medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-462X (Print)
Organo de divulgación Científica de la Unidad Académica de Odontología de la Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit (UAN)

2020, Number 24

<< Back Next >>

Rev Tame 2020; 8.9 (24)

Evaluación de la fuerza de adhesión de brackets reacondicionados por el método de arenado, térmico y mixto

González-Luna PIV, Díaz PE, Beltrán RPR, Hernández MC, García AA, Jimenez VJ

Language: Spanish
References: 36
Page: 964-970
PDF size: 465.45 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine the level of knowledge and attitudes of pediatricians to decay in early childhood, observational, descriptive and correlational cross-sectional study. A total of 100 pediatricians surveyed, the data were processed using Microsoft Excel XP and SPSS 13.0. Of those surveyed pediatricians, more than half were women and the age range where he found the highest percentage was 46 to 50 years. Good knowledge level was 62%, and the positive attitude occupies 86%. The highest percentage of pediatricians had more than 6 years of professional practice. A statistically significant relationship in the knowledge and attitudes of pediatricians to first childhood caries chi square = 17,324, P = 0.004 and a significant correlation, rs = 0.5 (P = 0.0003, n = 100) was confirmed. It is concluded among other things, establish a program of prevention of dental caries and the correct bottle use where pediatricians involve parents, to acquire food hygiene and to preserve the oral health of the infant.


REFERENCES

  1. Moyers R. Manual de ortodoncia. 4 ed., Buenos Aires, Panamericana, 1992. Capítulo 1 y 9, Pags. 3,306.

  2. Sunna S, Rock WP. Effect of sandblasting on the retention of orthodontic brackets: a controlled clinical trial. J Orthod 2008; 35: 43-48.

  3. Reynolds IR, Von Fraunhofer JA. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Brit J Orthod. 1975;2:143-6.

  4. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. Journal of Dental Research. 1955; 34:849–53.

  5. Bowen RL, Rodríguez MS. Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure: several restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1962; 64: 378-87.

  6. Basudan AM, Al-Emran SE. The effects of in-office reconditioning on the morphology of slots and bases of stainless steel brackets and on the shear/peel bond strength. J Orthod. 2001; 28: 231-6.

  7. Maccoll GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and base surface area using conventional and micro-etched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 109: 338-9.

  8. Tavares S, Consani S, Moure D, Magana M, Moure P, Martins L. Shear bond strength of new and recycled brackets on enamel. Braz Dent J. 2006;17:44-8.

  9. Postlethwaite K. Recycling bands and brackets. Br J Orthod. 1992; 19: 157-63.

  10. Leas TJ, Hondrum S. The effects of rebonding on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. A comparision of two clinical techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 103:200-1.

  11. Jacobson A. The effects of in-of reconditioning on the morphology of slots and bases of stainless steel brackets and on the shear/peel bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:433.

  12. Buchman D. Effects of recycling on metallic direct bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1980;19:157- 63.

  13. Quick AN, Harris M, Joseph VP. Of ce reconditioning of stainless steel orthodontic attachments. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:231–236. Luque HJ, Pérez LF, Carhuamaca GJ, Coronado MA. Fuerza de adhesión de brackets reacondicionados con diferentes técnicas adheridos repetidas veces en la misma super cie del esmalte. Odontol. Sanmarquina 2008;11(2):60-65.

  14. Luque HJ, Pérez LF, Carhuamaca GJ, Coronado MA. Fuerza de adhesión de brackets reacondicionados con diferentes técnicas adheridos repetidas veces en la misma super cie del esmalte. Odontol. Sanmarquina 2008;11(2):60-65.

  15. Regan D, Van Noort R, O'Keefe C. The effects of recycling on the tensile bond strength of new and clinically used stainless steel orthodontic brackets: an in vivo study. Br J Orthod 1990;17(2):137-45.

  16. Ozer M, Arici S. Sandblasted metal brackets bonded with resin modi ed glass ionomer cement in vivo. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:406-9.

  17. Tavares SW, Consani S, Nouer DF, Magnani MBBA, Pereira Neto JS, Romano FL. Evaluation in vitro of the shear bond strength of aluminum oxide recycled brackets. Braz J Oral Sci. 2003; 7: 378-81.

  18. Sonis AL. Air abrasion of failed bonded metal brackets: A study of shear bond strength and surface characteristics as determined by scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;110:96-8.

  19. Powers, J. M. Semin Orthod. 1997; 3: 147-156.

  20. Gómez de Ferraris ME, Campos Muñoz A. Histología, Embriología e Ingeniería tisular Bucodental, Editorial Medica Panamericana, 3ª edición, capitulo 12, 2009. páginas. 292-296.

  21. Rodríguez Yáñez EE, Casasa Araujo R., 2005, Ortodoncia Contemporánea, Diagnóstico y tratamiento, Editorial Amolca, capítulo 4.

  22. Bishara S.E., Ortodoncia, Editorial McGraw Hill, capitulo 14.

  23. Espinar Escalona E., Mejora de la fijación del bracket al diente mediante la optimización de la rugosidad de la superficie de contacto del metal al diente, Tesis Doctoral, Sevilla 2005, páginas 14-16.

  24. Matasa CG. Orthodontic recycling at the crossroads. J. Clin. Orthod. 2003;37:133-139.

  25. Burbano de Ercilla S, Gracia Muñoz C. Física general, Editorial Tebar, 2003. página 100.

  26. Anusavice J.K., 2004, Phillips; La ciencia de los materiales dentales, Editorial Elsevier, 11ª edición, página 78.

  27. Damon PL, Bishara S Effects of fluoride application on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets, The Angle Orthodontist, vol.66, no.1,1996, p.61-64.

  28. Sudhir S. A comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with four different orthodontic adhesives, J. Orthod. Sci, 2014, p. 29-33.

  29. Marchiori Farret M, The influence of methodological variables on the shear bond strength, Dental Press J. Orthod, 2010; 15 (1): 80-8.

  30. Venugopal A., Tejani H., Comparison of two different orthodontic bracket recycling techniques. Orthodontic Journal of Nepal. 2016; 6 (2): 28-32.

  31. García Pacheco C.A., Estudio in vitro de la resistencia a la tracción de tres tipos de resinas fotopolimerizables para ortodoncia, en brackets metálicos a esmalte dental humano, Tesis de grado, 2013, p. 1-78.

  32. Bishara S., VonWald L., The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of a composite resin orthodontic adhesive, The Angle Orthodontist. 2000;70 (6): 435-441.

  33. Bahnasi F. I., Abd-Rahman A., Effects of recycling and bonding agent application on bond strength of stainless Steel orthodontic brackets. J Clin Exp. Dent. 2013; 5(4): 197-202.

  34. Lunardi N, Hauber G. The effect of repeated bracket recycling on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives, Braz. J. Oral Science, Vol. 7, No. 27, p. 1648-1652.

  35. Sánchez Achío T., Estudio comparativo de la resistencia al desalojo en brackets nuevos, arenados y reciclados: Un estudio in vitro, ODOVTOS- International Journal of Dental Sciences.2015; 17 (3): 61-71.

  36. Ramírez S., Ochoa P., Bravo M. Eficacia de los métodos de reacondicionamiento de los brackets en relación a su resistencia a la tracción “estudio in vitro”. Revista Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia y Odontopediatría, 2016.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com