medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Print)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2023, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2023; 25 (1)

Biomechanical and Chemical Behavior of Various Bioactive Materials in Class II Restorations

Ramírez BJC, Quesada RFJ

Language: English
References: 36
Page: 44-57
PDF size: 615.11 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the biomechanical and chemical behavior of various bioactive materials in class II MOD restorations. Forty-eight standardized class II MOD cavities were prepared in sound extracted human molar teeth. The specimens were divided into four groups according to the restorative material: Group 1 (Filtek™ Z350 XT), Group 2 (Biodentine™ as a liner, and then restored with Filtek™ Z350 XT), Group 3 (Cention N™), and Group 4 (Activa™ Bioactive-Restorative). The samples were tested for fracture resistance by subjecting them to a compressive load in a Universal testing Machine. The failure modes of each specimen were evaluated. The alkalinizing potential and calcium ion release of the materials were measured. SEM-EDAX analyses were also performed for all materials. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test (p‹0.05). Group 1 showed the higher fracture resistance (p‹0.05). Group 3 had greater fracture resistance values but no statistical difference from Group 4. Biodentine™ showed greater biomineralization potential. Class II MOD restorations of Group 1 displayed the higher fracture resistance; however, it was highly associated with catastrophic failure. Conversely, Biodentine™ presented a more significant bioactivity potential, and its use, as in Group 2, promoted the most favorable failure mode.


REFERENCES

  1. Silva P.F.D., Oliveira L.R.S., Braga S.S.L., Signori C., Armstrong S.R., Soares C.J., et al. Effect of selective carious tissue removal on biomechanical behavior of class II bulk-fill dental composite restorations. Dental Materials. 2018 Sep 1; 34 (9): 1289-98.

  2. Heintze S.D., Monreal D., Peschke A. Marginal Quality of Class II Composite Restorations Placed in Bulk Compared to an Incremental Technique: Evaluation with SEM andStereomicroscope. J Adhes Dent. 2015; 17 (2): 147-54.

  3. Ástvaldsdóttir Á., Dagerhamn J., van Dijken J.W.v, Naimi-Akbar A., Sandborgh-Englund G., Tranæus S., et al. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in adults-A systematic review. J Dent. 2015 Aug; 43 (8): 934-54.

  4. van Dijken J.W.V., Pallesen U., Benetti A. A randomized controlled evaluation of posterior resin restorations of an altered resin modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed bioactivity. Dental Materials. 2019 Feb 1; 35 (2): 335-43.

  5. Retana-Lobo DDS M.C., Reyes-Carmona DDS MP J. Ex Vivo Evaluation of a Restoration Protocol for Teeth with Simulated Incomplete Rhizogenesis. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2019 Nov 11; 293-307.

  6. Reyes-Carmona DDS MP J., Santos PhD A., Cordeiro DDS P.M. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Calcium Hydroxide Promotes In Vivo Intratubular Mineralization. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2016 Mar 17; 18 (1): 49.

  7. Reyes-Carmona J.F., Felippe M.S., Felippe W.T. Biomineralization ability and interaction of mineral trioxide aggregate and white portland cement with dentin in a phosphate-containing fluid. J Endod. 2009 May; 35 (5): 731-6.

  8. Ebaya M.M., Ali A.I., Mahmoud S.H. Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Three Glass Ionomer-Based Class v Restorations: In Vitro Study. European Journal of Dentistry. 2019; 13 (4): 599-606.

  9. Persson A., Claesson R., van Dijken J.W.v. Levels of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in plaque on aged restorations of an ion-releasing and a universal hybrid composite resin. Acta Odontol Scand. 2005 Feb; 63 (1): 21-5.

  10. Retana-Lobo C., Tanomaru-Filho M., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M., Benavides-García M., Hernández-Meza E., Reyes-Carmona J. Push-Out Bond Strength, Characterization, and Ion Release of Premixed and Powder-Liquid Bioceramic Sealers with or without Gutta-Percha. Scanning. 2021 May 6; 2021: 1-12.

  11. Retana-Lobo C., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M., Tanomaru-Filho M., Mendes de Souza B.D., Reyes-Carmona J. Non-Collagenous Dentin Protein Binding Sites Control Mineral Formation during the Biomineralisation Process in Radicular Dentin. Materials (Basel). 2020 Feb 27; 13 (5).

  12. Malkondu Ö., Karapinar Kazandağ M., Kazazoğlu E. A review on biodentine, a contemporary dentine replacement and repair material. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 160951.

  13. Bansal R., Burgess J., Lawson N.C. Wear of an enhanced resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Am J Dent. 2016 Jun; 29 (3): 171-4.

  14. Kumari A., Singh N. A comparative evaluation of microleakage and dentin shear bond strength of three restorative materials. Biomater Investig Dent. 2022; 9 (1): 1-9.

