medigraphic.com
ISSN 2307-2113 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED)

2021, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED) 2021; 32 (4)

Influence of the elements communication channels, social system and time on the diffusion of the Electronic Health Record

Souza GD, Rodrigues BP, Barbosa de Castro FD, Barbosa EA, da Costa CF, de Souza BS, Bezerra CR

Language: Portugués
References: 33
Page: 1-25
PDF size: 349.35 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study was to analyze the influence of the elements communication channels, social system and time on the diffusion of the Electronic Health Record in Brasil. A qualitative case study was conducted based on innovation diffusion theory, which contains 17 interviews and observations of the daily work of eight family health teams involved in the use of technology in a city of western Minas Gerais. The data were processed by thematic-categorial content analysis and systematized with the software Atlas Ti. Communication means and interpersonal communication channels were found to strengthen technology diffusion. Acceptance of the innovation was fostered by the nurse, who encouraged and mobilized the team in this direction. It was observed that some factors contributed to resistance. For example, doctors and other professionals with longer work hours considered that the technology was complex and the time available insufficient. Diffusion of technology was also affected by strategies deriving from the social system context: creation of typing scales, reliefs and agreements, among others. Some challenges have emerged: coexistence of technologies related to the Electronic Health Record and the clinical record, conflicts, structural and training deficiencies, and underused technology. It was found that the elements communication channels, time and social system influence innovation diffusion, mainly by fostering its adoption in the context studied.


REFERENCES

  1. Ministério da Saúde (Brasil). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento deAtenção Básica. e-SUS Atenção Básica: Manual do Sistema com ProntuárioEletrônico do Cidadão. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção àSaúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica; 2018.

  2. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovation. New York: The Free Press; 2003.

  3. Starmann E. Examining diffusion to understand the how of SASA!, a violenceagainst women and HIV prevention intervention in Uganda. BMC Public Health.2018 [acesso: 15/01/2021];18(616). Disponível em:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5508-4

  4. Holden RJ, Asan O, Wozniak, E, Flynn KE, Scanlon MC. Nurses’ perceptions,acceptance, and use of a novel in-room pediatric ICU technology: testing anexpanded technology acceptance model. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 [acesso:15/01/2021];11(4):420-8. Disponível em:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-016-0388-y

  5. Zhang X, Yu P, Yan , Spil ITA M. Using diffusion of innovation theory tounderstand the factors impacting patient acceptanceand use of consumer e-healthinnovations: a case study in a primary care clinic. BMC Health Serv Res.2015;15(71). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0726-2

  6. Olsson A, Skovdahl K, Engström M. Using diffusion of innovation theory todescribe perceptions of a passive positioning alarm among persons with milddementia: a repeated interview study. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(3). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0183-8

  7. Sligo J, Gauld R, Roberts V, Villa L. A Literature Review for Large-Scale HealthInformation System Project Planning, Implementation and Evaluation. Int JMedInform. 2017;97:86-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.09.007

  8. Dorr D, Cohen D, Milstein J. Data-Driven Diffusion Of Innovations: Successes AndChallenges In 3 Large-Scale Innovative Delivery Models. Health Aff. 2018;37(2):257-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1133

  9. Young B. A systematic review: effectiveness of mass media campaigns forreducing alcohol-impaired driving and alcohol-related crashes. BMC Public Health.2018;53(3):14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2088-4

  10. Bardin L. Análise de Conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70; 2016.

  11. 11.Takahashi B, Tandoc Ec. Media sources, credibility, and perceptions of science:Learning about how people learn about science. Public Underst Sci.2016;72(2):674-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515574986

  12. Cavalcante R. Informatização da Atenção Primária a Saúde no Brasil: A rede deatores. Rev Brasil Enf. 2020;72(2):354-61. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0381

  13. Silva TIM. Difusão da inovação e-SUS Atenção Básica em equipes de saúde dafamília. Rev Bras Enf. 2018; 71(6): 3121-8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0053

  14. 14.Walsh-childers K, Odedina F, et al. Choosing Channels, Sources, and Contentfor Communicating Prostate Cancer Information to Black Men: System Review ofthe Literature. Am J Men's Health. 2018;12(5):1728-45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318786669

