Berdú SJ, Chacón PT, Fonseca AA, Cutiño CRM

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page:
PDF size: 261.80 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death in developed and developing countries, within them; coronary heart disease (CD) is the single most frequent cause of death worldwide.
Objective: to design an index to predict the risk of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department in patients with acute chest pain.
Method: a prospective logistic regression cohort study was carried out in patients with chest pain treated in the emergency department of the General University Hospital "Carlos Manuel de Céspedes" of the Bayamo municipality, Granma, who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, determining the Clinical variables related to the risk of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department in patients with acute chest pain.
Results: in the clinical profile of the patients in the cohort, the majority had a history of ischemic heart disease (220 for 71.0%) and the presence of typical pain is distinguished in the highest percentage of patients (183 for 59, 0), all the variables of the clinical profile were significantly related to the appearance of acute myocardial infarction. Typical pain was the most significant almost four times when compared to patients with non-typical pain (OR: 3.894; CI: 2.302-6.590; p: 0.000). The Hosmer and Lemeshow test shows that the data fit the model (p = 0.441). The analysis of the internal validity of the index to predict the risk of developing acute myocardial infarction results in a validity index of 73.08%. Similarly, the sensitivity was adequate (87.75%). The very high negative predictive value (95.18%) indicates that the index is unlikely to classify individuals who become ill as low risk. The validity of content and presentation according to expert opinions, the criterion prevails that the index meets the established requirements.
Conclusions: the clinical profile of the investigated patients was significantly related to the risk of acute myocardial infarction, where the value of typical chest pain stands out, and secondly, the designed index, based on the clinical profile of the patients, allows predicting the appearance of acute myocardial infarction with adequate validity.

REFERENCES

1. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart disease and stroke-2019 update. A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019; 139: e56-e528.

2. Dirección de Registros Médicos y Estadísticas de Salud. Anuario Estadístico de Salud. Cuba 2018-2019. [Internet]. La Habana: MINSAP; 2020]. Disponible en: https://temas.sld.cu/estadisticassalud/.

3. Santos M, Góngora DR, Parra JL, Rabert AR. Factores predictivos de mortalidad hospitalaria en el infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST. Cor Salud 2018; 10(3): 202-210.

4. Anderson JL, Morrow DA. Acute Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:2053-64.

5. Januzzi JL, McCarthy CP. Evaluating Chest Pain in the Emergency Department. JACC 2018; 71(6): 617-19.

6. Pérez JA, Mérigo C, Montoya C, Hernández KS. La unidad de dolor torácico en el servicio de urgencias y el uso de la escala PRETEST y troponina I ultrasensible. Nuevo abordaje con una vieja herramienta. An Med (Mex) 2018; 63(1): 14-19.

7. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Allan SF, Chaitman BR, Bax J, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2019; 40(3): 237-69.

8. Gil Román JJ. Análisis de la actividad de una unidad funcional de dolor torácico vinculada a un servicio de urgencias hospitalario: condicionantes clínicos y organizativos. [Internet]. España: Universidad de Oviedo; 2016. [citado 19/12/2020]. Disponible en: https://digibuo.uniovi.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10651/39412/Gil%20Roman.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y.

9. Ibañez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunez MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci Ch, Bueno H. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018; 39(2): 119-77.

10. Sabatine M, Cannon CP. Approach to the Patient with Chest Pain. In: Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO, Braunwald E, eds. Braunwald's Heart Disease. A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Filadelfia: Saunders; 2015. p. 1057-67.

11. Brown A, Dingle HE, Brywczynski J, McKinney JJ, Slovis CM. The 5 Deadly Causes of Chest Pain: Recognizing the potentially lethal causes other than myocardial infarction. JEMS 2017; 42(1): 55-63.

12. Anderson JL. ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction and complications of myocardial infarction. In: Goldman L, Schafer AI, eds. Goldman's Cecil medicine. 25th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2016. p. 441-56.

13. Mauro V. Tratamiento antitrombótico en los síndromes coronarios agudos y fibrilación auricular. Rev Argent Cardiol 2020; 88(1): 72-75.

14. Gómez Polo JC, Vivas D, Roldán I. Indicación del tratamiento con doble antiagregación más allá del año. A quién y porqué? Rev Esp Card 2017; 17(B): 24-9.

15. Mahmoud A, Gad M, Elgendy A, Elgendy I, Bavry A. Efficacy and safety of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials. European Heart Journal 2019; 40(7): 607-17.

16. Targets G. Standards of medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020; 43(1): 66- 76.

17. Avogaro A, Fadini GP. Microvascular complications in diabetes: a growing concern for cardiologists. Int J Cardiol 2019; 291: 29-35.

18. Almourani R, Chinnakotla B, Patel R, Romayne L, Sowers J. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: an Update. Curr Diab Rep 2019; 19(12): 161.

19. Tyrrell D, Goldstein DR. Abstract 12990: Aging Enhances Vascular Mitochondrial Dysfunction Prior to Hyperlipidemia to Accelerate Atherosclerosis. Circulation. [Internet]. 2019 [citado 5/12/2020]; 140(suppl 1). Disponible en: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.140.suppl_1.12990.

20. Iurciuc S, Cimpean AM, Mitu F, Heredea R, Iurciuc M. Vascular aging and subclinical atherosclerosis: why such a »,» ®,® §,§ ­,­ ¹,¹ ²,² ³,³ ß,ß Þ,Þ þ,þ ×,× Ú,Ú ú,ú Û,Û û,û Ù,Ù ù,ù ¨,¨ Ü,Ü ü,ü Ý,Ý ý,ý ¥,¥ ÿ,ÿ ¶,¶ never ending »,» ®,® §,§ ­,­ ¹,¹ ²,² ³,³ ß,ß Þ,Þ þ,þ ×,× Ú,Ú ú,ú Û,Û û,û Ù,Ù ù,ù ¨,¨ Ü,Ü ü,ü Ý,Ý ý,ý ¥,¥ ÿ,ÿ ¶,¶ and challenging story in cardiology?. Clin Interv Aging 2017; 12: 1339-45.

21. Sprockel JJ, Mantilla HJ, Cruz LC, Barón RA, Diaztagle JJ. Aplicación de las escalas de estratificación del riesgo en el diagnóstico de los síndromes coronarios agudos. Rev Col Card 2017; 24(5): 480-87.

22. Sanchis J, Bodí V, Nuñez J, Bertomeu-González V, Gómez C, Bosch MJ, et al. New risk score for patients with acute chest pain, non-ST-segment deviation, and normal troponin concentrations: a comparison with the TIMI risk score. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46(3): 443-9.

23. Castillo Moreno JA, Ramos Martín JL, Molina Laborda E, Egea Beneyto S, Ortega Bernal J. Utilidad del perfil clínico y la ergometría en la valoración del pronóstico de los pacientes ingresados por dolor torácico sin criterios de alto riesgo. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006; 59(1):12-9.

24. Sánchez M, López B, Bragulat E, Gómez-Angelats E, Jiménez S, Ortega M, et al. Triage flowchart to rule out acute coronary syndrome. Am J Emerg Med. 2007; 25(8): 865-72.

25. Romero Aniorte A. Valoración del origen coronario del dolor torácico mediante una escala sistematizada. [Internet]. España: Universidad de Murcia; 2017. [citado 12/1/2020]. Disponible en: https://www.tesisenred.net/handle/10803/462110#page=3.

26. Peral Sánchez ML, Alegret Rodríguez M, Guirado Cruz R. Estimación del riesgo cardiovascular en una población del área de salud del Policlínico Santa Clara. Medicent Electrón 2016; 20(1): 38-45.