medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Impreso)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2021, Número 1

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2021; 23 (1)


Resistencia adhesiva microtensil entre cementos de resina autoadhesivos y bloques de cerámica CAD/CAM a base de resina

Berkman M, Tuncer S, Tekçe N, Karabay F, Demirci M

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 39
Paginas: 116-125
Archivo PDF: 311.10 Kb.


RESUMEN

Propósito: Evaluar y comparar la resistencia adhesiva microtensil (μTBS) de cuatro cementos de resina autoadhesivos diferentes con un bloque CAD / CAM de cerámica a base de resina, antes y después de 5.000 ciclos de termociclado. Materiales y métodos: cuatro cementos de resina de doble curado autoadhesivos; G-CEM LinkAce (GC EUROPE, Lovaina, Bélgica), RelyX U200 (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Alemania), Maxcem Elite (Kerr, CA, EE. UU.), TheraCem (Bisco, Schaumburg, EE. UU.) fueron aplicados a bloques Cerasmart CAD/CAM (GC EUROPE, Lovaina, Bélgica). Los bloques CAD/CAM se seccionaron en barras y se sometieron a pruebas µTBS a las 24 horas, y la otra mitad se sometió a pruebas después de 5000 ciclos térmicos. Los datos fueron probados por análisis de varianza unidireccional (p‹0.05). Resultados: Los valores más altos de fuerza de unión se observaron en TheraCem, seguido de G-CEM LinkAce y RelyX U200, respectivamente (p‹0.05). En la línea de base, G-CEM LinkAce, RelyX U200, Maxcem Elite mostró resultados estadísticamente similares. Después de 5.000 procesos de ciclo térmico, se observó una disminución significativa en los valores de resistencia de la unión de G-CEM LinkAce (p‹0.05). Conclusión: entre los cementos adhesivos utilizados en el estudio, TheraCem mostró los valores más altos de resistencia de la unión micro-extensible tanto en la línea de base (24 h) como después de 5,000 procedimientos de envejecimiento térmico.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. O’Brien W.J. Dental Materials and Their Selection. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc.; 2002.

  2. Pegoraro T.A., da Silva N.R., Carvalho R.M. Cements for use in esthetic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51 (2): 453-71.

  3. Sunico-Segarra M.S., Armin. A Practical Clinical Guide to Resin Cements. Berlin: Springer; 2015.

  4. Sakaguchi R.L., Powers J.M. Craig's restorative dental materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012.

  5. Manso A. P., Carvalho R. M. Dental Cements for Luting and Bonding Restorations: Self-Adhesive Resin Cements. Dent Clin North Am. 2017; 61 (4): 821-34.

  6. Ferracane J. L., Stansbury J. W., Burke F. J. Self-adhesive resin cements- chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38 (4): 295-314.

  7. Pilo R., Papadogiannis D., Zinelis S., Eliades G. Setting characteristics and mechanical properties of self-adhesive resin luting agents. Dent Mater. 2017; 33 (3): 344-57.

  8. Zorzin J., Petschelt A., Ebert J., Lohbauer U. pH neutralization and influence on mechanical strength in self-adhesive resin luting agents. Dental Materials. 2012; 28 (6): 672-9.

  9. Marghalani H.Y. Sorption and solubility characteristics of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater. 2012; 28 (10): e187-98.

  10. Yin R., Kim Y.K., Jang Y.S., Lee J.J., Lee M.H., Bae T.S. Comparative evaluation of the mechanical properties of CAD/CAM dental blocks. Odontology. 2019; 107 (3): 360-7.

  11. Lauvahutanon S., Takahashi H., Shiozawa M., Iwasaki N., Asakawa Y., Oki M., et al. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J. 2014; 33 (5): 705-10.

  12. Blatz M. B., Conejo J. The Current State of Chairside Digital Dentistry and Materials. Dent Clin North Am. 2019; 63 (2): 175-97.

  13. Gurdal I., Atay A., Eichberger M., Cal E., Usumez A., Stawarczyk B. Color change of CAD-CAM materials and composite resin cements after thermocycling. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120 (4): 546-52.

  14. Lambert H., Durand J.C., Jacquot B., Fages M. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/ CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont. 2017; 9 (6): 486-95.

  15. Stawarczyk B., Sener B., Trottmann A., Roos M., Ozcan M., Hammerle C.H. Discoloration of manually fabricated resins and industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versus glassceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J. 2012; 31 (3): 377-83.

  16. Spitznagel F. A., Horvath S. D., Guess P. C., Blatz M. B. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014; 26 (6): 382-93.

