Mauri PO, Louit HA, Fonte ST, Sosa CM, Valdes PO, Candebat RR

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 1-13
PDF size: 489.69 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Metastatic tumors are the most frequent in the spine.
Objective: To evaluate surgical results in patients with epidural spine metastatic tumors, according to pain before and after surgery, their neurological status, and disability index.
Methods: This is a retrospective longitudinal descriptive study in a sample of 34 patients older than 20 years- longitudinal descriptive study in a sample of 34 patients aged 20 or over from a universe made up of 62 patients. They had spinal metastases, they were treated at Hermanos Ameijeiras hospital from January 2016 to March 2018. They underwent surgery with a decompression technique by corpectomy and spinal fixation. Pain intensity was verified using Denis scale; neurological status using Frankel scale and the percentage of disability using Oswestry scale. Statistical significance tests were applied. The investigation complied with the principles of Declaration of Helsinki.
Results: Patients aged 40 to 59 years (64.7%) and male (67.6%) predominated. The most frequent primary tumor was hematopoietic (41.2%), with involvement of the thoracic segment (57.9%). The Cuban technique was the most used (44.1%). During the preoperative period, the majority were in Denis III, with Frankel D and 66.2% were disabled. At the postoperative evaluation, the majority were in Denis between 0 and 1, Frankel E with preservation of neurological status and 31.4% of disability (p= 0.000).
Conclusions: Surgical treatment of patients with vertebral metastases by means of instrumentation and decompression has clinical benefits, above all, the improvement of pain and neurological function.

REFERENCES

1. Sharif S, Qadeer M. Metasttatic Spine- A review. W ScJ 2016;1:58-63.

2. Sciubba DM, Goodwin CR, Yunter A, Ju D, Gokaslan ZL, Fisher C, et al. A systematic review of clinical outcomes and prognosis factors for patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases secondary to breast cancer. Global Spine J. 2016;6(5):482-96.

3. Bakar D, Tanenbaum J, Phan K, Alentado V, Steinmetz M, Benzel E, et al. Decompression surgery for spinal metastases: a Systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2016; 41(2): E2. doi: https://doi:10.3171/2016.6.FOCUS16166

4. Goodwin R, Abu-Bonsrah N, Rhines L. Molecular Markers and Targeted Therapeuticts in metastatic tumors of spine. Spine. 2016;41(20):218-23.

5. Acosta HF, Sosa KF. Caracterización clínica epidemiológica de pacientes operados de tumores raquimedulares. Rev Cubana Med Milit. 2019 [10/12/2020];48(1). Disponible en: http://www.revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/196

6. Ottenhausen M, Ntoulias G, Bodhinayake I, Ruppert F-H, Schreiber S, Förschler A, et al. Intradural spinal tumors in adults -update on management and outcome. Neurosurgical Rev. 2019;42(2):371-88.

7. Versteeg AL, Verlaan JJ, Sahgal A. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score: Impact on Oncologic Decision-Making. Spine. 2016:41(20):S231-S237.

8. Hansen-Algenstaedt N, Kwan M, Algenstaedt P, Chiu CK, Viezens L, Chan TS, et al. Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for patients with spinal metastasis. Spine Sur. 2017;42:789-97.

9. Mena Pérez R, Rubinos Ruiz R, Candebat Candebat R. La corpectomía transpedicular en fracturas de columna toracolumbar. Rev Cubana Ortopedia Traumatol. 2009 [15/02/2020];23(2). Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-215X2009000200004&lng=es

10. Hem S, Beltrame S, Rasmussen J, Vecchi E, Landriel F, Yampolsky C. Utilidad de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva (miss) en el manejo de las metástasis espinales toraco-lumbares. Rev Argent Neuroc. 2018;32(2):121-33.

11. Asociación Médica Mundial. Declaración de Helsinki. Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. Corea: Representación AMM; 2008 [acceso 12/06/20]. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/recursos/helsinki.pdf

12. Jee TK, Lee S-H, Kim HJ, Kim E-S, Eoh W. Spinal metastasis of thymic carcinoma as a rare manifestation: a summary of 7 consecutive cases. Korean J Spine. 2014; 11(3):157.

13. Bordes-Monmeneu M, Bordes-García V, Rodrigo-Baeza F, Sáez D. Sistema de neutralización dinámica en la columna lumbar: SISTEMA DYNESYS Experiencia en 94 casos. Neurocirugía. 2005;16(6):499-506.

14. Domínguez M, Borri AE, Bazán PL, Medina M. Enfoque terapéutico de las metástasis de neoplasias mielo-linfoproliferativas en la columna vertebral. Rev Asociación Argentina Ortopedia y Traumatología. 2016;81(1):7-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.15417/495

15. De la Torre-González D, Martín D, Aguilar-Araiza MA, Ávila-Fuentes DN, Robles-Pérez E, Ramos-Cano VH, et al. Tumores metastásicos a la columna vertebral. Rev Hospital Juárez de México. 2013;80(3):168-72.

16. Matsumoto M, Tsuji T, Iwanami A, Watanabe K, Hosogane N, Ishii K, et al. Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal metastasis of differentiated thyroid cancers: a long-term follow-up. Clin Spine Sur. 2013;26(4):E137-E42.

17. Dunning EC, Butler JS, Morris S. Complications in the management of metastatic spinal disease. World J Orthoped. 2012;3(8):114.

18. Andrade Neto J, BPC Fontes, RDA Macedo, Christiano Esteves S. Patients with spinal metastasis submitted to neurological decompression and stabilization. Coluna/Columna 2016;15(3):230-34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-185120161503147903.

19. Hernández Ochoa J, Fuentes Vega Z. Síndrome de compresión medular en el paciente con patologías oncológicas. Correo Científico Méd. 2015;19(1):85-97.

20. Vergara IDC, Morales FR, Corona JN, Soriano JCA. Tratamiento posterolateral de fractura vertebral patológica y corpectomía en un mismo procedimiento quirúrgico. Rev Especialidades Méd Quirúr. 2014;19(2):200-4.

21. Alcántara-Bumbiedro S, Flórez-García M, Echávarri-Pérez C, García-Pérez F. Escala de incapacidad por dolor lumbar de Oswestry. Rehabilitación. 2006;40(3):150-8.