medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-7757 (Electronic)
Órgano de difusión de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Cirugía y Traumatología Bucomaxilofacial (ALACIBU)

2024, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Lat Am J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2024; 4 (1)

Anatomical relationship of the lower alveolar canal with respect to the third molars class II using the Cone-Beam technique

Maldonado A, Marín J, Sosa D, Paolini O

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 21-26
PDF size: 207.58 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The inferior alveolar canal is an important anatomical structure of the mandible. Located between the apices of the third molars and the inferior alveolar canal, relationships can be established to be considered at the time of the surgical approach. The objective of this research is to determine the anatomical relationship that exists between the lower alveolar canal with respect to class II third molars using Cone-Beam computed tomography. The present investigation is descriptive, quantitative, of transversal documentary design. The sample consisted of 122 tomographies from the Odontoimagen Rx3D Dental Radiology Center database, located in the State of Mérida. The data were analyzed with the statistical package SPSS version 15. The third molars class II position A did not present displacement in their majority and the location of the canal was related to the apical third, a deformation of the canal with greater prevalence in the vestibule-lingual direction and the distance with the root was 0 mm. Class II position B third molars presented a displacement of the canal towards the lingual with a location with respect to the middle third of the root described towards the apical third. The deformation in the vestibule-lingual direction and the distance from the point closest to the root of 0 mm. Class II position C third molars described a displacement in the lingual and vestibular direction, both with the same percentage, a location with a higher index in the apical third. The deformation of the canal was more frequent in the vestibule-lingual direction with a distance to the root of 0 mm.


REFERENCES

  1. Domínguez MJ, Ruge JO, Aguilar MG, Ñañez LÓ, Oliveros TG. Análisis de la posición y trayectoria del conducto alveolar inferior (CAI) en tomografía volumétrica computarizada (TC Cone Beam - TCCB). Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2010; 22 (1): 12-22.

  2. Mousa A, El Dessouky S, El Beshlawy D. Sex determination by radiographic localization of the inferior alveolar canal using cone-beam computed tomography in an Egyptian population. Imaging Sci Dent. 2020; 50 (2): 117-124.

  3. Gutiérrez-Ventura F, Beltrán-Silva JA, Huamaní-Parra J, Abanto Silva LE. Disposición del conducto dentario inferior en el cuerpo mandibular. Estudio anatómico y tomográfico. Rev Estomatol Hered. 2014; 19 (1): 21.

  4. Ruge OY, Camargo ÓA, Ortiz YP. Consideraciones anatómicas del conducto alveolar inferior. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2009; 21(1): 86-97.

  5. Clé-Ovejero A, Sánchez-Torres A, Camps-Font O, Gay-Escoda C, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E. Does 3-dimensional imaging of the third molar reduce the risk of experiencing inferior alveolar nerve injury owing to extraction?: A meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017; 148 (8): 575-583. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.04.001.

  6. Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Araki M, Iwai K, Sawada K, Akiyama Y. Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT. J Oral Sci. 2006; 48 (1): 27-34. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.48.27.

  7. Seddon HJ. A Classification of Nerve Injuries. Br Med J. 1942; 2 (4260): 237-239.

  8. Ramadorai A, Tay ABG, Vasanthakumar G, Lye WK. Nerve Injury After Surgical Excision of Mandibular Third Molars Under Local Anesthesia: An Audit. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019; 18 (2): 307-313. doi: 10.1007/s12663-018-1151-y.

  9. Tantanapornkul W, Mavin D, Prapaiphittayakun J, Phipatboonyarat N, Julphantong W. Accuracy of panoramic radiograph in assessment of the relationship between mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Open Dent J. 2016; 10: 322-329. doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010322.

  10. Mohanty R, Rout P, Singh V. Preoperative Anatomic Evaluation of the Relationship Between Inferior Alveolar Nerve Canal and Impacted Mandibular Third Molar in a Population of Bhubaneswar, Odisha, Using CBCT: A Hospital-Based Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020; 19 (2): 257-262. doi: 10.1007/s12663-019-01193-1.

  11. Saraydar-Baser R, Dehghani-Tafti M, Navab-Azam A, Ezoddini-Ardakani F, Nayer S, Safi Y, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic value of CBCT and Digital Panoramic Radiography with surgical findings to determine the proximity of an impacted third mandibular molar to the inferior alveolar nerve canal. J Med Life. 2015; 8 (Spec Iss 3): 83-89.

  12. Gu L, Zhu C, Chen K, Liu X, Tang Z. Anatomic study of the position of the mandibular canal and corresponding mandibular third molar on cone-beam computed tomography images. Surg Radiol Anat. 2018; 40 (6): 609-614. doi: 10.1007/s00276-017-1928-6.

