medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica

2023, Number 48

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2023; 12 (48)

Cognitive flexibility and academic performance in firts-year medical students

Jaimes MAL, Fossion R, Flores LJ, Caraveo-Anduaga JJ

Language: Spanish
References: 43
Page: 41-51
PDF size: 382.23 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Various investigations have shown that cognitive flexibility predicts the academic performance of preschool and school children, but only a few of them have shown the participation of cognitive flexibility in the academic performance of university students.
Objective: To analyze the association between cognitive flexibility and academic performance of first-year medical students; in addition to some socioeconomic problebackground that influences cognitive development and academic performance.
Method: In a sample of 406 first-year medical students, we evaluated cognitive flexibility (with the WisConPC computer program) and socioeconomic background as factors associated with the academic performance of medical students with multiple linear regression analysis.
Results: Indicated that cognitive flexibility and sociocultural context are factors associated with general academic performance, particularly in biomedical subjects.
Conclusions: The findings of this study have implications for the teaching-learning process of biological and chemical sciences since teachers can promote cognitive flexibility using didactic strategies aimed at the development and use of mental operations that imply the formulation of inferences and the application of proportional, logical, and probabilistic reasoning, thus contributing to the construction and transformation of the students’ knowledge.


REFERENCES

  1. Diamond A. Executive Functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64(1):135-68.

  2. Laureiro-Martínez D, Brusoni S. Cognitive flexibility andadaptive decision-making: Evidence from a laboratory studyof expert decision makers. Strateg Manag J. 2018;39(4):1031-58. doi.org/10.1002/smj.2774

  3. Dong X, Du X, Qi B. Conceptual knowledge influences decisionmaking differently in individuals with high or lowcognitive flexibility: An ERP study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(8).doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158875

  4. Yuan P, Raz N. Prefrontal cortex and executive functionsin healthy adults: a meta-analysis of structural neuroimagingstudies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;42:180-92. doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.005

  5. Liu J, Peng P, Luo L. The Relation Between Family SocioeconomicStatus and Academic Achievement in China: AMeta-analysis. Educ Psychol Rev. 2020;32(1):49-76. doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.019

  6. Mansouri FA, Freedman DJ, Buckley MJ. Emergence ofabstract rules in the primate brain. Nat Rev Neurosci.2020;21(11):595-610. doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0364-5

  7. Feng X, Feng C. The Index Predicting Power and FeedbackProcessing Characteristics in the WCST. Psychol Behav Sci.2019;8(3):72-72. doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20190803.13

  8. Ionescu T. Exploring the nature of cognitive flexibility. NewIdeas Psychol 2012;30(2):190-200. doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.11.001

  9. Flores-Lázaro JC, Castillo-Preciado RE, Jiménez-MiramonteNA. Desarrollo de funciones ejecutivas, de la niñeza la juventud. An Psicol [Internet]. mayo de 2014 [citado5 de abril de 2021];30(2):463-73. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0212-97282014000200009&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  10. Peng P, Kievit RA. The Development of Academic Achievementand Cognitive Abilities: A Bidirectional Perspective.Child Dev Perspect. 2020;14(1):15-20. doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12352

  11. De Clercq M, Galand B, Frenay M. Transition from highschool to university: a person-centered approach to academicachievement. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2017;32(1):39-59. doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0298-5

  12. Shala, A, Grajcevci A. The relations between socio-economicstatus (SES) and early development: empirical findings andtheoretical perspectives. Socioeconomica. 2016;5(10):309-29.

  13. Hackman DA, Gallop R, Evans GW, Farah MJ. Socioeconomicstatus and executive function: Developmental trajectoriesand mediation. Dev Sci. 2015;18(5):686-702. doi.org/10.1111/desc.12246

  14. Magalhães S, Carneiro L, Limpo T, Filipe M. Executivefunctions predict literacy and mathematics achievements:The unique contribution of cognitive flexibility in grades2, 4, and 6. Child Neuropsychol 2020;26(7):934-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2020.1740188

  15. Yeniad N, Malda M, Mesman J, van IJzendoorn MH, PieperS. Shifting ability predicts math and reading performancein children: A meta-analytical study. Learn Individ Differ.2013;23:1-9. doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.004

  16. Au AML, Lam R, Teng Y, Lau KM, Lai MK, Chan CCH,et al. The relevance of executive functioning to academicperformance in Hong Kong adolescents. Int J on Disaband Human Develop. 2011;10(3):179-85. doi.org/10.1515/ijdhd.2011.031

  17. Follmer DJ. Executive Function and Reading Comprehension:A Meta-Analytic Review. Educ Psychol. 2018;53(1):42-60. doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1309295

  18. Latzman RD, Elkovitch N, Young J, Clark LA. The contributionof executive functioning to academic achievementamong male adolescents. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol.2010;32(5):455-62. doi.org/10.1080/13803390903164363

  19. Li J, Zhao Y, Zhou S, Pu Y, He H, Zhao M. Set‐shifting abilityis specifically linked to high‐school science and math achievementin Chinese adolescents. PsyCh J. 2020;9(3):327-38.doi.org/10.1002/pchj.328

  20. Martínez EB, Harb SL, Torres MM. Funciones ejecutivasen estudiantes universitarios que presentan bajo y altorendimiento académico. Psicol Desde El Caribe [Internet].2006;(18):109-38. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=21301806

  21. Gutiérrez-Ruiz K, Paternina J, Zakzuk S, Mendez S, CastilloA, Payares L, Peñate A. Las funciones ejecutivas como predictorasdel rendimiento académico de estudiantes universitarios.PSE [Internet]. 23 de noviembre de 2021 [citado 9 demayo de 2023];12(3):161-74. Disponible en: https://journals.uco.es/psye/article/view/13972.

