medigraphic.com

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Enfermería Universitaria 2018; 15 (3)

Psychosocial risk factors associated to pre-eclampsia among mexican women: a comparative analysis in three States

Torres-Lagunas MA, Vega-Morales EG, Vinalay-Carrillod I, Cortaza-Ramírez L, Alfonso-Gutiérrez L

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 226-243
PDF size: 344.41 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To comparatively analyze the psychosocial risk factors associated to pre-eclampsia among Mexican women living in three States.
Method: This is a cases and controls study with 336 pregnant women with and without pre-eclampsia (130 from the State of Mexico, 114 from the state of Yucatan, and 92 from the state of Veracruz). Two questionnaires were administered, and 5 previously validated Likert type scales were used. A statistical comparative analysis was performed using SPSS v.20 software. Quantitative variables were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis procedure, categorical variables with frequencies calculation, and the associated risk with odds ratios in the 95% confidence interval. The associated risk was further adjusted through logistic regression (α = 0.05).
Results: The analysis revealed a mild level of violence in all three States. States which reflected more frequency of violence risks were Mexico and Veracruz (OR: 3.53; IC 95%: 1.13 - 10.97). Depression was a significant finding associated to pre-eclampsia. A 1 to 2 times higher risk of associated pre-eclampsia was found among pregnant women with some degree of depression in the State of Mexico (OR: 1.66; IC 95%: 1.058 - 2.607), and this risk was 3 to 4 times higher in the presence of major depressive disorder (OR: 3.67; IC 95%: 1.23 - 10.89). Among women from the state of Veracruz who sometimes reported having depressive symptoms, the risk of pre-eclampsia association was 3 times higher (OR: 3.12; IC 95%: 1.077 - 9.083), while this risk was 7.4 times higher when these women had less than 5 prenatal assessment visits (OR: 7.42; IC 95%: 2.85 - 19.33).
Conclusions: Depression, depressive symptomatology, violence, and less-than-5 prenatal assessment visits were all identified as psychosocial risk factors associated to pre-eclampsia. These findings will support proposals for a corresponding nursing integral intervention model to address the related risk factors.


REFERENCES

  1. Sánchez E, Nava S, Morán C, et. al. Estado actual de la preeclampsia en México: de lo epidemiológicoa sus mecanismos moleculares. Rev Invest Clin. 2010; 62(3): 252-60.

  2. Jasovic E, Jasovic V. Demographic characteristics in preeclamptic women in Macedonia. Rev Med Chil.2011; 139(6): 748-54.

  3. Vargas VM, Acosta G, Moreno MA. La preeclampsia un problema de salud pública mundial. Rev ChilObstet Ginecol. 2012; 77(6): 471-6.

  4. Barrera A, Mancilla ME, Román SY, et. al. Guía de práctica clínica. Intervenciones de Enfermería en lapaciente con Preeclampsia/Eclampsia. Rev Enferm Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2013; 21(2): 91-104.

  5. López-Carbajal MJ, Manríquez M, Gálvez D, et al. Factores de riesgo asociados con preeclampsia. RevMed Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2012; 50(5): 471-6.

  6. Sánchez SE, Qiu C, Perales MT, et. al. Intimate partner violence (IPV) and preeclampsia among Peruvianwomen. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008; 137(1): 50-5.

  7. Morgan F, Calderón SA, Martínez JI, et al. Factores de riesgo asociados con preeclampsia: estudio decasos y controles. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2010; 78(3): 153-9.

  8. Benute GR, Nomura RM, Reis JS, et al. Depression during pregnancy in women with a medical disorder:risk factors and perinatal outcomes. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010; 65(11): 1127-31.

  9. Bansil P, Kuklina EV, Meikle SF, et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes among women with depression. JWomens Health (Larchmt). 2010; 19(2): 329-34.

  10. Cruz J, Hernández P, Yanes M, et al. Factores de riesgo de preeclampsia: enfoque inmunoendocrino.Parte I. Rev. cuba. med. gen. integr. 2007; 23(4): 1-6.

  11. Kurki T, Hiilesmaa V, Raitasalo R, et al. Depression and anxiety in early pregnancy and risk for preeclampsia.Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 95(4): 487-90.

