Garay PRA, Parra RA

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page:
PDF size: 190.78 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: contemporary society is characterized by being structured by social, economic, labor and academic dynamics that make greater demands on nurses every day.
Aim: to characterize the extra-occupational psychosocial risk factors affecting nursing personnel.
Methods: a descriptive, non-experimental, cross-sectional, quantitative research was carried out. The sample consisted of 150 health professionals. To measure the variables to be studied in this research, the Battery of instruments for the evaluation of psychosocial risk validated by the Ministry of Social Protection of the Republic of Colombia was used. Descriptive statistics were used.
Results: regarding family relationships, it was observed that 47,4 % of the respondents were not at risk in this dimension. Regarding the dimension of communication and interpersonal relationships, 20,1 % of the respondents were found to be at very high risk. Regarding the characteristics of the dwelling and its environment, 59,7 % were found to be at very high risk. When analyzing the influence of the extra-work environment on work it was observed that 28,6 % are at very high risk.
Conclusions: nursing personnel are exposed to extra-work psychosocial risk factors, so actions should be aimed at both promotion and prevention, as well as intervention of these factors so that they do not interfere in the future with the work environment or be the beginning of deterioration and physical as well as mental wear and tear in nursing personnel.

REFERENCES

1. Cañadas-De la Fuente G, Ortega E, Ramirez-Baena L, De la Fuente-Solana E, Vargas C, Gómez-Urquiza J. Gender, Marital Status, and Children as Risk Factors for Burnout in Nurses: A Meta-Analytic Study. IJERPH 2018;15:2102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15102102

2. Molero Jurado M, Pérez-Fuentes M, Gázquez Linares J, Simón Márquez M, Martos Martínez Á. Burnout Risk and Protection Factors in Certified Nursing Aides. IJERPH 2018;15:1116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061116

3. Peters E. Compassion fatigue in nursing: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum 2018;53:466-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12274

4. Ministerio de la Protección Social, MPS. (2010). Batería de Instrumentos para la Evaluación de Factores de Riesgo Psicosocial, Resolución 2646 de 2008. https://www.protegerips.com/images/bateria-riesgo-psicosocial-1.pdf

5. Maharaj S, Lees T, Lal S. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in a Cohort of Australian Nurses. IJERPH 2018;16:61. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010061

6. Miranda Román G. El tiempo libre y ocio reivindicado por los trabajadores. PASOS 2006;4:301-26. https://doi.org/10.25145/j.pasos.2006.04.021

7. Phillips J, Richard A, Mayer KM, Shilkaitis M, Fogg LF, Vondracek H. Integrating the Social Determinants of Health into Nursing Practice: Nurses’ Perspectives. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2020;52:497-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12584

8. Edwards JR, Rothbard NP. Mechanisms Linking Work and Family: Clarifying the Relationship between Work and Family Constructs. The Academy of Management Review 2000;25:178. https://doi.org/10.2307/259269

9. Sok SR, Seong MH, Ryu MH. Differences of Self-Control, Daily Life Stress, and Communication Skills between Smartphone Addiction Risk Group and General Group in Korean Nursing Students. Psychiatr Q 2019;90:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-018-9596-1

10. Gómez Restrepo C, Rodríguez Malagón N. Factores de riesgo asociados al síndrome depresivo en la población colombiana. Rev Colomb Psiquiatr 1997:23-35.

11. Louro Bernal I. La familia en la determinación de la salud. Revista Cubana de Salud Pública 2003;29:48-51.

12. Molina-Praena J, Ramirez-Baena L, Gómez-Urquiza J, Cañadas G, De la Fuente E, Cañadas-De la Fuente G. Levels of Burnout and Risk Factors in Medical Area Nurses: A Meta-Analytic Study. IJERPH 2018;15:2800. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122800

13. Londoño NH, Marín CA, Juárez F, Palacio J, Muñiz O, Escobar B, et al. Factores de riesgo psicosociales y ambientales asociados a trastornos mentales. Suma Psicológica 2010;17:59-68.

14. Wood J, Oh J, Park J, Kim W. The Relationship Between Work Engagement and Work–Life Balance in Organizations: A Review of the Empirical Research. Human Resource Development Review 2020;19:240-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320917560

15. Gutiérrez Puebla J, García Palomares J C. Cambios en la movilidad en el área metropolitana de Madrid: el creciente uso del transporte privado. Anales de Geografia de la Universidad Complutense 2006:331-52.