medigraphic.com

2001, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Arch Cardiol Mex 2001; 71 (S1)

Future development of cardiovascular surgery. New prosthesis and approach ways

López SF

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 102-105
PDF size: 34.74 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Valvular surgery has evolved in the last year with the development of new valvular prostheses and new minimally invasive implanting techniques. We discuss the advantages of the new mechanical aortic prostheses of superior hemodynamic characteristics, which avoid the need to widen the valvular ring in many cases. At the sametime, we emphasize on the use of new biological aortic prostheses, with minimal transvalvular gradient and less incidence of calcification. The advantages and disadvantages of the different minimally invasive techniques are analized without reaching yet a definite conclusion on their application.


REFERENCES

  1. BAILEY CP: The surgical treatment of mitral stenosis. Dis Chest 1949; 15: 377.

  2. GIBSON JH: Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med 1954; 37: 171-76.

  3. STARR A, EDWARDS ML: Mitral replacement: Clinical experience with a ball-valve prosthesis. Ann Sur 1961; 154: 762-69.

  4. BJORK VO: A new tilting disc valve prosthesis. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969; 3: 1-7.

  5. HANSON DW: St-Jude prosthesis. 1977.

  6. ROSS DM: Homograft replacement of the aortic valve. Lancet 1962; 2: 487-92.

  7. REIS RL, HANCOCK WS: The flexible stent: A New concept in the fabrication of tissue valve. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 1971; 62: 683-85.

  8. CARPENTIER A, DUBOST A: From xenograft to bioprosthesis. Biological tissue heart valve replacement. London. Butter worth 1971; 515-41.

  9. IONESCU MI: Results of aortic valve replacement with frame supported pericardial grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1972; 64: 340-46.

  10. CARBALLO B: ACC/AHA Guidelins for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Task force report. JACC 1998; 32: 1486-1588.

  11. HAMMERMEISTER KE: A comparison of outcomes in men 11 years after heart-valve replacement with a mechanical valve or bioprosthesis. New Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1289-96.

  12. DAVID TE: Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine bioprostheses. J Cardiac Surg 1988; 3: 501-05.

  13. HAYASHIDA N: Hemodinamic performance of St-Jude Medical hemodynamic plus valve. Artificial organs 1997; 21: 916-22.

  14. TWEDEN KS: Silver coating of cardiovascular textiles for antimicrobial protection. 43º annual ASAIO Conference. Atlanta. Ga. 1997.

  15. COSGROVE DM: Partial sternotomy for mitral valve operations. Cardiac Thoracic Surg 1998; 3: 62-65.

  16. GROSSI EA: Port-Access approach for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Cardiac Thorac Surg 1998; 3: 32-36.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com