medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)

2020, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2020; 33 (3)

Visual acuity and quality of life of patients undergoing phakic intraocular lens implantation

Li F, Cárdenas DT, Guerra AM, Pérez SRG

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 1-14
PDF size: 439.47 Kb.


ABSTRACT

High refractive errors are difficult to correct both optically and surgically. Patients suffering from them feel uncomfortable with their eyeglasses, since their visual quality is poor. Contact lenses provide better visual acuity, but they sometimes require special designs to be adjusted and may be associated to severe complications. The subspecialty of refractive surgery seeks to improve uncorrected visual acuity and reduce dependence on eyeglasses or contact lenses. Options range from keratorefractive procedures to intraocular lens implantation, be it with removal of the transparent crystalline lens or in phakic eyes. The latter provides the advantages of maintaining accommodation, obtaining better visual quality and affording a certain degree of reversibility. A great many studies have been conducted worldwide of patients with phakic lenses of various models, and these have proved to be safe and reliable. However, not many studies are available about long-term quality of life. Hence the motivation to perform an updated search for published papers about the subject, with the purpose of describing the visual results and quality of life of patients with phakic lens implants. Use was made of the Infomed platform, particularly the Virtual Health Library with all its search engines.


REFERENCES

  1. Cantor LB. Refractive Surgery. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology (Basic and Clinical Science Course); 2015-2016.

  2. Kohnen T, Maxwell WA, Holland S. Correction of Moderate to High Myopia with a Foldable, Angle-Supported Phakic Intraocular Lens: Results from a 5-Year Open-Label Trial. Am Acad Ophthalmol. 2016;123:1027-35.

  3. Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Cavas F, Yébana Rubio P, Sala E. Anangle-supported foldable phakic intraocular lens for correction of myopia: A five-year follow-up. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2017;92(1):4-11.

  4. Cárdenas T, Li F, Pérez R, Cruz D, Monteagudo K, Cabrera Y. Resultados visuales en la corrección de alta miopía con implante de lente fáquica ACR-128. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2019 [acceso: 16/08/2020];32(2). Disponible en: http://revoftalmologia.sld.cu/index.php/oftalmologia/article/view/611

  5. Pérez Jiménez D, Lupón i Bas M. Evaluación de la calidad de vida relacionada con la visión. Gaceta; 2017 [acceso: 16/08/2020];521: Disponible en: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2117/

  6. Rodríguez B, Duarte N, Hormigó I, Méndez A, García J. Calidad de vida relativa a la función visual en pacientes operados de catarata. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2019 [acceso: 16/08/2020];32(1). Disponible en: http://www.revoftalmologia.sld.cu/index.php/oftalmologia/article/view/698

  7. Hirneiss C. The impact of a better-seeing eye and a worse-seeing eye on vision-related quality of life. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014;8:1703-9.

  8. Payal AR, Sola-Del Valle D, González-González LA, Cakiner-Egilmez T, Chomsky AS, Vollman DE, et al. American Society of Anesthesiologists classification in cataract surgery: Results from the Ophthalmic Surgery Outcomes Data Project. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(7):972-82.

  9. Hirooka K, Sato S, Nitta E, Tsujikawa A. The relationship between vision-related quality of life and visual function in glaucoma patients. J Glauc. 2016;25(6):505-9.

  10. Chatziralli IP, Sergentanis TN, Parikakis EA, Papazisis LE, Mitropoulos P, Moschos MM. The impact of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents after phacoemulsification on quality of life: a randomized study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2017;6(1):133-40.

  11. Cárdenas T, Monteagudo K, Guerra M, Cruz D, Mariño O. Lentes fáquicas para la corrección de ametropías. Antecedentes y actualidad. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2019 [acceso: 12/05/2020];31(2). Disponible en: http://www.revoftalmologia.sld.cu/index.php/oftalmologia/article/view/609

  12. Cárdenas T, Li F, Guerra M, Mariño O, Francisco Y, Sánchez L. Efecto de la lente fáquica ACR-128 sobre tensión ocular y endotelio corneal en altas miopías. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2019; [acceso: 12/05/2020];32(2). Disponible en: http://revoftalmologia.sld.cu/index.php/oftalmologia/article/view/61

  13. Yan Z, Miao H, Zhao F, Wang X, Chen X, Li M, Zhou X. Two-Year outcomes of visian implantable collamer lens with a central hole for correcting high myopia. J Ophthalmol. 2018;2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8678352

  14. Ayaka I, Kimiya Sh, Mayumi Y, Hidenaga K, Akihito I, Kazutaka K. Assessment of subjective intraocular forward scattering and quality of vision after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central hole (Hole ICL) implantation. Act Ophthalmol. 2016:94:716-20.

  15. Lane SS, Waycaster C. Correction of high myopia with a phakic intraocular lens: interim analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(8):1426-33.

  16. Haiting C, Yu L, Xueyan F, Guangzeng N, Yuxiang F. Long-term clinical observation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in young population. Eye Cont Lens. 2018;44(Suppl. 2):365-9.

  17. Rizk IM, Al-Hessy AA, El-Khouly SE, Sewelam AM. Visual performance after implantation of two types of phakic foldable intraocular lenses for correction of high myopia. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;12(2):284-90.

  18. Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Blanes-Mompó FJ, García-Lázaro S, Piñero DP, Cerviño A, Brautaset R. Visual and optical performance and quality of life after implantation of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(1):331-40.

  19. Sanders DR. Anterior subcapsular opacities and cataracts 5 years after surgery in the visian implantable collamer lens FDA trial. J Refract Surg. 2008;24(6):566-70.

  20. Lackner B, Pieh S, Schmidinger G, Hanselmayer G, Dejaco-Ruhswurm I, Funovics MA, Skorpik C. Outcome after treatment of ametropia with implantable contact lenses. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(11):2153-61.

  21. Menezo JL, Peris-Martínez C, Cisneros AL, Martínez-Costa R. Phakic intraocular lenses to correct high myopia: Adatomed, Staar, and Artisan. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(1):33-44.

  22. Hassaballa MA, Macky TA. Phakic intraocular lenses outcomes and complications: Artisan vs. Visian ICL. Eye. 2011;25(10):1365-70.

  23. Martínez-Plaza E, López-Miguel A, Fernández I, Blázquez-Arauzo F, Maldonado MJ. Effect of central hole location in phakic intraocular lenses on visual function under progressive head light glare sources. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(11):1591-6.

  24. Awadein A, Habib AE. ICL versus Veriflex phakic IOL for treatment of moderately high myopia: randomized paired-eye comparison. J Refract Surg. 2013;29(7):445-52.

  25. Boxer Wachler BS, Scruggs RT, Yuen LH, Jalali S. Comparison of the Visian ICL and Verisyse phakic intraocular lenses for myopia from 6,00 to 20,00 diopters. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(9):765-70.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com