medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-8013 (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa

2022, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med UAS 2022; 12 (4)

In vitro inhibition of the growth of enterococcus faecalis using endodontic sealers

Armenta-Molina J, Olivares-Acosta I, Candolfi-Arballo O

Language: Spanish
References: 36
Page: 299-308
PDF size: 277.15 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the inhibition of the growth of Enterococcus faecalis bacteria (ATCC® 29212™) in the presence of sealer cements (CS) used in endodontic treatments by means of in vitro experimentation. Materials and Methods: An experimental methodological design based on laboratory tests was used. The agar diffusion method was used to analyze the antibacterial activity of three CS: Endosequence (BC Sealer), AHPlus (Dentsply De Trey) and Sealapex (Kerr). The data were organized and the results were plotted. Results: The highest inhibition of bacterial growth was obtained with AHPlus cement (1.50 mm), followed by Endosequence (1.10 mm), the CS Sealapex showed very little inhibitory activity of E. faecalis (0.2 mm). Conclusion: The inhibition of the growth of E. faecalis by the presence of the CS used in endodontics was different from each other, there is significant variability in the antibacterial capacity of the CS analyzed, the findings of this study confirm the data reported in other studies, while for some cements were contrasting.


REFERENCES

  1. Sundqvist G. Bacteriological studies of necroticdental pulps [Internet]. Vol. 7. Umea,Sweden; 1976. Disponible en:http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:719968/FULLTEXT02

  2. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ.The effects of surgical exposures of dentalpulps in germ-free and conventional laboratoryrats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.1965;20:340–9.

  3. Ng Y-L, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, GulabivalaK. Outcome of primary root canaltreatment: systematic review of the literature.Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. IntEndod J. 2008;41(1):6–31.

  4. Hugh CL, Walton RE, Facer SR. Evaluationof intracanal sealer distribution with 5 differentobturation techniques. Quintessence Int.2005;36(9):721–9.

  5. American Association of Endodontists.Guide to Clinical Endodontics [Internet].2013. Disponible en:https://www.aae.org/specialty/clinical-resources/guide-clinical-endodontics/related root canal. J Dent Sci.2018;13(1):54–9.

  6. Hargreaves KM, Berman LH. Cohen´s Pathwaysof the pulp. 11a ed. St Louis, Vasa:Elsevier; 2016.

  7. Gopikrishna V, Grossman LI, Chandra BS.Grossman’s endodontic practice. [Internet].13va. Canada; 2020 [citado el 21 de enerode 2022]. 526 p. Disponible en: https://dokumen.pub/grossmans-endodontic-practice-9789389859928.html

  8. Sjögren U, Figdor D, Spĺngberg L,Sundqvist G. The antimicrobial effect of calciumhydroxide as a short-term intracanaldressing. Int Endod J. 1991;24(3):119–25.

  9. Komabayashi T, Colmenar D, Cvach N, BhatA, Primus C, Imai Y. Comprehensive reviewof current endodontic sealers. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(5):703–20.

  10. Singh G, Gupta I, Elshamy FMM, Boreak N,Homeida HE. In vitro comparison of antibacterialproperties of bioceramic-based sealer,resin-based sealer and zinc oxide eugenolbased sealer and two mineral trioxide aggregates.Eur J Dent. 2016;10(3):366–9.

  11. Hasheminia M, Razavian H, Mosleh H,Shakerian B. In vitro evaluation of the antibacterialactivity of five sealers used in rootcanal therapy. Dent Res J. 2017;14:62.

  12. Colombo M, Poggio C, Dagna A, MeraviniM-V, Riva P, Trovati F, et al. Biological andphysico-chemical properties of new root canalsealers. J Clin Exp Dent.2018;10(2):e120–6.

  13. Shin J-H, Lee D-Y, Lee S-H. Comparison ofantimicrobial activity of traditional and newdeveloped root sealers against pathogens

  14. Kharouf N, Arntz Y, Eid A, Zghal J, Sauro S,Haikel Y, et al. Physicochemical and AntibacterialProperties of Novel, Premixed CalciumSilicate-Based Sealer Compared toPowder-Liquid Bioceramic Sealer. J ClinMed. 2020;9(10):E3096.

  15. Nirupama DN, Nainan MT, Ramaswamy R,Muralidharan S, Usha HHL, Sharma R, et al.In Vitro Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Efficacyof Four Endodontic Biomaterialsagainst Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans,and Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Biomater.2014;2014:383756.

  16. Donnermeyer D, Bürklein S, DammaschkeT, Schäfer E. Endodontic sealers based oncalcium silicates: a systematic review. Odontol.2019;107(4):421–36.

  17. Lim M, Jung C, Shin D-H, Cho Y, Song M.Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: aliterature review. Restor Dent Endod.2020;45(3):e35.

