Kopuz D, Sancak EI, Tekce N

Language: English
References: 26
Page: 76-85
PDF size: 227.73 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of different decontamination agents on the bond strength of saliva-contaminated CAD/CAM blocks and repair composite materials. Two hunderd eighty 3-mm-thick specimens were prepared from four different CAD/CAM materials: Katana Zirconia UTML disc, IPS e.max CAD block, Shofu block, and Vita Enamic block. Each material was divided into seven different subgroups (N=70). Group 1 had a clean surface. The other groups were comprised of the samples, which were contaminated with human saliva: group 2: negative control (non-cleaned); group 3: cleaned with water spray; group 4: cleaned with 70% ethanol; group 5: cleaned with Ivoclean; group 6: cleaned with Katana Cleaner; and group 7: cleaned with phosphoric acid. After the decontamination protocols, the resin composite cylinders were bonded to the CAD/CAM surfaces with a thin layer of dual-cured resin cement. The samples were stored for 24 hours at 37°C in distilled water. Then, they were subjected to a shear bond strength test (SBS). The values were recorded, and fracture types were evaluated using a microscope. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test. Generally, all decontaminating agents improved the SBS of composites to Katana Zirconia UTML, IPS e.max, and Vita Enamic materials (p‹0.05). However, for Shofu materials, group 6 samples exhibited significantly higher bond strength values as compared with group 2 samples (p=0.026). The highest SBS values were seen in the phosphoric acid-treated group in Katana zirconia materials (26.45 ± 9.38 MPa), whereas the lowest values were seen in group 2 samples in Shofu materials (13.17 ± 3.40 MPa). Each decontaminant agent improved the bond strength of composites to the contaminated CAD/CAM materials. If saliva is not cleaned before adhesive procedure, SBS values may decrease. All decontamination agents can be used safely on zirconia, lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic, hybrid ceramic, and polymer-infiltrated ceramic surfaces.

REFERENCES

1. Leibrock A., Degenhart M., Behr M., RosentrittM., Handel G. In vitro study of the effectof thermo- and load-cycling on the bondstrength of porcelain repair systems. J OralRehabil. 1999; 26: 130-137.

2. Borges G., Sophr A., De Goes M., SobrinhoL.C.D. Effect of etching and airborne particleabrasion on the microstructure of differentdental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89:479-488.

3. Kang S.-H., Chang J., Son H.-H. Flexuralstrength and microstructure of two lithiumdisilicate glass ceramics for CAD/CAMrestoration in the dental clinic. Restor DentEndod. 2013; 38: 134.

4. Ruse N.D., Sadoun M.J. Resin-compositeBlocks for Dental CAD/CAM Applications.J Dent Res. 2014; 93: 1232-1234.

5. Hickel R., Brüshaver K., Ilie N. Repair ofrestorations–criteria for decision making andclinical recommendations. Dent Mater. 2013;29 (1): 28-50.

6. Sailer I., Pjetursson B.E., Zwahlen M.,Hämmerle C.H.F. A systematic review of thesurvival and complication rates of all-ceramicand metal–ceramic reconstructions after anobservation period of at least 3 years. Part II:fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Impl Res.2007; 18: 86-96.

7. Gordan V.V., Garvan C.W., Blaser P.K., etal. A long-term evaluation of alternativetreatments to replacement of resin-basedcomposite restorations: results of a sevenyearstudy. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140 (12):1476-1484.

8. Neis C.A., Albuquerque N.L. AlbuquerqueIde S., Gomes E.A., Souza- Filho C.B.,Feitosa V.P., et al. Surface treatments for repairof feldspathic, leucite - and lithium disilicatereinforcedglass ceramics using compositeresin. Braz Dent J. 2015; 26:152-155.

9. Kimmich M., Stappert C.F.J. Intraoraltreatment of veneering porcelain chipping offixed dental restorations: a review and clini-cal application. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013; 144(1): 31-44.

10. Elsaka S.E. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesiveresin cement: The effect of surface treatments.J Adhes Dent. 2014; 16 (6): 531-540.

11. Ozcan M., Niedermeier W. Clinical studyon the reasons for and location of failuresof metal-ceramic restorations and survivalof repairs. Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15 (3):299-302.

12. Raposo L.H.A., Neiva N.A., Silva G.R. da,Carlo H.L., Mota A.S. da, Prado C.J. do, etal. Ceramic restoration repair: report of twocases. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17 (2): 140-144.

13. Fasbinder D.J. Clinical performance of chairsideCAD/CAM restorations. J Am DentAssoc. 2006; 137: 2-31.

14. Senyilmaz D.P., Palin W.M., Shortall A.C.C.,Burke F.J.T. The effect of surface preparationand luting agent on bond strength to azirconium-based ceramic. Oper Dent. 2007;32: 623-630.

15. Akyil M.S., Uzun I.H., Bayindir F. Bondstrength of resin cement to yttrium- stabilizedtetragonal zirconia ceramic treated with airabrasion, silica coating, and laser irradiation.Photomed Laser Surg. 2010; 28: 801-808.

16. Yang B., Scharnberg M., Wolfart S., QuassA. C., Ludwin K., Adelung R., et al. Influenceof contamination on bonding to zirconiaceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater.2007; 81 (2): 283-290.

17. Eiriksson S.O., Pereira P.N., Swift E.J. Jr.,Heymann H.O. Effects of saliva contaminationon resin-resin bond strength. Dent Mater.2004; 20 (1): 37-44.

18. Aboush Y. Removing saliva contaminationfrom porcelain veneers before bonding. JProsthet Dent. 1998; 80 (6): 649-653.

19. Takahashi K., Toshiyama T., Yokoyama A.,Shimada Y, Yoshiyama M. Effect of decontaminationmaterials on bond strength ofsaliva-contaminated CAD/CAM resin blockand dentin. Dent Mater J. 2022: 41: 601-607.

20. Klosa K., Wolfart S., Lehmann F., Wenz H.,Kern M. The effect of storage conditions,contamination modes and cleaning procedureson the resin bond strength to lithium disilicateceramic. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11: 127-135.

21. Angkasith P., Burgess J.O., Bottino M.C.,Lawson N.C. Cleaning methods for zirconiafollowing salivary contamination. JProsthodont. 2016; 25: 375-379.

22. Irmak Ö., Yaman B.C., Orhan E.O.,Kilicarslan M.A., MAnte F.K., Ozer F.Influence of cleaning methods on bond stren-gth to saliva contaminated zirconia. J EsthetRestor Dent. 2018; 30: 551-556.

23. Yoshida F., Tsujimoto A., Ishii R., Nojiri K.,Takamizawa T., Miyazaki M., et la. Influenceof surface treatment of contaminated lithiumdisilicate and leucite glass ceramics on surfacefree energy and bond strength of universaladhesives. Dental Materials Journal. 2015;34: 855-862.

24. Güth J.F., Stawarczyk B., Edelhoff D., LiebermannA. Zirconia and its novel compositions:What do clinicians need to know? QuintessenceInt. 2019; 50: 512-520.

25. Nejatidanesh F., Savabi O., Savabi G.,Razavi M. Effect of cleaning methods onretentive values of saliva-contaminatedimplant-supported zirconia copings. ClinOral Implants Res. 2018; 29: 530-536.

26. Atsu S.S., Kilicarslan M.A., KucukesmenH.C., Aka P.S. Effect of zirconium-oxideceramic surface treatments on the bond strengthto adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95: 430-436.