  15. Brady E, Segar J, Sanders C. You get to know the people and whether they’retalking sense or not: Negotiating trust on health-related forums. Soc Sci Med.2016;162:151-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.029

  16. Dadich A, Hassan Hosseinzadeh H. Communication Channels to PromoteEvidence-Based Practice: A Survey of Primary Care Clinicians to DeterminePerceived Effects. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(62):https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0134-z

  17. Oliveira P. Peer Adoption and Development of Health Innovations by Patients:National Representative Study of 6204 Citizens. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(3).DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196 / 11726

  18. Mohammadi MM, Poursaberi R, Salahshoor MR. Evaluating the adoption ofevidence-based practice using Rogers’s diffusion of innovation theory: a modeltesting study. Health Promot Perspect. 2018 [acesso: 15/01/2021];8(1):25-322.Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797305/

  19. Cavalcante RB. Rede de atores e suas influências na informatização da atençãobásica a saúde no Brasil. Interface. 2019;23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1590/interface.180364

  20. Gava M, Palhares D, Ferreira LS, Mota Ela. Incorporação da tecnologia dainformação na Atenção Básica do SUS no Nordeste do Brasil: expectativas eexperiências. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2016;21(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015213.01062015

  21. Costa JFR, Portela MC. Percepções de gestores, profissionais e usuários acercado registro eletrônico de saúde e de aspectos facilitadores e barreiras para a suaimplementação. Cad Saúde Públ. 2018;34(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00187916

  22. Zakaria N, Yusof MAS. Understanding technology and people issues in HospitalInformation System (HIS) adoption: Case study of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. JInfect Publ Health. 2016;9:774-80. Disponível em:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2016.08.017

  23. Rago CAP, Zucchi P. Prontuário Eletrônico do Paciente: como a teoria dadifusão de inovações pode colaborar na sua implantação. J Health Inform. 2017[acesso: 15/01/2021];9(2):57-61. Disponível em: http://www.jhisbis.saude.ws/ojs-jhi/index.php/jhi-sbis/article/view/464

  24. Cucciniello M, Lapsley I, Nasi G, Pagliari C. Understanding key factors affectingelectronic medical record impementation: a sociotechnical approach. BMC HealthServ Res. 2015;15(268). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12913-015-0928-7

  25. Vagnani G, Volpe L. Innovation attributes and managers' decisions about theadoption of innovations in organizations: A meta-analytical review. Internat JInnov Stud. 2017;1(2):107-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2017.10.001

  26. Gomes PAR. Prontuário Eletrônico do Cidadão: Instrumento Para o Cuidado deEnfermagem. Rev Fund Care Online. 2019 [acesso: 15/01/2021];11(5):1226-35.Disponível em:http://www.ciberindex.com/index.php/ps/article/view/P12261235

  27. Veloso AF, Varanda MP. Difusão de inovação e atores-chave na ESF. Cad SaúdeColet. 2017;25(1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-462x201700010099

  28. Ferreira AMD, Oliveira JLC, Camillo NRS, Reis GAX, Évora YDM, Matsuda LM.Percepções dos profissionais de enfermagem acerca do uso da informatização parasegurança do paciente. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2019;40. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180140

  29. Kneale L, Demiris G. Lack of diversity in personal health record evaluationswith older adult participants: a systematic review of literature. J Innov HealthInform. 2017;23(4). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14236/jhi.v23i4.881

  30. Wu CHK. How do paper and electronic records compare for completeness? Athree centre study. Eye. 2018 [acesso: 15/01/2021];32(7):1232-6. Disponível em:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41433-018-0065-8

  31. Tsai CH. Effects of Electronic health record implementation and barriers toadoption and use: a scoping review and qualitative analysis of the content. Life.2020;10(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life10120327

  32. Jales ED, Jales RD, Gomes JGN. O PMAQ-AB enquanto ferramenta de gestão dotrabalho em saúde a partir das percepções dos gestores e profissionais de saúde.Rev Saúde e Ciência. 2017;6(3):77-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35572/rsc.v6i3.189

  33. Ten Haken I, Ben Allouch S, van Harten WH. O uso de tecnologias médicasavançadas em casa: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. BMC Public Health.2018;18(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5123-4




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com