Roque-Torres G, Kim J, Dantas CE, Oyoyo U

Language: English
References: 27
Page: 139-151
PDF size: 174.55 Kb.

ABSTRACT

A 3-dimensional (3D) printed custom-frame can improve the peripheral seal of readily available surgical/medical masks. This study aimed to assess the acceptance of a 3D-printed custom-frame with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) surgical/medical masks and the use of a face shield. A total of 206 subjects from a dental school participated, who answered a multiple-choice questionnaire. Participants received an invitation through the institutional email of the school via Qualtrics platform. 3D printed custom-frames were fabricated for each participant. According to their response, participants were divided into 4 groups: mask only (M), mask and frame (MF), mask and face shield (MFS), and all 3 personal protective equipment (MFFS). Data was analyzed in absolute and relative frequency. The acceptance of a 3D-printed custom-frame in the group MFFS varied between “poor”/’’very poor” (44.7%). It allowed “good” performance of routine procedures (40.3%), but “poor” visual quality (48.1%). Musculoskeletal tolerance and ease to perform movements were adequate. There was no interference in olfactory sensitivity (44.7%) or in the ability to breathe (34.5%). Finally, it showed "moderate pain" (48.1%) on the ear and "no pain" (38.9%) on the head. The 3D-printed custom-frame adapted to ASTM surgical/medical face masks showed reasonable tolerance. Side effects of ear pain ranging in degrees were noted. Further research is indicated to evaluate safety, comfort, compliance, side effects, and occupational hazards of long-term use of enhanced PPE recommendations.Avoiding the recurrent outbreaks of COVID-19, the use of PPE by the public is necessary. Improper PPE use is a major source of concern for human and environmental health. Preventing such activities can be done by following steps involved in PPE disposals or by getting a new way to re-use such as improving peripherical sealing. Our work highlights that a custom-frame can improve protection, without adverse effects.

REFERENCES

1. Ballard D.H., Jammalamadaka U., Meacham K.W., Hoegger M.J., Burke B.A., Morris J.A., et al. Quantitative Fit Tested N95 Respirator-Alternatives Generated With CT Imaging and 3D Printing: A Response to Potential Shortages During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acad Radiol. 2021;.28 (2): 158-65.

2. Costa E.D., Brasil D.M., Santaella G.M., Cascante-Sequeira D., Ludovichetti F.S., Freitas D.Q. Digital Technology in Dental Education During COVID-19 Pandemic: Worldwide Experience of Professors and Students. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2021: 505-34.

3. Stemen D., Ge M., Hwang D., Qaddoumi B., Roden M., Nanda N., et al. Frame to Improve the Fit of N95 Filtering Face Mask Respirators. J Occup Environ Med. 2021; 63 (6): e362-e6.

4. Atas O., Talo Yildirim T. Evaluation of knowledge, attitudes, and clinical education of dental students about COVID-19 pandemic. PeerJ. 2020; 8: e9575.

5. Brondani M., Cua D., Maragha T., Shayanfar M., Mathu-Muju K., von Bergmann H., et al. A Pan-Canadian narrative review on the protocols for reopening dental services during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20 (1): 352.

6. Umer F., Haji Z., Zafar K. Role of respirators in controlling the spread of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) amongst dental healthcare providers: a review. Int Endod J. 2020; 53 (8): 1062-7.

7. Freitas D.Q., Ludovichetti F.S., Cascante-Sequeira D., Santaella G.M., Brasil D.M., Costa E.D. Digital Technology in Dental Education During COVID-19 Pandemic: Worldwide Experience of Professors and Students. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2021: 505-34.

8. Bakaeen L.G., Masri R., AlTarawneh S., Garcia L.T., AlHadidi A., Khamis A.H., et al. Dentists' knowledge, attitudes, and professional behavior toward the COVID-19 pandemic: A multisite survey of dentists' perspectives. J Am Dent Assoc. 2021; 152 (1): 16-24.

9. Meng L., Hua F., Bian Z. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Emerging and Future Challenges for Dental and Oral Medicine. J Dent Res. 2020; 99 (5): 481-7.

