Lino-González AL, Arch-Tirado E, Castañeda-Maceda MV, Mercado-Hernández I, Velasco-Orozco MA

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 128-139
PDF size: 243.64 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Background: In Mexico in 2012, a prevalence of pediatric hearing loss of 1.4 per 1000 births was reported. Early diagnosis, medical follow-up and therapeutic treatment are essential for the optimal integral development of children with hearing loss, thus, the diagnosis before 6 months of age is promoted by means of a neonatal hearing screening.
Objective: To analyze and evaluate frequent behaviors for which hearing loss is identified in infants.
Materials and Methods:Descriptive cross-sectional study done in April 2019, in which relatives of patients with a diagnosis of hearing loss from a National Health Institute answered a questionnaire whose objective was to know the form and time of detection of hearing impairment. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, joint probability, conditional probability and χ².
Results: The modal variables were schooling, mother’s age, type of family nucleus, pregnancy number, absence of communicative intention, age at diagnosis by audiological test and auditory perception capacity. The determining behavioral factor for detection was the absence of communicative intention after 12 months of age.
Conclusions: It is necessary to develop campaigns aimed at parents based on behaviors for which hearing loss should be suspected. A relative efficiency of the neonatal hearing screen is perceived in Mexico.

REFERENCES

1. Secretaría de Salud. Para oír desde el principio. México, http://www.spps.gob.mx/avisos/1019-programa-tamizauditivo- neonatal-e-intervencion-temprana-tanit.html: 2014 [consultado 14.10.3].

2. Secretaría de Salud. Tamiz metabólico neonatal y auditivo. México, http://www.gob.mx/salud/articulos/tamiz-metabolico- neonatal-y-auditivo: 2015 [consultado 22.12.20].

3. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Las personas con discapacidad en México, una visión al 2010. México, http://internet.contenidos.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/productos/ prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/ censos/poblacion/2010/discapacidad/702825051785.pdf: 2013 [consultado 11.12.20] 2017 abr 11].

4. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. La discapacidad en México, datos al 2014. México, http://internet. contenidos.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/productos/prod_ serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/nueva_estruc/ 702825090203.pdf}: 2016 [consultado11.12.20].

5. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Estadísticas a propósito del día del niño. Datos Nacionales. México, https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/aproposito/ 2020/EAP_Nino.pdf: 2020 [consultado22.12.2020].

6. Pérez-Abalo MC, Gaya JA, Savío G, Ponce de León M, et al. Diagnóstico e intervención temprana de los trastornos de la audición; una experiencia cubana de 20 años. Rev Neurol 2005; 41: 556-63.

7. Olusnaya BO, Akinyemi OO. Community-based infant hearing screening in a developing country: parental uptake of follow-up services. BMC Public Health 2009; 9: 1-10.

8. Gaffney M, Green DR, Gaffney C. Newborn hearing screening and follow-up: are children receiving recommended services? Public Health Rep 2010; 125: 199-207. doi. 10.1177/003335491012500208.

9. Nazar G, Goycoolea M, Godoy JM, Ried E, et al. Evaluación auditiva neonatal universal: revisión de 10.000 pacientes estudiados. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello 2009; 69: 93-102.

10. Borkoski-Barreiro SA, Falcón-González JC, Bueno-Yanes J, Pérez-Bermudez JL, et al. Results of an early hearing detection program. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2013; 64: 92-6. doi. 10.1016/j.otoeng.2013.04.003.

11. Baltussen R, Li J, Wu LD, Ge XH, et al. Costs of screening children for hearing disorders and delivery of hearing aids in China. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9: 1-7.

12. Green D, Gaffney M, Devine O, Grosse S. Determining the effect of newborn hearing screening legislation: an analysis of state hearing screening rates. Public Health Rep 2007; 122: 198-205. doi. 10.1177/003335490712200209.

13. Trinidad-Ramos G, Alzina de Aguilar V, Jaudenes-Casaubón C, Nuñez-Batalla F, et al. Early hearing detection and intervention: 2010 CODEPEH recommendation. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2010; 61: 69-77. doi. 10.1016/j. otorri.2009.09.008.

14. Cardemil F. Aspectos éticos en el tamizaje de hipoacusia neonatal en Chile. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello 2012; 72: 249-260.

15. Cañete O, Torrente M. Evaluación del programa de detección precoz de hipoacusia en recién nacidos prematuros (RNPE), experiencia Hospital Padre Hurtado. Rev Otorrinolaringol Cir Cabeza Cuello 2011; 71: 117-122.

16. Young A, Tattersall H. Universal newborn hearing and early identification of deafness parents responses to knowing early and their expectations of child communication development. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2007; 12: 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enl033.

17. González-González LO, Pérez-González VM, Ospina-Rodríguez JP. Clínica de tamiz auditivo en el Instituto Nacional de Pediatría. Acta Pediatr Mex 2012; 33: 20-25.

18. Secretaría de Salud. Programa de acción específico 2007- 2012. Tamiz auditivo neonatal e intervención temprana. México, D.F. 2009.

19. Sistema de protección social en salud. Informe de resultados 2013. México, D.F. 2013.

20. Ferrerira R, Basile L, Munyo A, Añazo G. Emisiones otoacústicas en recién nacidos con factores de riesgo auditivo. Arch Pediatr Urug 2003; 74: 197-202.

21. Peñaranda A, Mendieta JC, Perdomo JA, Aparicio ML, et al. Beneficios económicos del implante coclear para la hipoacusia sensorineural profunda. Rev Panam Salud Pública 2012; 31: 325-31.

22. González L, Fernández JM, Torres MI. Current status of the programs for detection of hearing loss in children younger than six months in Cali. Colomb Med 2012; 43: 73-81.