medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Print)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2021; 23 (3)

Superficial Effects of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Color Change of Resin-Based CAD/CAM Blocks

Aydın N, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Aybala OE, Ers鰖 B

Language: English
References: 35
Page: 87-97
PDF size: 256.74 Kb.


ABSTRACT

CAD/CAM blocks are widely used in dental restorations around the world. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different polishing and finishing systems on surface roughness and color change of resin-based CAD/CAM blocks. In this study, material samples of 2󬱙2mm were prepared. In three different experimental groups, surface polishing was carried out with one-step, two-step and multi-step polishing systems. The samples in one subgroup of each experimental group were polished with the diamond paste. Once the initial roughness and color values of the samples were measured using a profilometer and a spectrophotometer, the samples were immersed in coffee. Surface roughness and color change (ΔE00) results were statistically analyzed using two-way variance analysis (ANOVA). Finishing and polishing systems created significantly different levels of surface roughness on the hybrid ceramic block (Vita Enamic) but not on the composites block (Brilliant Crios, Grandio Blocs). While the two-step and multi-step finishing and polishing systems produced the lowest color change on hybrid ceramic blocks, one-step and two-step systems achieved this on composite blocks (p‹0.05). In all test groups, the supplementary polishing performed after regular polishing procedures helped us reduce the surface roughness and color change on CAD/CAM blocks. The findings obtained in this study suggest that one and two-step polishing systems are more suitable for resin-based composite CAD/CAM blocks; for hybrid ceramic CAD/CAM blocks, on the other hand, two and multi-step finishing and polishing systems seem to be more efficient concerning lower surface roughness and resistance to color changes.


REFERENCES

  1. Awad D., Stawarczyk B., Liebermann A., Ilie N. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 113 (6): 534-540.

  2. Coldea A., Swain M.V., Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated ceramic- network materials. Dent Mater. 2013; 29 (4): 419-426.

  3. Chen C., Trindade F.Z., de Jager N., et al. The fracture resistance of a CAD/CAM resin nano ceramic (RNC) and a CAD ceramic at different thicknesses. Dent Mater. 2014; 30 (9): 954-962.

  4. Acar O., Yilmaz B., Altintas S.H., Chandrasekaran I., Johnston W.M. Color stainability of CAD/CAM and nanocomposite resin materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115 (1): 71-75.

  5. Kumari R.V., Nagaraj H., Siddaraju K., Poluri R.K. Evaluation of the effect of surface polishing, oral beverages and food colorants on color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposite resins. J Int Oral Heal. 2015; 7 (7): 63-70.

  6. Lainović T., Bla瀒ć L., Kukuruzović D. et al. Effect of diamond paste finishing on surface topography and roughness of dental nanohybrid composites-AFM analysis. Procedia Engineering. 2014; 69: 945-951.

  7. Bollen C.M.L., Lambrechts P., Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater. 1997; 13 (4): 258-269.

  8. Park J.W., An J.S., Lim W.H. et al. Microbial changes in biofilms on composite resins with different surface roughness: An in vitro study with a multispecies biofilm model. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 122 (5): 493.e1-8.

  9. St-Pierre L., Martel C., Cr閜eau H., Vargas M.A. Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resins: polishability of composite resins. Oper Dent. 2019; 44 (3): 122-132.

  10. Kakaboura A., Fragouli M., Rahiotis C., Silikas N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007; 18: 155-163.

  11. Neme A.L., Frazier K.B., Roeder L.B., Debner T.L. Effect of prophylacti polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent. 2002; 27: 50-58.

  12. Patel S.B., Gordan V.V., Barrett A.A., Shen C. The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135 (5): 587-594.

  13. Sham A.S., Chu F.C., Chai J., Chow T.W. Color stability of provisional prosthodontic materials. J Prosth Dent. 2004; 91 (5): 447-452.