  13. Meniz GCM. El Diagnóstico por imagen en la prevención de lesiones del nervio dentario en la cirugía del tercer molar: estudio descriptivo-comparativo entre la ortopantomografía y la tomografía transversal. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; 1995.

  14. Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990; 28 (1): 20-25.

  15. Palma-Carrió C, García-Mira B, Larrazabal-Morón C, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Radiographic signs associated with inferior alveolar nerve damage following lower third molar extraction. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010; 15 (6): e886-90. doi: 10.4317/medoral.15.e886.

  16. Uzun C, Sumer AP, Sumer M. Assessment of the reliability of radiographic signs on panoramic radiographs to determine the relationship between mandibular third molars and the inferior alveolar canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020; 129 (3): 260-271. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2019.09.008.

  17. Patel PS, Shah JS, Dudhia BB, Butala PB, Jani YV, Macwan RS. Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation. Indian J Dent Res. 2020; 31 (1): 91-102. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_540_18.

  18. Lee B, Park Y, Ahn J, Chun J, Park S, Kim M, et al. Assessment of the proximity between the mandibular third molar and inferior alveolar canal using preoperative 3D-CT to prevent inferior alveolar nerve damage. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 37 (1): 30. doi: 10.1186/s40902-015-0030-4.

  19. Saha N, Kedarnath NS, Singh M. Orthopantomography and cone-beam computed tomography for the relation of inferior alveolar nerve to the impacted mandibular third molars. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 9 (1): 4-9. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_138_18.

  20. Shaabaninejad H, Akbari-Sari A, Mobinizadeh MR, Rafiei S, Mehrabi-Sari A, Safi Y. The efficacy of CBCT for diagnosis and treatment of oral and maxillofacial disorders: a systematic review. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2013; 25 (489): 354-365.

  21. Suazo-Galdames I, Zavando-Matamala D, Cantín López M. Canal mandibular accesorio: análisis de su prevalencia y aspecto imagenológico. Av Odontoestomatol. 2011; 27 (2): 85-90.

  22. Deppe H, Ritschl LM, Kleinschmidt J, Wagenpfeil S, Sculean A. Contiguity between the mandibular canal and the mandibular third molar in panoramic tomography compared with cone beam computed tomography: a topographic analysis. Quintessence Int. 2019; 50 (6): 470-477. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a42485.

  23. Roca-Piqué L, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C, Félez-Gutiérrez J. Técnicas radiológicas para la identificación anatómica del conducto dentario inferior respecto al tercer molar inferior. An Odontoestomatol. 1995; (2): 44-48. Disponible en: http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/25985

  24. Quirino de Almeida-Barros R, Bezerra-de Melo N, de Macedo-Bernardino Í, Arêa Leão Lopes Araújo-Arruda MJ, Meira-Bento P. Association between impacted third molars and position of the mandibular canal: a morphological analysis using cone-beam computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 56 (10): 952-955. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.10.280.

  25. Khojastepour L, Khaghaninejad MS, Hasanshahi R, Forghani M, Ahrari F. Does the Winter or Pell and Gregory classification system indicate the apical position of impacted mandibular third molars? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77 (11): 2222.e1-2222.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.06.004.

  26. Tudtiam T, Leelarungsun R, Khoo LK, Chaiyasamut T, Arayasantiparb R, Wongsirichat N. The study of inferior alveolar canal at the lower third molar apical region with cone beam computed tomography. J Clin Med Res. 2019; 11 (5): 353-359. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3794.

  27. Rytkonen K, Venta I. Distance between mandibular canal and third molar root among 20-year-old subjects. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22 (7): 2505-2509.

  28. Shokry SM, Alshaib SA, Al Mohaimeed ZZ, Ghanimah F, Altyebe MM, Alenezi MA, et al. Assessment of the inferior alveolar nerve canal course among saudis by cone beam computed tomography (Pilot study). J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2019; 18 (3): 452-458. doi: 10.1007/s12663-018-1167-3.

  29. Sinha P, Pai A. Assessment of proximity of impacted mandibular third molar roots to the mandibular canal using intra oral periapical radiography and cone-beam computerized tomography: A comparative study. Int Dent Med J Adv Res. 2015; 1 (1): 1-5.

  30. George AL, Panicker P, Johny J, Bhaskar M, Jacob BM, Zulthana HHH. Reliability of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Comparison with Panoramic Radiography to Predict the Anatomical Relationship of Inferior Alveolar Nerve with Mandibular Third Molar: A Radiological and Clinical Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020; 12 (Suppl 1): S367-S372.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com