medigraphic.com
ISSN 2796-9711 (Print)
Publicación de la Asociación Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología

2022, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

salud ciencia tec 2022; 2 (1)

Ethical aspects in the publication of scientific manuscripts: A literature review

Canova BCJ

Language: Spanish
References: 46
Page:
PDF size: 458.43 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Scientific publication is the pillar for the dissemination of knowledge, and in the case of health professions, its objective is to report experiences that allow improving the quality of care provided to patients. However, in recent decades there has been an increase in unethical behaviors linked to the production and publication of scientific manuscripts, which makes it essential to make researchers in training, new and experienced, aware of what these behaviors are and make some suggestions to prevent them. Based on the above, this article carries out a narrative literature review with the aim of grouping in a single document, the core ethical aspects in the dissemination of knowledge through the publication of scientific articles.


REFERENCES

  1. Doody O, Noonan M. Nursing research ethics, guidance and application in practice. Br J Nurs. 2016;25(14):803–807.

  2. Aliukonis V, Poškutė M, Gefenas E. Perish or Publish Dilemma: Challenges to Responsible Authorship. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(3):123.

  3. Álvarez L. Ética en la investigación en salud: un aspecto de calidad humana y profesional. Duazary. 2012;9(1).

  4. Rothman DJ. Were Tuskegee & Willowbrook ‘studies in nature’? Hastings Cent Rep. 1982;12(2):5-7.

  5. Sekhar A, Kang G. Human challenge trials in vaccine development. Semin Immunol. 2020;50:101429.

  6. Guirao Goris S. Utilidad y tipos de revisión de literatura. Ene. 2015;9(2).

  7. Rodríguez-Venegas EdlC, Zamora Fung R. Autoría y dilemas éticos en la publicación científica. Rev Cubana Med. 2021;60(1):e1604.

  8. Siegel MG, Brand JC, Rossi MJ, Lubowitz JH. “Publish or Perish” Promotes Medical Literature Quantity Over Quality. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(11):2941-2942.

  9. Eftekhari RB, Maghsoudnia N, Dorkoosh FA. Publish or Perish: An Academic Status Anxiety. Pharm Nanotechnol. 2021;9(4):248-250.

  10. D’Antonio P. Publish or Perish-and Your Peril. Nurs Hist Rev. 2019;27(1):12-14.

  11. Springer. Tutoriales de autores y revisores: Ética de la publicación. https://www.springer.com/la/authors-editors/tutoriales-de-autores-y-revisores/submitting-to-a-journal-and-peer-review/publication-ethics/12022858

  12. Alfonso F, Bermejo J, Segovia J. Publicación duplicada o redundante: ¿podemos permitírnoslo? Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005;58(5):601-604.

  13. Arumugam A, Aldhafiri FK. A researcher’s ethical dilemma: Is self-plagiarism a condemnable practice or not? Physiother Theory Pract. 2016;32(6):427-429.

  14. Bruton S. Self-Plagiarism and Textual Recycling: Legitimate Forms of Research Misconduct. Accountability in Research. 2014;21(3):176-197.

  15. Gündüz T. Generating Multiple Publications from One Research Study in Academic Writing: An Ethical Problem (?). Uludağ Univ İlahiyat Fak Derg. 2020;29(1):45–80.

  16. Altay S, Koçak Z. Multiple Publications From the Same Dataset: Is It Acceptable? Balkan Med J. 2021;38(5):263-264.

  17. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Overlapping Publications. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/overlapping-publications.html.

  18. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. Disponible en: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html.

  19. Lam Díaz RM. Mala conducta científica en la publicación. Rev Cubana Hematol Inmunol Hemoter. 2018;34(1):96-101.

  20. Pupovac V, Prijić-Samaržija S, Petrovečki M. Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct. Sci Eng Ethics. 2017;23(1):165-181.

  21. Godecharle S, Fieuws S, Nemery B, Dierickx K. Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24(6):1697-1717.

  22. Díaz GM. El fraude en las publicaciones científicas: más allá de fabricar, falsificar y plagiar. Tecno lógicas. 2016;19(36):9-12.