  18. Barbosa VM, Pitondo-Silva A, Oliveira-SilvaM, Martorano AS, Rizzi-Maia C de C, Silva-Sousa YTC, et al. Antibacterial Activity of aNew Ready-To-Use Calcium Silicate-BasedSealer. Braz Dent J. 2020;31(6):611–6.

  19. Bose R, Ioannidis K, Foschi F, Bakhsh A,Kelly RD, Deb S, et al. Antimicrobial Effectivenessof Calcium Silicate Sealers againsta Nutrient-Stressed Multispecies Biofilm. JClin Med. 2020;9(9):2722.

  20. Azar NG, Heidari M, Bahrami ZS, Shokri F.In vitro cytotoxicity of a new epoxy resin rootcanal sealer. J Endod. agosto de2000;26(8):462–5.

  21. Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B. Ex vivo cytotoxicityof a new calcium silicate-based canal fillingmaterial. Int Endod J. 2010;43(9):769–74.

  22. Raghavendra SS, Jadhav GR, Gathani KM,Kotadia P. Bioceramics in endodontics – areview. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017;51(3Suppl 1):S128–37.

  23. Šimundić Munitić M, Budimir A, JakovljevićS, Anić I, Bago I. Short-Term AntibacterialEfficacy of Three Bioceramic Root CanalSealers Against Enterococcus Faecalis Biofilms.Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020;54(1):3–9.

  24. Huang Y, Li X, Mandal P, Wu Y, Liu L, GuiH, et al. The in vitro antimicrobial activities offour endodontic sealers. BMC Oral Health.2019;19.

  25. Du T, Wang Z, Shen Y, Ma J, Cao Y,Haapasalo M. Combined Antibacterial Effectof Sodium Hypochlorite and Root CanalSealers against Enterococcus faecalis Biofilmsin Dentin Canals. J Endod.2015;41(8):1294–8.

  26. Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Dentin extendsthe antibacterial effect of endodonticsealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms.J Endod. 2014;40(4):505–8.

  27. Bukhari S, Karabucak B. The AntimicrobialEffect of Bioceramic Sealer on an 8-weekMatured Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Attachedto Root Canal Dentinal Surface. J Endod.2019;45(8):1047–52.

  28. AlShwaimi E, Bogari D, Ajaj R, Al-ShahraniS, Almas K, Majeed A. In Vitro AntimicrobialEffectiveness of Root Canal Sealers againstEnterococcus faecalis: A Systematic Review.J Endod. 2016;42(11):1588–97.

  29. Alsubait S, Albader S, Alajlan N, AlkhunainiN, Niazy A, Almahdy A. Comparison of theantibacterial activity of calcium silicate- andepoxy resin-based endodontic sealersagainst Enterococcus faecalis biofilms: aconfocal laser-scanning microscopy analysis.Odontol. 2019;107(4):513–20.

  30. Poggio C, Trovati F, Ceci M, Colombo M,Pietrocola G. Antibacterial activity of differentroot canal sealers against Enterococcusfaecalis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(6):e743–8.

  31. Šimundić Munitić M, Poklepović Peričić T,Utrobičić A, Bago I, Puljak L. Antimicrobialefficacy of commercially available endodonticbioceramic root canal sealers: A systematicreview. PloS One.2019;14(10):e0223575.

  32. Prestegaard H, Portenier I, Řrstavik D,Kayaoglu G, Haapasalo M, Endal U. Antibacterialactivity of various root canal sealersand root-end filling materials in dentin blocksinfected ex vivo with Enterococcus faecalis.Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72(8):970–6.

  33. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M.Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardizedsingle disk method. Am J ClinPathol. 1966;45(4):493–6.

  34. García-Rodríguez JA, Cantón R, García-Sánchez JE, Gomez-Lus ML, Martínez MartínezL, Rodríguez-Avial C, et al. Procedimientosen Microbiología Clínica. Métodosbásicos para el estudio de la sensibilidad alos antimicrobianos. [Internet]. Picazo JJ,editor. 2000. Disponible en:https://www.seimc.org/contenidos/documentoscientificos/procedimientosmicrobiologia/seimc-procedimientomicrobiologia11.pdf

  35. Cona E. Condiciones para un buen estudiode susceptibilidad mediante test de difusiónen agar. Rev Chil Infectol [Internet]. 2002[citado el 27 de marzo de 2022];19. Disponibleen: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-10182002019200001&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en

  36. Heredia-Veloz D, Abad-Coronel D, Villavicencio-Caparó E. Eficacia antibacteriana detres selladores endodónticos frente al Enterococcusfaecalis. Rev Estomatol Hered.2017;27(3):132.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com