2021, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Ortho-tips 2021; 17 (4)
Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty, functional results
Matehuala GJ, Pérez AJM, Villarreal BFJ, Ramos GMQ
Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 206-210
PDF size: 207.98 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Total knee replacement is generally a successful surgery with a low incidence of complications, despite this 20% of patients are not satisfied with the clinical result, probably related to the surgical approach, for this reason we look for less aggressive options for the placement of the prosthesis. Medial parapatellar capsulotomy per se is traumatic, therefore, a viable alternative is to incise through the muscular intervals, and the subvastous approach is the epitome of this decision.
Material and methods: The objective of this study was to evaluate the functional results of the subvastous vs medial parapetellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. 64 patients with a diagnosis of primary knee osteoarthritis were included. The patients were evaluated with the Knee Society Score at four weeks and six months.
Results: Of the total of 64 patients included in the study, they were divided into two groups. Patients underwent the medial parapatellar approach (group I) with 32 patients and the subvastus approach (group II) with 32 patients. The results showed better evolution in the first four weeks with the subvastus approach, but after the six-month revision the results were very similar.
Conclusions: The subvastous approach offers a better initial range of motion and less pain in the first weeks, however the results are similar when compared to the medial parapatellar approach in the medium term.
REFERENCES
Niemelalnen MJ, MaKela KT, Robertsson O, W-Dahl A, Furnes O, Fenstad AM, et al. Different incidences of knee arthroplasty in the Nordic countries. Acta Orthop. 2017; 88 (2): 173-178.
Scott CE, Howie CR, MacDonald D, Biant LC. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92 (9): 1253-1258.
Sastre S, Sanchez MD, Lozano L, Orient F, Fontg F, Nuñez M. Total knee arthroplasty: better short-term results after subvastus approach: a randomized, controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17 (10): 1184-1188.
Scuderi GR, Tenholder M, Capeci C. Surgical approaches in mini-incision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (428): 61-67.
Weinhardt C, Barisic M, Bergmann EG, Heller KD. Early results of subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004; 124 (6): 401-403.
Cila E, Güzel V, Ozalay M, Tan J, Simsek SA, Kanatli U, et al. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002; 122 (2): 65-68.
Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE. Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991; (269): 70-77.
Berstock JR, Murray JR, Whitehouse MR, Blom AW, Beswick AD. Medial subvastus versus the medial parapatellar approach for total knee replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. EFORT Open Rev. 2018; 3 (3): 78-84.
Hubbard JK, Sampson HW, Elledge JR. Prevalence and morphology of the vastus medialis oblique muscle in human cadavers. Anat Rec. 1997; 249 (1): 135-142.
Scapinelli R. Blood supply of the human patella. Its relation to ischaemic necrosis after fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1967; 49 (3): 563-570.
DeBell H, Pinter Z, Pinto M, Bergstresser S, Lee S, de Cesar Netto C, et al. Vascular supply at risk during lateral release of the patella during total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019; 10 (1): 107-110.
Kirschner MH, Menck J, Nerlich A, Walser R, Bühren V, Hofmann GO. The arterial blood supply of the human patella. Its clinical importance for the operating technique in vascularized knee joint transplantations. Surg Radiol Anat. 1997;19 (6): 345-351.
Arthur JR, Spangehl MJ. Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2019; 32 (8): 719-729.