  22. Guevara MA, Cruz Aguilar MA, Hernández González M,Amezcua Gutierrez C. WisConPC: Programa Computacionalque Evalúa Funciones Ejecutivas. En InternationalInstitute of Informatics and Cybernetics; 2017. p. 58-61. Disponibleen: https://www.iiis.org/CDs2017/CD2017Spring/PapersC1.htm#/

  23. Uddin LQ. Cognitive and behavioral flexibility: neural mechanismsand clinical considerations. Nat Rev Neurosci.2021;22(3):167-79. doi.org/10.1038/s41583-021-00428-w

  24. Eling P, Derckx K, Maes R. On the historical and conceptualbackground of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test.Brain Cogn.2008;67(3):247-53. doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.006

  25. Faustino B, Oliveira J, Lopes P. Normative scores of the WisconsinCard Sorting Test in a sample of the adult Portuguesepopulation. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022;29(4):767-74.doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1810040

  26. Greve KW, Stickle TR, Love JM, Bianchini KJ, Stanford MS.Latent structure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A confirmatoryfactor analytic study. Arch Clin Neuropsychol.2005;20(3):355-64. doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2004.09.004

  27. Miranda AR, Franchetto Sierra J, Martínez Roulet A, RivaderoL, Serra SV, Soria EA. Age, education and gendereffects on Wisconsin card sorting test: standardization, reliabilityand validity in healthy Argentinian adults. AgingNeuropsychol Cogn. 2019; 27(6) 807-825. doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2019.1693491

  28. Feng X, Perceval GJ, Feng W, Feng C. High CognitiveFlexibility Learners Perform Better in Probabilistic RuleLearning. Front Psychol. 2020;11. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00415

  29. Somsen RJM, Van der Molen MW, Richard Jennings J, vanBeek B. Wisconsin Card Sorting in adolescents: analysis ofperformance, response times and heart rate. Acta Psychol.2000;104(2):227-57. doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00030-5

  30. Rodríguez-Hernández CF, Cascallar E, Kyndt E. Socio-economicstatus and academic performance in higher education:A systematic review. Educ Res Rev. 2020;29:100305.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100305

  31. Asociación Mexicana de Agencias de Inteligencia de Mercadoy Opinión. Nivel Socioeconómico AMAI 2018. Disponibleen: https://www.amai.org/NSE/index.php?queVeo=2018

  32. Gaceta Facultad de Medicina. Lineamientos para la evaluacióndel alumnado en la primera fase de la Licenciatura deMédico Cirujano [Internet]. Sec. Año II Numero especialsep 14, 2014. Disponible en: https://fisiologia.facmed.unam.mx/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Lineamientos-para-la-evaluación-del-alumnado-en-la-primera-fase-de-la-Licenciatura-de-Médico-Cirujano-Consejo-Técnico-2014.pdf

  33. Kuhn D. What is Scientific Thinking and How Does it Develop?In: Goswami U, editor. Handbook of Childhood CognitiveDevelopment. Blackwell; 2010. p. 497–523.

  34. Rosen ML, Hagen MP, Lurie LA, Miles ZE, Sheridan MA,Meltzoff AN, et al. Cognitive Stimulation as a MechanismLinking Socioeconomic Status with Executive Function: ALongitudinal Investigation. Child Dev. 2020;91(4): e762-79.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13315

  35. Bradley RH, Corwyn RF. Socioeconomic status and childdevelopment. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:371-99. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233

  36. Faroh AC de. Cognición en el adolescente según Piaget yVygotski. ¿Dos caras de la misma moneda? Bol Acad PaulPsicol [Internet]. 2007 [citado 8 de mayo de 2023];XXVII(2):148-66. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=94627214

  37. Pozo JI. Más allá del cambio conceptual: el aprendizaje dela ciencia como cambio representacional. Enseñ Las CiencRev Investig Exp Didácticas. 1999;17(3):513-20.

  38. Vosniadou S, Ioannides C. From conceptual developmentto science education: a psychological point of view. Int J SciEduc. 1998;20(10):1213-30.

  39. Kwon YJ, Lawson AE. Linking Brain Growth with the Developmentof Scientific Reasoning Ability and Conceptual Changeduring Adolescence. J Res Sci Teach. 2000;37(1):44-62.

  40. Rhodes SM, Booth JN, Palmer LE, Blythe RA, DelibegovicM, Wheate NJ. Executive functions predict conceptuallearning of science. Br J Dev Psychol. 2016;34(2):261-75. doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12129

  41. Abdullah MNS, Karpudewan M, Tanimale BM. Executivefunction of the brain and its influences on understandingof physics concept. Trends Neurosci Educ. 2021;24:100159.doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2021.100159

  42. Mason L, Zaccoletti S. Inhibition and Conceptual Learningin Science: a Review of Studies. Educ Psychol Rev.2021;33(1):181-212. doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09529-x

  43. Duit R, Treagust DF. Conceptual change: A powerful frameworkfor improving science teaching and learning. Int JSci Educ. 2003;25(6):671-88.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com