Chaple GAM, Gispert AEÁ, Fernández GE

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page:
PDF size: 595.21 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Scientific and technological development in the treatment of dental caries requires systematization of the teaching-learning process and an appropriate methodology fostering the acquisition of knowledge and skills necessary for professional practice.
Objective: Design and validate a tool to measure the correspondence of the curriculum and the didactic strategy to the cognitive-practical capacities required for the minimal intervention treatment of dental caries in undergraduate dental training.
Methods: A technological development study was conducted with 28 experts selected for their teaching experience, their scientific background and their knowledge about the topic. The experts contributed their opinions through self-administered questionnaires about the clarity, coherence, accuracy, relevance and layout of the tool. Use was made of content validity ratio by the Tristan method and the content validation index.
Results: All the items were found to be valid in terms of the four criteria measured, showing agreement between global and acceptable content validation indices. The tool exhibited coherence, accuracy, relevance and clarity, with content validation index values of 0.90, 0.93, 0.92 and 0.94, respectively.
Conclusions: A tool was designed and validated which is effective for its content and presentation. It is therefore available for final validation.

REFERENCES

1. Méndez-Cruz AR, Novales-Castro XJ, Ramírez-García LI, Camarena-Ocampo E, Reyes-Reali J, Calderón-Abundes U, et al. Study Plan 2016 of the licentiate of medical surgery of the faculty of higher studies iztacala. Gac Med Mex. 2017;153(3). PMID: 28763076

2. Lellis-Santos C, Abdulkader F. Smartphone-assisted experimentation as a didactic strategy to maintain practical lessons in remote education: alternatives for physiology education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Advances in physiology education. 2020 [acceso: 02/01/2021]; 44(4). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://journals.physiology.org/doi/pdf/10.1152/advan.00066.2020

3. Chaple Gil AM, Gispert Abreu EdlÁ. Generalidades sobre la mínima intervención en cariología. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2016 [acceso: 19/08/2020]; 53(2). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.revestomatologia.sld.cu/index.php/est/article/view/973

4. Fernández CE, González-Cabezas C, Fontana M. Minimum intervention dentistry in the US: an update from a cariology perspective. Br Dent J. 2020 [acceso: 08/01/2021]; 229(7). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-020-2219-x

5. Innes NP, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, et al. Managing Carious Lesions: Consensus Recommendations on Terminology. Adv Dent Res. 2016 [acceso: 08/01/2021]; 28(2). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022034516639276?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed

6. Kanzow P, Wiegand A. Teaching of composite restoration repair: Trends and quality of teaching over the past 20 years. J Dent. 2020 [acceso: 08/01/2021]; 95(1). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300571220300403?via%3Dihub

7. Chaple-Gil AM, Corrales-Reyes IE, Quintana-Muñoz L, Fernández E. Indicadores bibliométricos sobre evaluación de programas de estudio de ciencias médicas en revistas biomédicas cubanas. Rev Haban Cienc Méd. 2020 [acceso: 13/10/2020]; 19(1). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.revhabanera.sld.cu/index.php/rhab/article/view/2668

8. Boparai JK, Singh S, Kathuria P. How to Design and Validate A Questionnaire: A Guide. Current clinical pharmacology. 2018 [acceso: 22/11/2020]; 13(4). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.eurekaselect.com/164433/article

9. Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(3):269-74.

10. Casey LJ, Tuttle A, Grabell J, Hopman W, Moorehead PC, Blanchette VS, et al. Generation and optimization of the self-administered pediatric bleeding questionnaire and its validation as a screening tool for von Willebrand disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 [acceso: 22/11/2020]; 64(10). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pbc.26588

11. García Milián AJ, Alonso Carbone L, López Puig P, León Cabrera P, Segredo Pérez AM, Calvo Barbado DM. Propuesta metodológica para el análisis crítico a un programa de estudio. Ed Méd Sup. 2015 [acceso: 10/09/2020]; 29(2). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ems/v29n2/ems10215.pdf

12. García JRA, Díez BF, García CSE. Construcción y validación de un instrumento para la medida de las actitudes hacia la Expresión Corporal. Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación. 2020 [acceso: 02/01/2021]; (38). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7446303.pdf

13. Flores HP. Construcción y validación de cuestionarios sobre la práctica reflexiva y el desarrollo profesional docente. Desafios. 2020;11(1). DOI: 10.37711/desafios.2020.11.1.141

14. Goel S, Angeli F, Singla N, Ruwaard D. Development and Validation of the Motivations for Selection of Medical Study (MSMS) Questionnaire in India. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0164581. PMCID: PMC5173381

15. Caparó EV. Validación de cuestionarios. Odontología Activa. 2016;1(3). DOI: 10.31984/oactiva.v1i3.200

16. Espina A, Navarro G, Salazar L. Construcción y estudio piloto de un cuestionario para evaluar comportamientos socialmente responsables en estudiantes universitarios. Rev Psicol. 2005 [acceso: 24/12/2020]; 14(1). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://clio.uchile.cl/index.php/RDP/article/view/17418/18176

17. Charalambous A, Molassiotis A. Preliminary validation and reliability of the Short Form Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire in a lung cancer population. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 [acceso: 03/01/2021]; 26(1). Disponible en: Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ecc.12418