  12. Qiu C, Sánchez SE, Lam N, et al. Associations of depression and depressive symptoms with preeclampsia:results from a Peruvian case-control study. BMC Womens Health. 2007; 7: 15.

  13. Zhang S, Ding Z, Liu H, et al. Association between mental stress and gestational hypertension/preeclampsia:a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013; 68(12): 825-34.

  14. Salvador-Moysen J, Martínez-López Y, Lechuga-Quinones A, et al. Situación psicosocial de las adolescentesy toxemias del embarazo. Salud Pública Mex. 2000; 42(2): 99-105.

  15. Ku E. Factores psicosociales asociados a preeclampsia en mujeres hospitalizadas en el Instituto NacionalMaterno Perinatal, agosto a octubre de 2012. Rev Peru. Epidemiol. 2014; 18(1): 1-7.

  16. Vollebregt KC, Van der Wal MF, Wolf H, et al. Is psychosocial stress in first ongoing pregnancies associatedwith pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension? BJOG: Int. j. gynecol. Obtet. 2008; (5): 607.

  17. Nasreen HE, Kabir ZN, Forsell Y, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of depressive and anxietysymptoms during pregnancy: a population based study in rural Bangladesh. BMC Womens Health.2011; 11: 22.

  18. Ruiz CM. Factores de riesgo asociados a preeclampsia en el Hospital Nacional Daniel Alcides Carrión.Callao. Abril a junio de 2010. Rev Peru Epidemiol. 2011; 15(2): 4-5.

  19. Méndez C. H Sociedad y Estratificación. Método Graffar-Méndez Castellano. Caracas: Fundacredesa;1994.

  20. Torres MA, Vega EG, Vinalay I, et al. Validación psicométrica de escalas PSS-14, AFA-R, HDRS, CES-D,EV en puérperas mexicanas con y sin preclampsia. Enferm Univ. 2015; 12(3): 122-33.

  21. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4): 385-96.

  22. González-Ramírez MT, Landero-Hernández R. Propiedades Psicométricas de la Escala de Apoyo SocialFamiliar y de Amigos (AFA-R) en una Muestra de Estudiantes. Acta de investigación psicol. 2014;4(2): 1469-80.

  23. Bagby RM, Ryder AG, Schuller DR, et al. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: has the gold standardbecome a lead weight? Am J Psychiatry. 2004; 161: 2163-77.

  24. De Snyder V, Salgado N, Maldonado M. Características psicométricas de la Escala de Depresión delCentro de Estudios Epidemiológicos en mujeres mexicanas adultas de áreas rurales. Salud PúblicaMex. 1994; 36(2): 200-9.

  25. Valdez R, Híjar MC, Salgado VN, et al. Escala de violencia e índice de severidad: una propuesta metodológicapara medir la violencia de pareja en mujeres mexicanas. Salud Pública Mex. 2006; 48:s221-s31.

  26. SSA. Norma oficial mexicana NOM-007-SSA2-2016, para la atención de la mujer durante el embarazo,parto y puerperio, y de la persona recién nacida. México: SSA; 2007. [consultado 16 noviembre2016]. Disponible en: http://bit.ly/1SCty9h

  27. SSA. Intervenciones de enfermería para el control prenatal en el primer nivel de atención. Resumende evidencias y recomendaciones. Guía de práctica clínica de enfermería. CDMX: SSA. CENETEC;2016. [consultado 21 noviembre 2016]. Disponible en: http://bit.ly/2zCUzi2

  28. Ahued JRA, Castillo CF, Uriza RB. Ginecología y obstetricia aplicadas. CDMX: El Manual Moderno;2002: P.224.

  29. Vega EG, Torres MA, Patiño V, et al. Vida cotidiana y preeclampsia: Experiencias de mujeres del Estadode México. Enferm Univ. 2016; 13(1): 12-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.REU.2015.11.006

  30. Educsa. NANDA-I NOC NIC (Versión Student 4.0) [Aplicación Móvil]. 2016. Disponible en:https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.selftising.nandanocnic.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com