medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3046 (Electronic)

2021, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Med Mil 2021; 50 (4)

Cention-N: a direct and innovative restorative option for the posterior sector

Castillo PMC, Becerra LHK, Wilches VJH

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page:
PDF size: 163.72 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Dental industry is constantly evolving regarding the realization of dental materials that improve the quality of life. However, due to the large number of these, it is essential to perform intercomparisons of biomechanical properties that define those with the best performance.
Objective: To identify the advantages and disadvantages of Cention-N restorative material with respect to composite resin, glass ionomer and amalgam.
Methods: A bibliographic search was made in the PubMed, Scielo, Semantic Scholar, ScienceDirect, Medigraphyc and Redalyc databases. The following keywords were used: Cention-N, restorative material, amalgam, composite resin, the glass ionomer; combined with Boolean AND and OR operators. Original and review articles, among other documents, were chosen to examine 4 characteristics: microfiltration, hardness, surface roughness and shear resistance. 50% of the articles are from the last 5 years.
Results: A total of 13 articles, 1 webpage and 1 book, were found according to the selection filters and research objective. The Cention-N, with respect to the other materials considered, presented a lower microfiltration score (0,28 ± 0,18); higher hardness (77 N/mm2); lower roughness (442,98 ± 62,45 nm) and higher shear strength (14,38 ± 3,88 MPa). However, it remains to evaluate its mechanical properties before abrasive procedures such as teeth whitening and at high loads such as bruxism.
Conclusion: Cention-N is a promising option as a posterior sector restorative material as it shows less microfiltration and roughness; as well as greater resistance to shear and hardness, compared to other restorative materials studied.


REFERENCES

  1. Mazumdar P, Das A, Das U. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different direct restorative materials (Silver Amalgam, Glass Ionomer Cement, Cention N), in Class II restorations using stereomicroscope: An In vitro Study. Indian J Dent Res. 2019 [acceso: 03/05/2021]; 30(2):277. Disponible en: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2019/30/2/277/259227

  2. Curiqueo A, Salamanca C, Borie E, Navarro P, Fuentes R. Evaluación de la Fuerza Masticatoria Máxima Funcional en Adultos Jóvenes Chilenos. Int J Odontostomatol. 2015 [acceso: 03/05/2021]; 9(3): 443-7. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-381X2015000300014&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

  3. Dutra TTB, Tapety ZI, Mendes RF, Moita Neto JM, Prado Júnior RR. Survival time of direct dental restorations in adults. Rev Odontol da UNESP. 2015 [acceso: 03/05/2021]; 44(4): 213-7. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772015000400213&lng=en&tlng=en

  4. Tibau AV, Grube BD. Mercury Contamination from Dental Amalgam. J Heal Pollut. 2019 [acceso: 03/05/2021]; 9(22):1-11. Disponible en: https://meridian.allenpress.com/jhp/article/doi/10.5696/2156-9614-9.22.190612/445391/Mercury-Contamination-from-Dental-Amalgam

  5. François P, Remadi A, Le Goff S, Abdel-Gawad S, Attal J-P, Dursun E. Flexural properties and dentin adhesion in recently developed self-adhesive bulk-fill materials. J Oral Sci. 2021 [acceso: 03/05/2021]; 63(2):139-44. Disponible en: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/josnusd/63/2/63_20-0448/_article

  6. Naz F, Samad Khan A, Kader MA, Al Gelban LOS, Mousa NMA, Asiri RSH, et al. Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials. Saudi Dent J. 2020 [acceso: 03/05/2021]; 33(7):666-73. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1013905219311915

  7. Ruengrungsom C, Burrow MF, Parashos P, Palamara JEA. Evaluation of F, Ca, and P release and microhardness of eleven ion-leaching restorative materials and the recharge efficacy using a new Ca/P containing fluoride varnish. J Dent. 2020[acceso: 05/05/2021]; 102:103474. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0300571220302207

  8. Ivoclar Vivadent. Cention N. 2021 [acceso: 03/05/2021]. Disponible en: https://highlights.ivoclarvivadent.com/dentist/es-latin/cention-n

  9. Monterde Coronel ME, Delgado Ruíz JM, Martínez Rico M, Guzmán Félix CE, Espejel Mejía M. Desmineralización-remineralización del esmalte dental. Rev ADM. 2002 [acceso: 23/07/2021]; LIX(6): 220-222. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/adm/od-2002/od026g.pdf

  10. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int. 2000[acceso: 10/05/2021]; 31(3):165-79. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11203922

  11. Sharma A, Babaji P, Sujith R, Yadav TG, Pitalia D, Apoorva K. Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 [acceso: 03/05/2021]; 21(6):691-5. Disponible en: https://www.thejcdp.com/doi/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2837

  12. Mazumdar P, Das A, Guha C. Comparative evaluation of hardness of different restorative materials (restorative gic, cention n, nanohybrid composite resin and silver amalgam) - an in vitro study. Int J Adv Res. 2018 [acceso: 03/05/2021]; 6(3):826-32. Disponible en: http://www.journalijar.com/article/22959/comparative-evaluation-of-hardness-of-different-restorative-materials-(restorative-gic,--cention-n,-nanohybrid-composite-resin-and-silver-amalgam)-an-in-vitro-study/

  13. Di Gianfrancesco A. Materials for Ultra-Supercritical and Advanced Ultra-Supercritical Power Plants. En: Di Giangrancesco A, Masuyama F, Hald J, Barnard P, Roberts S, Zeiler G, et al. Materials for Ultra-Supercritical and Advanced Ultra-Supercritical Power Plants. Elsevier; 2017. p. 197-245. [acceso: 03/05/2021]. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/C20140048265

  14. Jafari Navimipour E, Ajami AA, Savadi Oskoee S, Abed Kahnamou M, Bahari M, Shojaei SM. Surface Roughness of Different Composite Resins After Application of 15% Carbamide Peroxide and Brushing with Toothpaste: An In-Vitro Study. Front Dent. 2019 [acceso: 03/05/2021]; 16(1):55. Disponible en: https://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/fid/article/view/1109

  15. Hedge M, Bhandary S. An evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin, using newer dentin bonding agents. J Conserv Dent. 2008 [acceso: 03/05/2021]; 11(2):71. Disponible en: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2008/11/2/71/44054




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com