2021, Number 6
Visual prostate symptom score (VPSS). Is it an effective alternative for the assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms? Experience in a reference center in southeastern Mexico
Language: English
References: 8
Page:
PDF size: 326.79 Kb.
ABSTRACT
The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) assesses lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). In our Department, we receive Mayan-speaking patients with low educational levels, which makes it difficult for them to understand the questionnaire. The visual prostate symptom score (VPSS) overcomes these barriers.Objectives: To correlate the VPSS score with the IPSS one, in patients with LUTS who attend the Urology Department of the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad, to determine the prevalence of patients requiring assistance in answering both instruments. The correlation between the IPSS and VPSS and the Qmax of these patients will be evaluated.
Material and methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was performed in men of 40 years of age or older with LUTS, between January 2019 to January 2020. Uroflowmetry was performed and the VPSS and IPSS were applied to them, identifying those who required help to answer the questions. Pearson or Spearman correlation tests were performed according to the distribution of the data, evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 or Fischer’s test.
Results: Eighty-one men with LUTS were included. The mean age was 62.89+9.52. A significant correlation was found between total VPSS and total IPSS (r=0.708, p‹0.001). 83.8% (n=67) of patients were able to answer the IPSS, and 98.8% (n=79) were able to answer the VPSS. The percentage of patients who required help to solve the IPSS was 43.5% (n=34) and the VPSS was 25% (n=20). No significant correlations were found between VPSS and Qmax (r=-.123, p=0.277), and IPSS and Qmax (r=-0.085, p=0.456).
Conclusions: The VPSS is a useful instrument in the assessment of LUTS, as it correlates with the IPSS. It also overcomes the barriers of language and educational level. However, it overestimates the severity of the symptoms referred by the patient. Then, studies are needed to improve this instrument
REFERENCES
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology. 2003;61(1):37–49. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02243-4
Roy A, Singh A, Sidhu DS, Jindal RP, Malhotra M, Kaur H. New Visual Prostate Symptom Score versus International Prostate Symptom Score in Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Prospective Comparision in Indian Rural Population. Niger J Surg Off Publ Niger Surg Res Soc. 2016 Dec;22(2):111–7. doi: https://doi. org/10.4103/1117-6806.189002
van der Walt CLE, Heyns CF, Groeneveld AE, Edlin RS, van Vuuren SPJ. Prospective comparison of a new visual prostate symptom score versus the international prostate symptom score in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Urology. 2011 Jul;78(1):17–20. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.01.065
Ceylan Y, Gunlusoy B, Degirmenci T, Kozacioglu Z, Bolat D, Minareci S. Is new visual prostate symptom score useful as International Prostate Symptom Score in the evaluation of men with lower urinary tract symptoms? A prospective comparison of 2 symptom scores in Turkish society. Urology. 2015 Mar;85(3):653–7. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.057
Setthawong V, Mahawong P, Pattanachindakun N, Amnattrakul P, Dar FM, Thanavongvibul S. To investigate the correlation between the visual prostate symptom score, the international prostate symptom score, and uroflowmetry parameters in adult Thai males of different educational levels. Prostate Int. 2018 Sep;6(3):115–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. prnil.2017.12.001