medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Print)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2023, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2023; 25 (1)

Bond Strength Comparison Among 10-MDP-Containing and Non-10-MDP-Containing Adhesives in Different Degrees of Dental Fluorosis

Solís-Martínez LJ, Valles FKY, Vargas Chávez N, Almeda-Ojeda OE, Barajas-Pérez VH, García-Torres E

Language: English
References: 42
Page: 33-43
PDF size: 145.28 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Dental fluorosis can cause changes in the enamel surface, conditioning its functionality and esthetics. The application of dental adhesives is a treatment option; however, their use on fluorotic teeth can result in limitations. The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of two different adhesives, one with 10-MDP and one without 10-MDP, in different degrees of dental fluorosis.This is an in vitro study on dental enamel samples, a total of 180 samples with the inclusion criteria were treated, randomly divided into two groups of 90, according to the type of dental adhesive, where each group was again divided into three groups of 30 samples, representing different degrees of dental fluorosis according to the Thylstrup-Fejerskov index (Group I: TF1 and TF2; Group II: TF3; Group III: TF4). Normality tests, two-factor ANOVA, and post-hoc tests were used to determine differences between the groups, with a significance level of 95%. As results, a statistically significant difference was shown between the use of dental adhesive with 10-MDP and the three groups of dental fluorosis (p=0.011), in addition, a Tukey post-hoc test on the groups treated with 10-MDP adhesive revealed a statistically significant difference between group I versus group II, and group I versus group III, (p=‹0.05). It is concluded that the use of adhesive systems with 10-MDP presents a better shear bond strength on enamel with dental fluorosis grades I and II in the Thylstrup-Fejerskov index.


REFERENCES

  1. Zhang J., Sardana D., Li K.Y., Leung K.C.M., Lo E.C.M. Topical Fluoride to Prevent Root Caries: Systematic Review with Network Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2020; 99 (5): 506-513. doi:10.1177/0022034520906384

  2. Iheozor-Ejiofor Z., Worthington H.V., Walsh T., O'Malley L., Clarkson J.E., Macey R., Alam R., Tugwell P., Welch V., Glenny A.M. Water fluoridation for the prevention of dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 (6): CD010856. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010856.pub2

  3. O'Mullane D.M., Baez R.J., Jones S., Lennon M.A., Petersen P.E., Rugg-Gunn A.J., Whelton H., Whitford G.M. Fluoride and Oral Health. Community Dent Health. 2016; 33 (2): 69-99.

  4. World Health Organization. Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating first addendum, 4th ed + 1st add. World Health Organization. 2017. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/254637.

  5. Do L.G., Ha D.H. Dental Fluorosis: Epidemiological Aspects. En: Peres M.A., Antunes J.L.F., Watt R.G. (eds) Oral Epidemiology. Textbooks in Contemporary Dentistry. Springer, Cham. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50123-5_7

  6. Kimambo V., Bhattacharya P., Mtalo F., Mtamba J., Ahmad A. Fluoride occurrence in groundwater systems at global scale and status of defluoridation-state of the art. Groundwater for Sustainable Development. 2019; (9): 100223.

  7. Aguilar-Díaz F.D.C., Morales-Corona F., Cintra-Viveiro A.C., Fuente-Hernández J. Prevalence of dental fluorosis in Mexico 2005-2015: a literature review. Salud Publica Mex. 2017; 59 (3): 306-313. doi:10.21149/7764

  8. Molina Frechero N., Sánchez Pérez L., Castañeda Castaneira E., et al. Drinking water fluoride levels for a city in northern Mexico (durango) determined using a direct electrochemical method and their potential effects on oral health. ScientificWorldJournal.2013; 2013:186392. doi:10.1155/2013/186392

  9. Shahroom N.S.B., Mani G., Ramakrishnan M. Interventions in management of dental fluorosis, an endemic disease: A systematic review. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019; 8 (10): 3108-3113. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_648_19. PMID: 31742127; PMCID: PMC6857403.

