2024, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Acta Ortop Mex 2024; 38 (2)
Partial exchange of components in chronic hip infection
Martínez W, Tillet F, Bochatey E, Lopreite F
Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 95-100
PDF size: 206.98 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: one- or two-stage total revision is considered the gold standard for the treatment of hip arthroplasty with chronic infection. However, during the removal of a fixed prosthetic component, the host bone may be damaged, making definitive prosthetic reimplantation difficult.
Objective: we present a series of patients treated for chronic periprosthetic hip infection with preservation of one fixed component.
Material and methods: this study included 12 patients with hip arthroplasty and chronic periprosthetic infection scheduled for one or two-stage partial replacement with retention of a fixed component between June 2015 and January 2021. The minimum follow-up period was 2 years (mean, 4.08 years). None of the 12 patients in this series was lost to follow-up. We evaluated the evolution through clinical examination, Harris Hip Score, laboratory and radiological studies.
Results: at a mean follow-up of 4.08 years after prosthetic reimplantation, two of the 12 patients had recurrence of infection (16.6%), and the mean Harris hip score reached 63.6 points at the last follow-up assessment.
Conclusions: fixed implant preservation may be an acceptable option for patients with chronic periprosthetic hip infection when removal of the fixed component results in significant bone loss compromising future reimplantation. However, more studies are required on this treatment method.
REFERENCES
Gundtoft PH, Overgaard S, Schonheyder HC, Moller JK, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Pedersen A. The "true" incidence of surgically treated deep prosthetic joint infection after 32,896 primary total hip arthroplasties: a prospective cohort study. Acta Orthop. 2015; 86: 326-34. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1011983.
Maradit KH, Larson DR, Crowson CS, Kremers W, Washington R, Steiner C et al. Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 1386-97. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.01141.
Pappas MA, Spindler KP, Hu B, Higuera-Rueda CA, Rothberg MB. Volume and outcomes of joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2022; 37: 2128-33. Available in: https://doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.011
Shohat N, Goswami K, Tan TL, Yayac M, Soriano A, Sousa R, et al. 2020 Frank Stinchfield Award: Identifying who will fail following irrigation and debridement for prosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-b(7_Supple_B): 11-19. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1628.R1.
Winkler T, Trampuz A, Hardt S, Janz V, Kleber C, Perka C. Periprosthetic infection after hip arthroplasty. Orthopade. 2014; 43(1): 70-8. doi: https://doi: 10.1007/s00132-013-2132-y.
Nguyen M, Sukeik M, Zahar A, Nizam I, Haddad FS. One-stage exchange arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip and knee joint infections. Open Orthop J. 2016; 10: 646-53. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010646.
Sukeik M, Haddad FS. Two-stage procedure in the treatment of late chronic hip infections–spacer implantation. Int J Med Sci. 2009; 6(5): 253-7. Available in: https://doi:10.7150/ijms.6.253
Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury T. Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35: S79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030.
Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF. Proceedings of the International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(11): 1450-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.33135.
Parvizi J, Gehrke T. International consensus on periprosthetic joint infection: let cumulative wisdom be a guide. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(6): 441. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00023.
McPherson EJ, Woodson C, Holtom P, Roidis N, Shufelt C, Patzakis M. Periprosthetic total hip infection: outcomes using a staging system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (403): 8-15.
DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976; (121): 20-32.
Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; (141): 17-27.
Hart A, Hernandez NM, Abdel MP, Mabry TM, Hanssen AD, Perry KI. Povidone-iodine wound lavage to prevent infection after revision total hip and knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 2,884 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019; 101(13): 1151-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01152.
Brown NM, Cipriano CA, Moric M, Sporer SM, Valle CJ Della. Dilute Betadine lavage before closure for the prevention of acute postoperative deep periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(1): 27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.034.
Diaz-Ledezma C, Higuera CA, Parvizi J. Success after treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: a delphi-based international multidisciplinary consensus infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471(7): 2374-82.
Mayes W, Edwards P, Mears S. Management of severe proximal femur bone loss with a modular articulating antibiotic spacer. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2019; 10: 2151459319847399. doi: 10.1177/2151459319847399.
Crawford DA, Berend KR, Morris MJ, Adams JB, Lombardi AV. Partial 2-stage exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty: an updated report. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34(12): 3048-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.001.
Yishake M, Tang L, Chen X, Wang Y, He R. Partial two-stage exchange: an alternative method for infected total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1): 686. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04550-9.
El-Husseiny M, Haddad F. The role of highly selective implant retention in the infected hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474(10): 2157-63. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4936-7.
EVIDENCE LEVEL
IV, serie de casos.