with the Body Proportions of Asians. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(9):e2377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002377

  4. González Ulloa M. Correction of hypotrophy of the breast by means of exogenous material. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1960;25:15-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196001000-00002

  5. Spear SL, Pelletiere CV, Menon N. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2004;28(5):259-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-0032-6

  6. Martínez AA, Chung S. Breast Ptosis in Treasure Island (FL). Stat Pearls Publishing. 2022 [acceso: 20/12/2021]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK567792/

  7. Hu H, Guan Q, Zheng Y, Zhong Y, Min N, Wei Y, et al. Inverted-T pattern reduction mammoplasty in bilateral breastptosis: cosmetic and oncologicaloutcomes. Gland Surg. 2021;10(10):2925-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-21-561

  8. Qureshi AA, Myckatyn TM, Tenenbaum MM. Mastopexy and Mastopexy-Augmentation. Aesthet Surg J. 2018;38(4):374-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx181

  9. Pferdehirt R, Nahabedian MY. Finesse in Mastopexy and Augmentation Mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;148(3):451e-61e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008303

  10. Austin RE, Saheb Al Zamani M, Lista F, Ahmad J. Periareolar Augmentation-Mastopexy. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(9):953-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz128

  11. Messa CA, Messa CA. One-Stage Augmentation Mastopexy: A Retrospective Ten-Year Review of 2183 Consecutive Procedures. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(12):1352-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz143

  12. Graça Neto L, Daniel M. Double Space Augmentation Mastopexy-A Reflection After 15 Years. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(2):491-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02021-5

  13. ShiloYaacobi D, Ad-El DD. Breast Plastic Surgery - Challenges And Innovations Breast Surgery Editorial. Harefuah. 2020 [acceso: 20/12/2021];159(9):694-6. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32955814/

  14. Sarosiek K, Maxwell GP, Unger JG. Getting the Most Out of Augmentation-Mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142(5):742e-59e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004961

  15. Ismail KT, Toth BA. Triple-Plane Augmentation Mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(8):e2344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002344

  16. Efendioglu K, Aksam E, Aksam B, Tuzuner M, Gence H. TheTuck-in Mastopexy. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;81(3):257-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001535

  17. Borbón Mendoza J, Beato Canfux A, Álvarez Ross A. Tratamiento quirúrgico de la ginecomastia y ptosis mamaria con técnica novedosa. Rev Cub Med Mil. 1997 [acceso: 20/12/2021];26(2):141-5. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-65571997000200009&lng=es.

  18. Regnault P. Breastptosis. Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 1976 [acceso: 20/12/2021];3(2):193-203. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1261176/

  19. Charles de Sá L, de Aguiar Valladão T, Vieira DM, Aboudib JH. Anthropometric Aspects in the Breast Augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(5):1498-1507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01853-5

  20. Schrager S, Lyon SM, Poore SO. Breast Implants: Common Questions and Answers. Am Fam Physician. 2021 [acceso: 20/12/2021];104(5):500-8. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34783490/

  21. Layt CW. Augmentation Mastopexy: Planning and Performance for Predictability: Management of Complications. Clin Plast Surg. 2021;48(1):45-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2020.09.002

  22. Rathee M, Rao PL, Bhoria M. Prevalence of Gingival Biotypes among Young Dentate North Indian Population: A Biometric Approach. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;9(2):104-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1343

  23. Faulkner HR, Coopey SB, Sisodia R, Kelly BN, Maurer LR, Ellis D. Does An ERAS Protocol Reduce Postoperative Opiate Prescribing in Plastic Surgery? JPRAS Open. 2021;31:22-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2021.10.006

  24. Shrestha B, Dunn L. The Declarationof Helsinki on Medical Research involving Human Subjects: A Review of Seventh Revision. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020;17(4):548-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v17i4.1042

  25. Forcada EM, Fernández MC, Aso JV, Iglesias IP. Augmentation mastopexy: maximal reduction and stable implant coverage using four flaps. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38(4):711-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0356-9

  26. Cruz NI. Breast Asymmetry in Women Requesting Plastic Surgery of the Breast. P R Health Sci J. 2018 [acceso: 20/12/2021];37(4):230-8. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30548060/

  27. Colwell AS, Taylor EM. Recent Advances in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(2):421e-32e. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006510

  28. Monton J, Torres A, Gijon M, Chang Azancot L, Kenig N, Trandafir PC, et al. Use of Symmetry Assessment Methods in the Context of Breast Surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(5):1440-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01755-6

  29. Moreira M, Silva LC, Fagundes DJ. Mastopexyperiareolar with mammary subfascial implantation in the treatment of the association of mammaryhypotrophy and ptosis. Rev Bras Cir Plast. 2006 [acceso: 20/12/2021];21(3):149-54. Disponible en:http://www.rbcp.org.br/details/76/mastopexy-periareolar-with-mammary-subfascial-implantation-in-the-treatment-of-the-association-of-mammary-hypotrophy-and-ptosis

  30. Coombs DM, Srivastava U, Amar D, Rubin JP, Gusenoff JA. The Challenges of Augmentation Mastopexy in the Massive Weight Loss Patient: Technical Considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139(5):1090-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003294

  31. Fuente Del Campo A, García García F, Ortiz Monasterio I. Three-Flap Mastopexy with Reduction or Augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(6):2691-705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02487-x

  32. Ariyan S, Martin J, Lal A, Cheng D, Borah GL, Chung KC, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing surgical-site infection in plastic surgery: anevidence-based consensus conference statement from the American Association of Plastic Surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):1723-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001265

  33. Xue AS, Dayan E, Rohrich RJ. Achieving Predictability in Augmentation Mastopexy: An Update. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(9):e2784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002784

  34. Ali B, Choi EE, Barlas V, Nuzzi L, Morrell NT, Labow B, et al. Perioperative Safety of Combined Augmentation-Mastopexy: An Evaluation of National Database. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;87(5):493-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003022

  35. Larsen A, Aaberg FL, Hemmingsen MN, Weltz TK, Ørholt M, Stemann Andersen P, et al. Deskinning in Inverted-T Mastopexy and Augmentation Mastopexy: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021;45(2):423-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-02028-y

  36. Daher JC, Di Lamartini J, do Amaral G, Borges Pedroso D, Cintra Junior R, de Souza Borgatto M. Mastopexia asociada con implantes de silicona submusculares o subglandulares: sistematización de elecciones y dificultades. 2012;27(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-51752012000200021

  37. Peña Cabús G. Mastopexia tridimensional con anclaje efectivo: Una respuesta a la ptosis, alteraciones de volumen, flacidez y recidiva en las mamoplastias. Cir Plast Ibero Latinoam. 2010 [acceso: 20/12/2021];36(3):203-13. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0376-78922010000300002&lng=es.

  38. Tebbetts JB, Teitelbaum S. High and extra high projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):2150-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f44564

  39. Handel N. Secondary mastopexy in the augmented patient: a récipe for disaster. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(7):152S-63S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000246106.85435.74

  40. Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 [acceso: 20/12/2021];116(7):2005-16. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16327616/




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com