medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2022, Number 05

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2022; 90 (05)

Influence of pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity in pregnancy and perinatal outcomes

Ruipérez-Pacheco E, Carmona-Payán P, Blázquez-Barbero E, Herráiz-Martínez MÁ

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 385-394
PDF size: 217.87 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: Primary: to compare the differences in the route of birth (cesarean section, instrumental or euthyroid delivery) between pregnant women with BMI ≥ 25 and less than 25. Secondary: to compare the different gestational and puerperal complications in pregnant women with BMI ≥ 25 and less than 25.
Materials and Methods: Analytical, longitudinal, observational, cohort and retrospective study performed in patients attended between December 2010 and December 2015 at the Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. Study parameters: natural or assisted conception, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertensive disease and hypothyroidism, fetal weight and weeks of pregnancy at termination, induction and its causes, route of delivery and puerperal complications.
Results: We studied 642 pregnant women with age limits of 13 and 45 years, mean 32 years. The risk of cesarean section was 1.6 times higher in pregnant women with BMI ≥ 25. This group had twice as many gestational diabetes and macrosomic fetuses and three times more gestational hypertension than pregnant women with normal BMI. Labor inductions and puerperium complications had a higher trend in higher BMIs, with no statistically significant differences.
Conclusions: A higher incidence of cesarean section, diabetes, gestational hypertension and macrosomic fetuses was found in patients who started pregnancy overweight or obese compared to those with normal weight. The outcomes obtained justify the importance of an intervention in these cases to recommend adequate nutritional habits and an active lifestyle to achieve a healthy weight prior to pregnancy.


REFERENCES

  1. Soderlund D. Consecuencias de la obesidad en la reproducción y en el embarazo. Rev Esp Med Quir 2016; 21 (2): 65- 71. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/473/47346026004.pdf

  2. Valdés E, Bencosme N. Frecuencia de obesidad y su relación con algunas complicaciones maternas y perinatales en una comunidad indígena. Rev Cubana Endocrinol 2015; 26(3): 238-45. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/end/v26n3/end04315.pdf

  3. Shaikh H, Robinson S, Teoh TG. Management of maternal obesity prior to and during pregnancy. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 15(2): 77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2009.10.003

  4. Sánchez FJ. La obesidad, un grave problema de salud pública. An Real Acad Farm 2016; 82: 6-26. https://analesranf. com/wp-content/uploads/2016/82_ex2/82ex2_02.pdf

  5. Heslehurst N, Simpson H, Ells LJ, Rankin J, Wilkinson J, Lang R, et al. The impact of maternal BMI status on pregnancy outcomes with immediate short-term obstetric resource implications: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2008; 9 (6): 635-83. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00511.x

  6. Lozano A, Waleska R, Melendez B, Turcios Urbina LJ, Cueva Núñez JE, Ocampo Eguigurems DM, et al. Sobrepeso y obesidad en el embarazo: Complicaciones y manejo. Archivos de Medicina 2016; 12 (3): 11. doi: 10.3823/1310

  7. Gunatilake RP, Perlow JH. Obesity and pregnancy: clinical management of the obese gravida. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 204 (2):106-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.10.002

  8. De la Calle, María et al. Sobrepeso y obesidad pregestacional como factor de riesgo de cesárea y complicaciones perinatales. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2009; 74 (4): 233-38. doi: 10.4067/S0717-75262009000400005.

  9. Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287.213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes and Relat Metab Disord 2011; 25: 1175-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801670

  10. Khashan AS, Kenny LC. The effects of maternal body mass index on pregnancy outcome. Eur J Epidemiol 2009; 24 (11): 697-705. doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9375-2

  11. Gallo JL, Díaz López MA, Gómez Fernández J et al. Síndrome metabólico en obstetricia. Clín Invest Ginecol Obstet 2010; 37 (6): 239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gine.2010.03.005

  12. Aguilar Redondo R, et al. Uso de la clasificación de Robson en un Hospital Comarcal de España para reducir la tasa de cesáreas. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2016; 81 (2): 99-104. doi: 10.4067/S0717-75262016000200003

  13. Dempsey A, Diamond KA, Bonney EA, Myers JE. Cesarean section: techniques and complications. Obstetrics Gynaecology Reprod Med 2017; 27 (2): 37-43. doi: 10.1016/j. ogrm.2013.12.002

  14. Nápoles D, Piloto M. Consideraciones actuales sobre la operación cesárea. MEDISA 2012; 16 (10): 1579- 95. http:// scielo.sld.cu/pdf/san/v16n10/san131012.pdf

  15. Rodríguez E, López B, López AM, Ortega RM. Prevalencia de sobrepeso y obesidad en adultos españoles. Nutr Hosp 2011; 26 (2): 355-63. doi: 10.3305/nh.2011.26.2.4918

  16. Gómez Sosa E. Trastornos hipertensivos durante el embarazo. Rev Cubana Obstet Ginecol 2000; 26 (2): 99-114. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront. net/35162608/trastornos_hipertensivos_durante_el_ embarazo.-libre.pdf?1413502102=&response-content-di sposition=inline%3B+filename%3DTrastornos_hipertensivos_ durante_el_emba.pdf&Expires=1647128995&Sig nature=IWcgaX5x3tvZrLbD3A-ILTAEraDmtg5DytLEmaq hjVv~20YQG9M567Gw8nrCthIYPStLfafTvUuIzRM4pOX mzHjRER43NMyvDc5MWXF3TuV-~5drW6gT6hzQWTb- FhRz72PFe1tjbe635Z31KwkRky1bBe0eulORjev9AZH0njXr8EXm- uPKKjgqa-Fy4VQWMgd2R~12lSSHWCKyztRB 19DGz~9WyVEKTqq1Esvl9wVnC2AH7wXRWRrXQy6ifYJ Mo-UTYevVa26aRwtaLp5AKVfTzxp8abQ7WO0tg5SlR66Ht asrbPja75Si172S~-DdUSbn7uZQkHOntF6905Niyg__&Key- Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

  17. Abalovich M, Gauna A, Gutiérrez S, Mereshian P, et al. Tiroideopatías y embarazo. Rev Argent Endocrinol Metab 2007; 44 (3): 160-5. http://www.scielo.org.ar/pdf/raem/ v44n3/v44n3a05.pdf

  18. Abulhaj M, Martínez S, Rodríguez I, Redondo RM, Teva García MJ. Análisis de la tasa de detección mediante ecografía de fetos con crecimiento intrauterino restringido y pequeño para la edad gestacional. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2012; 77 (4): 259-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717- 75262012000400004

  19. Carrascosa A, Ferrández A, Yeste D, García-Dihinx J, Romo A, Copil A, Almar J, Salcedo S et al. Estudio transversal español de crecimiento 2008. Parte I: valores de peso y longitud en recién nacidos de 26-42 semanas de edad gestacional. An Pediatr (Barc) 2008; 68: 544-51. doi: 10.1157/13123287

  20. Sultan AH. Obstetric perineal injury and anal incontinence. Clin Risk 1999;5193-6. https://doi. org/10.1177/135626229900500601

  21. Shah PS, Zao J. Induced termination of pregnancy and low birthweight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Brit J Obstet and Gynecol 2009; 116: 1425- 42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02278.x

  22. Poobalan AS, Aucott LS, Grurung T, Smith WC, Bhatta- Charya S. Obesity as an independent risk of factor for elective and emergency caesarian delivery in nulliparous women-systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Obes Rev 2009; 10: 28-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1467- 789X.2008.00537.x

  23. Aune D et al. Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2014; 311: 1536-1546. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2269




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com