10. Ha J.F. The COVID-19 pandemic and face shields. Br J Surg. 2020; 107 (10): e398.

11. Karuppasamy K., Obuchowski N. Comparison of Fit for Sealed and Loose-Fitting Surgical Masks and N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators. Ann Work Expo Health. 2021; 65 (4): 463-74.

12. Rapisarda L., Trimboli M., Fortunato F., De Martino A., Marsico O., Demonte G., et al. Facemask headache: a new nosographic entity among healthcare providers in COVID-19 era. Neurol Sci. 2021; 42 (4): 1267-76.

13. World Health Organization. ( 2020) . Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance AWHO. Available at https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331693.

14. Ahmed A., Zhong Z., Suprono M., Savignano R., Riter H., Oyoyo U., et al. Enhancement of peripheral seal of medical face masks using a 3-dimensional-printed custom frame. J Am Dent Assoc. 2021; 152 (7): 542-50.

15. Riutord-Sbert P., Pereira T.C., de Pedro-Gomez J.E., Gonzalez-Carrasco D., Lopez-Gonzalez A.A., Barkvoll P. Study of the use of a personalized peripheral sealing device on surgical face masks in high-risk situations against COVID-19. PLoS One. 2021; 16 (8): e0253382.

16. Nishkarsh GAaG. Personal protective equipment for Health care workers donning for COVID-19 areas: Walking a tight rope between safety and comfort! J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021; 37 (2): 312-3.

17. Boskoski I., Gallo C., Wallace M.B., Costamagna G. COVID-19 pandemic and personal protective equipment shortage: protective efficacy comparing masks and scientific methods for respirator reuse. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020; 92 (3): 519-23.

18. McAvoy M., Bui A.N., Hansen C., Plana D., Said J.T., Yu Z., et al. 3D Printed frames to enable reuse and improve the fit of N95 and KN95 respirators. BMC Biomed Eng. 2021; 3 (1): 10.

19. Unoki T., Sakuramoto H., Sato R., Ouchi A., Kuribara T., Furumaya T., et al. Adverse Effects of Personal Protective Equipment Among Intensive Care Unit Healthcare Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review. SAGE Open Nurs. 2021; 7: 23779608211026164.

20. Suen L.K.P., Guo Y.P., Ho S.S.K., Au-Yeung C.H., Lam S.C. Comparing mask fit and usability of traditional and nanofibre N95 filtering facepiece respirators before and after nursing procedures. J Hosp Infect. 2020; 104 (3): 336-43.

21. Matusiak L., Szepietowska M., Krajewski P.K., Bialynicki-Birula R., Szepietowski J.C. The use of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland: A survey study of 2315 young adults. Dermatol Ther. 2020; 33 (6): e13909.

22. Pan X., Li X., Kong P., Wang L., Deng R., Wen B., et al. Assessment of Use and Fit of Face Masks Among Individuals in Public During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4 (3): e212574.

23. Meyer J.P., Héry M., Herrault J., Hubert G., François D., Hecht G., et al. Field study of subjective assessment of negative pressure half-masks. Influence of the work conditions on comfort and efficiency. Applied Ergonomics. 1997; 28 (5-6): 331-8.

24. Ong J.J.Y., Chan A.C.Y., Bharatendu C., Teoh H.L., Chan Y.C., Sharma V.K. Headache Related to PPE Use during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2021; 25 (8): 53.

25. Zaheer R., Khan M., Tanveer A., Farooq A., Khurshid Z. Association of Personal Protective Equipment with De Novo Headaches in Frontline Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. Eur J Dent. 2020;14 (S 01): S79-S85.

26. Galanis P., Vraka I., Fragkou D., Bilali A., Kaitelidou D. Impact of personal protective equipment use on health care workers' physical health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Infect Control. 2021; 49 (10): 1305-15.

27. Lemarteleur V., Fouquet V., Le Goff S., Tapie L., Morenton P., Benoit A., et al. 3D-printed protected face shields for health care workers in Covid-19 pandemic. Am J Infect Control. 2021; 49 (3): 389-91.