  17. Fuentes M., Escribano N., Baracco B., Romero M., Ceballos L. Effect of indirect composite treatment microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2015:0-.

  18. Seghi R. R., Leyva Del Rio D. Biomaterials: Ceramic and Adhesive Technologies. Dent Clin North Am. 2019; 63 (2):233-48.

  19. Horvath S.D. Key Parameters of Hybrid Materials for CAD/CAM-Based Restorative Dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2016; 37 (9): 638-43.

  20. Elsaka S.E. Bond strength of novel CAD/ CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent. 2014; 16 (6): 531-40.

  21. Emsermann I., Eggmann F., Krastl G., Weiger R., Amato J. Influence of Pretreatment Methods on the Adhesion of Composite and Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic CAD-CAM Blocks. J Adhes Dent. 2019; 21 (5): 433-43.

  22. Higashi M., Matsumoto M., Kawaguchi A., Miura J., Minamino T., Kabetani T., et al. Bonding effectiveness of self-adhesive and conventional-type adhesive resin cements to CAD/CAM resin blocks. Part 1: Effects of sandblasting and silanization. Dent Mater J. 2016; 35 (1): 21-8.

  23. Peumans M., Valjakova E.B., De Munck J., Mishevska C.B., Van Meerbeek B. Bonding Effectiveness of Luting Composites to Different CAD/CAM Materials. J Adhes Dent. 2016; 18 (4): 289-302.

  24. Lise D. P., Van Ende A., De Munck J., Vieira L., Baratieri L.N., Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite Cement to Novel CAD/CAM Materials as a Function of Surface Treatment and Aging. Oper Dent. 2017; 42 (1): 73-81.

  25. da Silva E.M., Miragaya L., Sabrosa C.E., Maia L.C. Stability of the bond between two resin cements and an yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramic after six months of aging in water. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112 (3): 568-75.

  26. Van Landuyt K.L., Snauwaert J., De Munck J., Peumans M., Yoshida Y., Poitevin A., et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007; 28 (26): 3757-85.

  27. Yoshihara K., Yoshida Y., Nagaoka N., Fukegawa D., Hayakawa S., Mine A., et al. Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater. 2010; 6 (9): 3573-82.

  28. Lee K-S, Shin M-S, Lee J-Y, Ryu J-J, Shin S-W. Shear bond strength of composite resin to high performance polymer PEKK according to surface treatments and bonding materials. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2017; 9 (5): 350.

  29. Han L., Okamoto A., Fukushima M., Okiji T. Evaluation of physical properties and surface degradation of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater J. 2007; 26 (6): 906-14.

  30. Tekce N., Tuncer S., Demirci M., Kara D., Baydemir C. Microtensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin Blocks to Dual-Cure Adhesive Cement: The Effect of Different Sandblasting Procedures. J Prosthodont. 2019; 28 (2): e485-e90.

  31. Ferrari M., Carvalho C. A., Goracci C., Antoniolli F., Mazzoni A., Mazzotti G., et al. Influence of luting material filler content on post cementation. J Dent Res. 2009; 88 (10): 951-6.

  32. Chen L., Yang J., Wang J.R., Suh B.I. Physical and biological properties of a newly developed calcium silicate-based self-adhesive cement. Am J Dent. 2018; 31 (2): 86-90.

  33. Mazzitelli C., Monticelli F., Osorio R., Casucci A., Toledano M., Ferrari M. Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on self-adhesive cements bonding to dentin. Dent Mater. 2008; 24 (9): 1156-63.

  34. Fuentes M.V., Escribano N., Baracco B., Romero M., Ceballos L.. Effect of indirect composite treatment microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016; 8 (1): e14-21.

  35. Sokolowski G., Szczesio A., Bociong K., Kaluzinska K., Lapinska B., Sokolowski J., et al. Dental Resin Cements-The Influence of Water Sorption on Contraction Stress Changes and Hydroscopic Expansion. Materials (Basel). 2018; 11 (6).

  36. Kim H. J., Bagheri R., Kim Y.K., Son J.S., Kwon T.Y. Influence of Curing Mode on the Surface Energy and Sorption/Solubility of Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements. Materials (Basel). 2017; 10 (2).

  37. Kim J.E., Kim J.H., Shim J.S., Roh B.D., Shin Y. Effect of Surface Treatment on Shear Bond Strength between Resin Cement and Ce-TZP/ Al2O3. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016: 7576942.

  38. Zorzin J., Belli R., Wagner A., Petschelt A., Lohbauer U. Self-adhesive resin cements: adhesive performance to indirect restorative ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 2014; 16 (6): 541-6.

  39. Ferracane J.L. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater. 2006; 22 (3): 211-22.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com