2020, Number 3
APACHE II as predictor of mortality in an intensive care unit
Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 1-17
PDF size: 335.47 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) is the score system of severity illness more commonly used on Intensive Care Unit around the world.Objective: To describe the behavior of the Death rate using as predictor instrument the score system APACHE II.
Methods: A descriptive, prospective, longitudinal study was performed between November 2017 and November 2018 using the APACHE II score from 24 hours after the patient was admitted into the Intensive Care Unit of the Salvador Allende Hospital, Cerro, Havana, Cuba. The population corresponded with 551 cases. Analyzed variables were: age, sex, hospital stay, outcome status, APACHE II, profiles and diagnostics categories. The results were shown in absolute and relative frequencies, percentages and dispersion measures. It was performed the coefficient of Pearson´s correlation for determine the magnitude of association of quantitative variables.
Results: The average age was 62,26 years. The male sex predominated. 23,6% of the sample died, while the average of hospital stay was 4,16 days. Clinical profile donated 87,7% of deaths. The APACHE II medium was 12,82 points, and the quartile of 25-29 contributed with the mayor quantities of deceased.
Conclusions: Global mortality was relatively low, with the male sex being the predominant and also the one with the highest number of deaths, mainly due to respiratory diseases. In the APACHE II score, there was a tendency to increase real mortality in accordance with highest score range.
REFERENCES
Ministerio de Salud Pública. Dirección de Registros médicos y estadísticas de Salud. Anuario estadístico de salud 2019. 48 ed. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2020. [citado: 29/05/2020]. Disponible en: http://files.sld.cu/bvscuba/files/2020/05/Anuario-Electr%C3%B3nico-Espa%C3%B1ol-2019-ed-2020.pdf
Godinjak A, Iglica A, Rama A, Tancica I, Jusufovic S, Ajanovic A, et al. Predictive value of SAPS II and APACHE II scoring systems for patient outcome in a medical intensive care unit. Acta Médica Académica. 2016 [citado: 29/05/2020];45(2):97-103. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/28000485
Eason Y, Ms K, Mk R, As A. Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation IV (APACHE IV) severity of illness scoring systems, in a multidisciplinary ICU. Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology. 2017 [citado: 29/05/2020];33(2):248-53. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/28781454
Rocchetti NS, Bagilet DH, Settecase CJ, Quaglino M. Desempeño de los puntajes APACHE II y SAPS II para calcularla razón de mortalidad estandarizada en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos polivalente de la Argentina. Revista de Medicina Intensiva. 2016 [citado: 29/05/2020];33(1):1-8. Disponible en: https://revista.sati.org.ar/index.php/MI/article/view/437
Saleh A, Ahmed M, Sultan I, Abdel-lateif A. Comparison of the mortality prediction of different ICU scoring systems (APACHE II and III, SAPS II, and SOFA) in a single-center ICU subpopulation with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis. 2015 [citado: 29/05/2020];64:843-8. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S042276381530025X
Sedlon P, Kameník L, Skvaril J, Malý M, Táborský M, Zavoral M. Comparison of the accuracy and correctness of mortality estimates for Intensive Care Unit patients in internal clinics of the Czech Republic using APACHE II, APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPM lll models. Medicinski Glasnik. 2016 [citado: 29/05/2020];13(2):82-9. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/27452324
Xiao YZ, Su QB, Hong LC, Song SN. A comparison of APACHE II and CPIS scores for the prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with ventilator associated pneumonia. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2015 [citado: 29/05/2020 May 29];30:144-7. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/25461659
Ruiz C, Díaz MÁ, Zapata JM, Bravo S, Panay S, Escobar C, et al. Características y evolución de los pacientes que ingresan a una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de un hospital público. Revista Médica de Chile. 2016 [citado: 29/05/2020];144:1297-304. Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872016001000009
Nematifard E, Hossein S, Shahbazi S, Eini-zinab H, Vahdat Z. Combination of APACHE Scoring Systems with Adductor Pollicis Muscle Thickness for the Prediction of Mortality in Patients Who Spend More Than One Day in the Intensive Care Unit. Critical Care Research and Practice. 2018 [citado: 29/05/2020];2018:1-6. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/25137401
Parajuli BD, Shrestha GS, Pradhan B, Amatya R. Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation IV to predict intensive care unit mortality. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015 [citado: 29/05/2020];19(2):87-91. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339910/
Sakr Y, Elia C, Mascia L, Barberis B, Cardellino S, Livigni S, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of sepsis syndromes in Italian ICUs: a muticentre, observational cohort study in the region of Piedmont. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 [citado: 29/05/2020];79(9):993-1002. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/23811620