2022, Number 1
<< Back Next >>
Acta de Otorrinolaringología CCC 2022; 50 (1)
Food allergies in patients with benign migratory glossitis
Tamayo-Martínez GJ, Salas-Rivas GM
Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 45-50
PDF size: 155.38 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The benign migratory glossitis, also known as geographic tongue, is
a normal variant, which presents circular or irregular depapillated superficial areas.
According to the literature reviewed, its causes include allergic processes, among
these are food allergies. It was decided to carry out this investigation to determine
the prevalence of frequent food allergies in these patients using skin tests.
Materials
and methods: A descriptive, longitudinal, prospective study was carried out.
The sample consisted of 27 patients in the period January-August 2018, carriers of
geographic tongue who underwent skin-type allergic tests to determine food allergies.
Results: 59.3% were women without statistically significant predominance, the
most frequent allergic history was allergic rhinitis. The most frequent history of food
allergy was to dairy. Regarding the results of the tests for milk and shellfish, they
were positive in 55.6%, followed by fish 14.8%, eggs and nuts with 11.1% respectively.
The prevalence of positivity for at least one test was 85.2% with a statistically
significant predominance over the negative result.
Discussion: There is currently not
enough literature that discusses the possible etiologies of benign migratory glossitis.
Within the allergic history, allergic rhinitis was the most frequent, followed by food
allergy. Until now there are few investigations that study this prevalence of food
allergies in patients in a specific way.
Conclusion: Geographic tongue does not have
a predominant epidemiological factor, an allergic history can be a predisposing factor,
food allergy can be a trigger for presentation of geographic language.
REFERENCES
Nandini DB, Bhavana SB, Deepak BS, Ashwini R. Paediatricgeographic tongue: A case report, review and recent updates.J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(2):ZE05-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16452.7191.
Shahzad M, Sattar A, Faran S. Geographic tongue: Case reportand literature review. Pak Oral Dental J. 2014;34(3):409-10.
Jainkittivong A, Langlis RP. Geographic tongue: clinicalcharacteristics of 188 cases. J Contemp Dent Pract.2005;1(6):123-35.
Saturno E, Sorensen R. Alergias alimentarias y reacciones adversasa medicamentos: conceptos generales. En: Cardona R, Serrano C(editores). Alergias: abordaje clínico diagnóstico y tratamiento. 1ªedición. Colombia: Panamericana. 2010. p 465-71.
Patil S, Kaswan S, Rahman F, Doni B. Prevalence of tonguelesions in the Indian population. J Clin Exp Dent 2013;5(3):128-32. doi: 10.4317/jced.51102.
Rezaei F, Safarzadeh M, Mozafari H, Tavakoli P. Prevalenceof geographic tongue and Related predisposing factors in 7-18year-old students in Kermanshah, Iran 2014. Glob J Health Sci.2015;7(5):91-5. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p91.
Marshall M, Feldstedt M, Fernández J, Fernández A, EsguepS. Prevalencia de la lengua geográfica en niños chilenos de 7a 10 años de edad. Int J Odontostomat. 2014;8(2):235-40. doi:10.4067/S0718-381X2014000200015.
Shulman JD. Prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in childrenand youths in USA. Int J Paediatr Dent 2005;2:89-97. doi:10.1111/j.1365-263X.2005.00632.x.
Vidal A, Jímenez M, Luna R, Mayda L. Prevalence oftongue alterations and related factors in children attendingthe University of Cartagena, Colombia. Rev Odont Mex.2013;17(4):231-5.
Shamsoulmolouk N, Narges G, Elahe A, MohammadJ. Treatment of symptomatic geographic tongue withtriamcinolone acetonide alone and in combination withretinoic acid: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent (Tehran).2016;13(1):23-8.
Merchena L, Fernández C. Etiología de la lengua geográfica.Rev Eur Odontoestomatol [Internet]. Publicado el 19 de juniode 2015. Citado el 06 de marzo de 2017. Disponible en: http://www.redoe.com/ver.php?id=193
Marks R, Simons MJ. Geographic tongue - A manifestation ofatopy. Br J Dermatol. 1979;101(2):159-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1979.tb05601.x.
Chaubal T, Bapat R. Geographic tongue. Am J Med.2017;130(12):e533-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.06.016.
Kumar T, Puri G, Aravinda K, Arora N. Benign migratoryglossitis: A rare presentation of a common disorder. J IndianAcad Oral Med Radiol. 2015;27:112-4.
Mehta V. Benign migratory glossitis: Report of a rare casewith review of literature. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther.2017;6(4):123-5. doi: 10.15406/jdhodt.2017.06.00210.
Bartuzi Z, Kaczmarski M, Czerwionka-Szaflarska M,Małaczyńska T, Krogulska A. The diagnosis and managementof food allergies. Position paper of the Food Allergy Sectionthe Polish Society of Allergology. Postepy Dermatol Alergol.2017;34(5):391-404. doi: 10.5114/ada.2017.71104.
Devdas J, Mckie C, Fox A, Ratageri V. Food allergy in children.Indian J Pediatr. 2018;85(5):369-74. doi: 10.1007/s12098-017-2535-6.
Lesan S, Goudarzi N, Heidarnazhad H, Hassan M. Comparisonof the prevalence of geographic tongue in asthmatic patientsand healthy subjects in Masih Daneshvari Hospital in 2014.J Res Dentomaxillofac Sci. 2017;2(1):1-5. doi: 10.29252/jrdms.2.1.1.
Dafar A, Çevik-Aras H, Robledo J, Mattsson U, JontellM. Factors associated with geographic tongue and fissuredtongue. Acta Odontol Scand. 2016;74(3):210-6. doi:10.3109/00016357.2015.1087046.
Honarmand M, Farhad L, Shirzaiy M, Sehhatpour M.Geographic tongue and associated risk factor among Iraniandental patients. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(2):215-9.
Sowmya S, Pushpalatha C, Roopa R. Benign migratoryglossitis: A case of hereditary aetiology. J Dental Med Sci.2016;15(8):109-11. doi: 10.9790/0853-150802109111.
Dafar A. Factors associated with geographic tongue[dissertation]. Suecia: Elsevier; 2016.
Barton D, Spier S, Crovello T. Benign migratory glossitis andallergy. Pediatr Dent. 1982;4(3):249-50.