2022, Number 05
Value of fertility-sparing surgery for young females with epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparative study.
Language: English
References: 17
Page: 427-433
PDF size: 208.01 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Objective: In the current study, we aimed to compare between radical surgery and fertility saving surgery in females with stage 1A-C EOC regarding recurrence rate and patients survival rates in addition to evaluating reproductive and obstetric outcomes for stage I EOC females who were managed by fertility saving surgery.Patients and Methods: We prospectively identified 60 patients diagnosed with stage I EOC aged ≤ 40 years. Patients in the fertility-preservation group underwent salpingo-oophorectomy on the side of the affected ovary in addition to incisional biopsy or wedge excision of the ovary on the other side. Patients in the radical surgery group underwent total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. We followed up all patients for 5 years to assess their reproductive and oncological outcomes.
Results: Patients in the fertility preservation surgery group were significantly younger (30 ± 4 versus 35± 5) (p ‹ 0.001), their tumor sizes were smaller 3.4 ± 1.3 versus 6.0 ± 2.6 (p ‹ 0.001), of lower grade (p = 0.011), earlier stage (p ‹ 0.001) and has more mucinous histology than patients in the radical surgery group. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding tumor recurrence or survival rates. Of 25 patients underwent fertility preservation surgery, 18/25 (72%) tried to get pregnant. 15/18 (83%) pregnancies were recorded, including 13 live births, 1 miscarriage, and 1 intrauterine fetal death.
Conclusion: Fertility sparing surgery could be adequate alternative to radical surgery for young females with stage I EOC.
REFERENCES
Kajiyama H, Yoshihara M, Tamauchi S, Yoshikawa N, Suzuki S, Kikkawa F. Fertility-Sparing surgery for young women with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: a multicenteric comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X 4 (2019). https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100071
Ledermann JA, Raja FA, Fotopoulou C, Gonzalez-Martin A, Colombo N and Sessa C; ESMO Guidelines Working Group: Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2013; 24 (Suppl 6): vi24-vi32. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt333
Mandelbaum RS, Klar M, Takiuchi T, Bainvoll L, Matsuzaki S, Paulson R and Matsuo K. Fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Contemporary oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2020; 46 (8): 1263-81. https:// doi.org/10.1111/jog.14302
Fruscio R, Ceppi L, Corso S, Galli F, Dell'Anna T, Dell'Orto F, Giuliani D, Garbi A, Chiari S, Mangioni C, Milani R, Floriani I, Colombo N, et al. Long-term results of fertility-sparing treatment compared with standard radical surgery for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 2016; 115: 641-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.254
Kajiyama H, Mizuno M, Shibata K, Yamamoto E, Kawai M, Nagasaka T, Kikkawa F. Recurrence-predicting prognostic factors for patients with early stage epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing fertility-sparing surgery: a multiinstitutional study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014; 175: 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.01.014
Ditto A, Martinelli F, Bogani G, Lorusso D, Carcangiu M, Chiappa V, Reato C, Donfrancesco C, De Carrillo KJ, Raspagliesi F. Long-term safety of fertility sparing surgery in early stage ovarian cancer: comparison to standard radical surgical procedures. Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 138: 78-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.004
Bentivegna E, Fruscio R, Roussin S, Ceppi L, Satoh T, Kajiyama H, Uzan C, Colombo N, Gouy S, Morice P. Long-term follow-up of patients with an isolated ovarian recurrence after conservative treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: review of the results of an international multicenter study comprising 545 patients. Fertil Steril 2015; 104: 1319-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.008