  23. Nurunnabi M, Hossain MA. Data falsification and question on academic integrity. Account Res. 2019;26(2):108-122.

  24. Davenas E, Beauvais F, Amara J, Oberbaum M, Robinzon B, Miadonna A, Tedeschi A, Pomeranz B, Fortner P, Belon P, Sainte-Laudy J, Poitevin B, Benveniste J. Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE. Nature. 1988; 333(6176): 816-818.

  25. Poitevin B. La “Memoria del Agua” y su Origen Homeopático. La Homeopatía de México. 2019;88(716):5-27.

  26. Chambers LM, Michener CM, Falcone T. Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG. 2019;126:1134–40.

  27. Gasparyan AY, Nurmashev B, Seksenbayev B, Trukhachev VI, Kostyukova EI, Kitas GD. Plagiarism in the Context of Education and Evolving Detection Strategies. J Korean Med Sci. 2017;32(8):1220-1227.

  28. La República. Universidad César Vallejo tras denuncia de plagio de tesis: “Los responsables serán sancionados”. [Acceso 21 de Septiembre de 2022]. https://larepublica.pe/sociedad/2022/09/04/universidad-cesar-vallejo-tras-denuncia-de-plagio-de-tesis-los-responsables-seran-sancionados-ucv/.

  29. de Almeida RM, Catelani F, Fontes-Pereira AJ, Gave Nde S. Retractions in general and internal medicine in a high-profile scientific indexing database. Sao Paulo Med J. 2016;134:74–78.

  30. Helgesson G, Eriksson S. Plagiarism in research. Med Health Care Philos. 2015;18(1):91-101.

  31. Matías-Guiu J, García-Ramos R. Autores-fantasma, mejora en la comunicación de artículos y publicaciones médicas. Nerología. 2011;26(5):257-261.

  32. Ruipérez G, García-Cabrero JC. Plagio e integridad académica en Alemania. Comunicar. 2016;14(48):9-17.

  33. Vidal S. Comités de ética de la investigación. Ministerio de Salud. https://salud.gob.ar/dels/entradas/comites-de-etica-de-la-investigacion.

  34. Hospital Universitario de Getafe. ¿Qué estudios deben contar con la aprobación de un CEI/CEIM para ser realizados? https://www.comunidad.madrid/hospital/getafe/node/428#:~:text=Los%20estudios%20observacionales%20sin%20medicamentos,de%20la%20investigaci%C3%B3n%20lo%20aconsejan.

  35. Panda S. Predatory journals. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2020;86(2):109-114.

  36. Cortegiani A, Manca A, Giarratano A. Predatory journals and conferences: why fake counts. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Apr;33(2):192-197.

  37. Elmore SA, Weston EH. Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them. Toxicol Pathol. 2020;48(4):607-610.

  38. Watson R. Predatory journals and the pollution of academic publishing. J Nurs Manag. 2019;27:223-224.

  39. Repiso R. La cita como indicador de calidad. Revista Comunicar. https://doi.org/10.3916/escuela-de-autores-129.

  40. Imperial College of London. Self-citations. Disponible en: https://www.imperial.ac.uk/research-and-innovation/support-for-staff/scholarly-communication/bibliometrics/citation-metrics/self-citations/#:~:text=Self%2Dcitation%20occurs%20in%20an,inflate%20an%20individual’s%20citation%20count.

  41. Van Noorden R, Singh Chawla D. Policing self-citation. Nature. 2019;572:578-579.

  42. King MM, Bergstrom CT, Correll SJ, Jacquet, J, & West JD. Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time. Socius. 2017;3.

  43. Marques F. La sombra de la autopromoción. Revista Pesquisa. 2019. https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/es/la-sombra-de-la-autopromocion/.

  44. Meza P, Ortega G. La autocita en artículos de investigación publicados en Scielo Chile: variación según el área de la ciencia y la experticia del autor. Investig Bibl. 2019;33(81):41-56.

  45. Ioannidis JPA, Baas J, Klavans R, Boyack KW. A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(8):e3000384.

  46. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). COPE Discussion documents: Citation Manipulation. 2019. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.3.1.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com