  14. Bagheri R., Burrow M.F., Tyas M. Influence of food‑simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005; 33 (5): 389‑398.

  15. Fontes S.T., Fern醤dez M.R., de Moura C.M., Meireles S.S. Color stability of a nanofill composite: Effect of different immersion media. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17: 388‑391.

  16. Aydın N., Karaoglanoglu S., Oktay E.A., Kılı鏰rslan M.A. Investigating the color changes on resin-based CAD/CAM blocks. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020; 32 (2): 251-256.

  17. Chang J.Y., Chen W.C., Huang T.K., et al. Evaluating the accurarcy of tooth color measurement by combining the Munsell color system and dental colorimeter. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012; 28 (9): 490-494.

  18. Wang F., Takahashi H., Iwasaki N. Translucency of dental ceramics with different thickness. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 110 (1): 14-20.

  19. Paravina R.D., P閞ez M.M., Ghinea R. Acceptability and perceptibility thresholds in dentistry: A comprehensive review of clinical and research applications. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019; 31 (2): 1-10.

  20. Paravina R.D., Ghinea R., Herrera L.J., et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015; 27: 1-9.

  21. Lopes G.C., Vieira L.C., Araujo E. Direct composite resin restorations: A review of some clinical procedures to achieve predictable results in posterior teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004; 16 (1): 19-32.

  22. Jung M., Eichelberger K., Klimek J. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple step polishing. Oper Dent. 2007;32: 347-355.

  23. Rodrigues-Junior S.A., Chemin P.P., Ferracane J.L. Surface roughness and gloss of actual composites as polished with different polishing systems. Oper Dent. 2015; 40 (4): 418-429.

  24. Flury S., Diebold E., Peutzfeldt A., Lussi A. Effect of artificial toothbrushing and water storage on the surface roughness and micromechanical properties of tooth-colored CAD-CAM materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117 (6): 767-774.

  25. Alamoush R.A., Silikas N., Salim N.A., Al-Nasrawi S., Satterthwaite JD. Effect of the composition of CAD/CAM composite blocks on mechanical properties. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 1-8.

  26. Costa G.F.A.D., Fernandes A.C.B.C.J., Carvalhho L.A.O., et al. Effect of additional polishing methods on the physical surface properties of different nanocomposites: SEM and AFM study. Microsc Res Tech. 2018; 81 (12): 1467-1473.

  27. Nasim I., Neelakantan P., Sujeer R., Subbarao C.V. Color stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanocomposite resins-an in vitro study. J Dent 2010; 38: 137-142.

  28. Zenth鰂er A., Cabrera T., Corcodel N., Rammelsberg P., Hassel A.J. Comparison of the easyshade compact and advance in vitro and in vivo. Clin Oral Invest. 2014; 18 (5): 1473-1479.

  29. Paul S., Peter A., Pietrobon N. H鋗merle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res. 2002; 81: 578-582.

  30. Sharma G., Wu W., Dalal E. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color Res Appl. 2005; 30: 21-30.

  31. G髆ez-Polo C., Portillo Mu駉z M., Lorenzo Luengo et al. Comparison of the CIELab and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115 (1): 65-70.

  32. Kanat-Ert黵k B. Color stability of CAD/CAM ceramics prepared with different surface finishing procedures. J Prosthodont. 2020: 29 (2): 166-172.

  33. Kurt A., 莈lik G. Evaluation of physical and optical propertıes of hybrid CAD/CAM materıals. J Dent Fac Atat黵k Uni. 2018; 28: 498-503.

  34. Seyidaliyeva A., Rues S., Evagorou Z., et al. Color stability of polymer infiltrated ceramics compared with lithium disilicate ceramics and composite. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020; 32:43-50.

  35. Liebermann A., Wimmer T., Schmidlin P.R., et al. Physicomec- hanical characterization of polyetheretherketone and current esthetic dental CAD/CAM polymers after aging in different storage media. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 115 (3): 321-328.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com