Castro-Apodaca FJ, Lugo-Ayala SA, Murillo-Llanes, Joel; González-Quintero P, Magaña Gómez JA, Magaña OD, Cháidez FYL, Peña GGM

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 55-58
PDF size: 169.31 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this document is to describe the clinical case of a 33-year-old multipregnant patient who attends the family planning clinic of the Hospital de la Mujer due to pelvic pain of 3 months of evolution secondary to a failed attempt to remove the copper T intrauterine device. in a private setting, for which grade 2 translocated intrauterine device was found, after which bilateral tubal occlusion was performed for satisfied parity.

REFERENCES

1. Organization WH. Family planning: a globalhandbook for providers: evidence-based guidancedeveloped through worldwide collaboration. 2018.

2. Long S, Colson L. Intrauterine Device Insertionand Removal. Prim Care.2021;48(4):531-44.

3. García-López BI, Pichardo-Cuevas M,Meza-López ME, Contreras-Carreto NA.Manejo de dispositivo intrauterino traslocado.Med Sur. 2012;19(1):7-9.

4. Soto-Blanco F, Delgado-Martín AE, Becerra-Martínez ML, Guillamón-Sánchez M, Jiménez-Riberes S. DIU en atención primaria.Medicina Integral. 2003;41(3):162-9.

5. Garduza SCL, Ponce GEB, Flores JLC, delOlmo ARC. Migracion de dispositivo intrauterinoa pared abdominal. Reporte de uncaso. Salud en Tabasco. 2017;23(1-2):48-51.

6. Abonia CH, Gomez MC, Mosquera JE, TorregrozaMA, Garcia D, Usubillaga F. Translocaciónde dispositivo intrauterino de cobrea vejiga y litiasis vesical secundaria–reportede caso clínico. Urol Colomb.2020;29(01):58-62.

7. Gálvez-Valdovinos R, Hernández-López R,López-Ambriz G, Ramme-Cruzat C. Dispositivointrauterino con Levonorgestrel translocadoasociado con ectasia ureteropielocalicialbilateral. Ginecol Obstet Mex.2015;83:635-40.

8. Veloso D, Lobos G, Aliste N, Rojas C, GarcíaP, Patrick MP. Control ecográfico post inserciónde dispositivo intrauterino. Rev ChilObstet Ginecol. 2011;76(1):15-20.