  10. Cavalheiro J.P., Girotto Bussaneli D., Restrepo M., Bullio Fragelli C.M., Loiola Cordeiro R.D.C., Escobar Rojas A., Jeremias F. Clinical aspects of dental fluorosis according to histological features: a Thylstrup Fejerskov Index review. CES Odontología. 2017; 30 (1), 41-50. doi:10.21615/cesodon.30.1.4

  11. Huilcapi M., Armas-Vega A., Cardenas A.F.M., et al. Effect of surface treatments on the adhesive properties of metallic brackets on fluorotic enamel. Dental Press J Orthod. 2020; 25 (4): 59-67. doi:10.1590/2177-6709.25.4.059-067.oar

  12. Roque-Márquez J.G., Zavala-Alonso N.V., Patiño-Marín N., Martínez-Castañón G.A. Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite in Ground Fluorotic Enamel: Shear Bond Strength and Surface Analysis. Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2021: 320-332.

  13. Gu M., Lv L., He X., Li W., Guo L. Effect of phosphoric acid concentration used for etching on the microtensile bond strength to fluorotic teeth. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97 (35): e12093. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000012093

  14. Sebold M., André C.B., Sahadi B.O., Breschi L., Giannini M. Chronological history andcurrent advancements of dental adhesive systems development: a narrative review. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2020; 35 (18), 1941-1967. DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2020.1865611

  15. Van Meerbeek B., Yoshihara K., Van Landuyt K., Yoshida Y., Peumans M. From Buonocore's Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology. J Adhes Dent. 2020; 22 (1): 7-34. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a43994

  16. Sofan E., Sofan A., Palaia G., Tenore G., Romeo U., Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017; 8 (1): 1-17. Published 2017 Jul 3. doi:10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001

  17. Tsuchiya K., Takamizawa T., Barkmeier W.W., Tsubota K., Tsujimoto A., Berry T.P., Erickson R.L., Latta M.A., Miyazaki M. Effect of a functional monomer (MDP) on the enamel bond durability of single-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016; 124 (1): 96-102. doi:10.1111/eos.12232.

  18. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical. Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2009. URL https://www.R-project.org/.

  19. Al-Sugair M.H., Akpata E.S. Effect of fluorosis on etching of human enamel. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26 (6):521-528. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00391.x

  20. Ateyah N., Akpata E. Factors affecting shear bond strength of composite resin to fluorosed human enamel. Oper Dent. 2000; 25 (3): 216-222.

  21. Ekambaram, M., & Yiu, C. K. Y. Bonding to hypomineralized enamel-A systematic review. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2016 (69): 27-32.

  22. Gaur A., Maheshwari S., Verma S.K., Tariq M. Efectos del promotor de adhesión en la unión de ortodoncia en dientes fluorados: un estudio de microscopía electrónica de barrido. J Ortodoncia Sci . 2016; 5 (3): 87-91. doi:10.4103/2278-0203.186165

  23. Perdigão J. Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) Dentin adhesion - not there yet. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020 Nov; 56 (1):190-207. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Sep 23. PMID: 34188727; PMCID: PMC8216299.

  24. Lopes G.C., Thys D.G., Klaus P., Oliveira G.M., Widmer N. Enamel acid etching: a review. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2007 Jan; 28 (1): 18-24; quiz 25, 42. PMID: 17278628.

  25. Carrilho E., Cardoso M., Marques Ferreira M., Marto C.M., Paula A., Coelho A.S. 10-MDP Based Dental Adhesives: Adhesive Interface Characterization and Adhesive Stability-A Systematic Review. Materials (Basel). 2019 Mar 7; 12 (5): 790. doi: 10.3390/ma12050790. PMID: 30866488; PMCID: PMC6427605.

  26. Sachdeva, B., Dua, P., Mangla, R., Kaur, H., Rana, S., & Butail, A. Bonding efficacy of 5 th, 6 th, 7 th & 8 th generation bonding agents on primary teeth. Int J Dent Med Sci. 2018 (17): 61-6.