  15. Singla T., Pandit I.K., Srivastava N., Gugnani N., Gupta M. An evaluation of microleakage of various glass ionomer based restorative materials in deciduous and permanent teeth: An in vitro study. Saudi Dent J. 2012 Jan; 24 (1): 35-42.

  16. Bonilla E.D., Hayashi M., Pameijer C.H., Le N.v., Morrow B.R., Garcia-Godoy F. The effect of two composite placement techniques on fracture resistance of MOD restorations with various resin composites. Journal of Dentistry. 2020 Oct 1;101:103348.

  17. Al-Nahedh H.N. Effects of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Bulk-Fill Base on the Fracture Resistance of Class II Restorations: An Original LaboratoryExperimental Study. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2021 Apr 1; 22 (4): 342-8.

  18. Silva E.J.N.L., Canabarro A., Andrade M.R.T.C., Cavalcante D.M., von Stetten O., Fidalgo T.K. da S., et al. Dislodgment Resistance of Bioceramic and Epoxy Sealers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019; 19 (3): 221-35.

  19. Demarco F.F., Corrêa M.B., Cenci M.S., Moraes R.R., Opdam N.J.M. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater. 2012 Jan; 28 (1): 87-101.

  20. Sujith R., Yadav T.G., Pitalia D., Babaji P., Apoorva K., Sharma A. Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jun 1; 21 (6): 691-5.

  21. Al-Nahedh H.N. Effects of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement and Flowable Bulk-Fill Base on the Fracture Resistance of Class II Restorations: An Original Laboratory Experimental Study. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2021 Apr 1; 22 (4): 342-8.

  22. Lins R.B.E., Aristilde S., Osório J.H., Cordeiro C.M.B., Yanikian C.R.F., Bicalho A.A., et al. Biomechanical behaviour of bulk-fill resin composites in class II restorations. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2019 Oct 1; 98: 255-61.

  23. Nothdurft F.P., Seidel E., Gebhart F., Naumann M., Motter P.J., Pospiech P.R. Influence of endodontic posts on the fracture behavior of crowned premolars with class II cavities. Journal of Dentistry. 2008; 36 (4): 287-93.

  24. Ebru Kucukyilmaz et al. Effects of pulp capping materials on fracture resistance of Class II composite restorations. Eur J Dent 2015; 09 (02): 218-223.

  25. Retana-Lobo C., Tanomaru-Filho M., Guerreiro-Tanomaru J.M., Benavides-García M., Hernández-Meza E., Reyes-Carmona J. Push-Out Bond Strength, Characterization, and Ion Release of Premixed and Powder-Liquid Bioceramic Sealers with or without Gutta-Percha. Scanning. 2021 May 6; 2021: 1-12.

  26. Reyes-Carmona J.F., Felippe M.S., Felippe W.T. The biomineralization ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement on dentin enhances the push-out strength. J Endod. 2010 Feb; 36 (2): 286-91.

  27. Torabinejad M., Watson T.F., Pitt Ford T.R. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a root end filling material. J Endod. 1993 Dec; 19 (12): 591-5.

  28. Prüllage R.K., Urban K., Schäfer E., Dammaschke T. Material Properties of a Tricalcium Silicate-containing, a Mineral Trioxide Aggregate-containing, and an Epoxy Resin-based Root Canal Sealer. J Endod. 2016 Dec; 42 (12): 1784-8.

  29. Rajaraman G., Senthil Eagappan A.R., Bhavani S., Vijayaraghavan R., Harishma S., Jeyapreetha P. Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Fiber-Reinforced Composite and Alkasite Restoration in Class I Cavity. Contemp Clin Dent. 13 (1): 56-60.

  30. Rosatto C.M.P., Bicalho A.A., Veríssimo C., Bragança G.F., Rodrigues M.P., Tantbirojn D., et al. Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique. J Dent. 2015 Dec; 43 (12): 1519-28.

  31. Naz F., Samad Khan A., Kader M.A., al Gelban LO.S., Mousa N.M.A., Asiri R.S.H., et al. Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials. Saudi Dent J. 2021 Nov; 33 (7): 666-73.

  32. Balagopal S., Nekkanti S., Kaur K. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties and Fluoride-releasing Ability of a New Self-cure Filling Material. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Feb 1; 22 (2): 134-9.

  33. Younis S., Alaa E. Flexural Strength and Modulus of Elasticity of Two Base Materials. An In vitro Comparative study. Egyptian Dental Journal. 2020 Jul 1; 66 (3): 1837-43.

  34. Garoushi S., Vallittu P.K., Lassila L. Characterization of fluoride releasing restorative dental materials. Dent Mater J. 2018 Mar 30; 37 (2): 293-300.

  35. Choudhury W.R., Nekkanti S. Mechanical Properties of SDRTM and BiodentineTM as Dentin Replacement Materials: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022 Jan 1; 23 (1): 43-8.

  36. Asmussen E., Peutzfeldt A. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading. Dent Mater. 2008 May; 24 (5): 600-5.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com