  27. Torres-Gallegos I., A. Martinez-Castañon G., Loyola-Rodriguez J.P., Patiño-Marin N., Encinas A., Ruiz F., Anusavice K. Effectiveness of bonding resin-based composite to healthy and fluorotic enamel using total-etch and two self-etch adhesive systems. Dent Mater J. 2012; 31 (6): 1021-7. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2012-140. PMID: 23207210.

  28. Ertugrul F., Turkun M., Turkun L.f., Toman M., Cal E. Bond strenght of different dentin bonding systems to fluorotic enamel. The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2009; 11: p. 1-5.

  29. Turp V., Sen D., Tuncelli B., Ozcan M. Adhesion of 10-MDP containing resin cements to dentin with and without the etch-and-rinse technique. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5 (3): 226-233. doi:10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.226

  30. Weerasinghe, D. S., Nikaido, T., Wettasinghe, K. A., Abayakoon, J. B., & Tagami, J. (2005). Micro-shear bond strength and morphological analysis of a self-etching primer adhesive system to fluorosed enamel. Journal of Dentistry. 2005; 33 (5), 419-426.

  31. Cardenas, A. F. M., Armas-Veja, A., Rodriguez Villarreal, J. P., SIQUEIRA, F. S. F. D., Muniz, L. P., Campos, V. S., & Loguercio, A. D. Influence of the mode of application of universal adhesive systems on adhesive properties to fluorotic enamel. Brazilian Oral Research. 2019; (33).

  32. Mendes, M., Portugal, J., Arantes-Oliveira, S., & Mesquita, P. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial. 2014; 55 (2), 73-77.

  33. Wiegand A., Lechte C., Kanzow P. Adhesion to eroded enamel and dentin: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2021; 37 (12): 1845-1853.doi:10.1016/j.dental.2021.09.014

  34. Silva-Benítez, E. L., Zavala-Alonso, V., Martinez-Castanon, G. A., Loyola-Rodriguez, J. P., Patiño-Marin, N., Ortega-Pedrajo, I., & García-Godoy, F. Shear bond strength evaluation of bonded molar tubes on fluorotic molars. The Angle Orthodontist. 2013; 83 (1), 152-157.

  35. Ihsan, S. S. A., & Mohammed, S. A. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic buccal tube bonded to zirconia crown after using two different (10-MDP)-containing adhesive systems. International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences. 2019; 8 (2), 69-78.

  36. Waidyasekera, P. G. K., Nikaido, T., Weerasinghe, D. D. S., & Tagami, J. (2007). Bonding of acid-etch and self-etch adhesives to human fluorosed dentine. Journal of dentistry, 35(12), 915-922.

  37. Banu Ermiş, R., & Gokay, N. (2003). Effect of fluorosis on dentine shear bond strength of a self-etching bonding system. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 30(11), 1090-1094.

  38. Liu, S., Zhu, Y., & Gegen, T. (2020). Micromorphological analysis and bond strength comparison of two adhesives for different degrees of dental fluorosis. Applied Adhesion Science, 8 (1), 1-13.

  39. Fehrenbach, J., Isolan, C. P., & Münchow, E. A. (2021). Is the presence of 10-MDP associated to higher bonding performance for self-etching adhesive systems? A meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Dental Materials, 37 (10), 1463-1485.

  40. Shibuya, K., Ohara, N., Ono, S., Matsuzaki, K., & Yoshiyama, M. (2019). Influence of 10-MDP concentration on the adhesion and physical properties of self-adhesive resin cements. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 44 (4).

  41. Sun, Z., You, X., Xu, J., Chen, L., Li, S., Zhang, Z., & Guo, L. Effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite treatment on the bonding of four adhesive systems to fluorotic enamel. Dental Materials Journal. 2022; 2021-305.

  42. Sato, T., Takagaki, T., Hatayama, T., Nikaido, T., & Tagami, J. Update on enamel bonding strategies. Frontiers in Dental Medicine. 2021; 34.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com