medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Impreso)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2020, Número 3

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev ADM 2020; 77 (3)


Consideraciones para el manejo de un implante inmediato en alvéolos infectados: una actualización.

Falcón-Guerrero BE, Falcón-Pasapera GS

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 25
Paginas: 156-161
Archivo PDF: 148.55 Kb.


RESUMEN

Introducción: La instalación inmediata del implante posterior a la extracción dental se está convirtiendo en un procedimiento de rutina debido a la reducción del tiempo de tratamiento y a la preservación de las estructuras anatómicas remanentes. Sin embargo, en muchos casos esta técnica involucra dientes afectados con procesos infecciosos. Hasta ahora, no se ha descrito a ciencia cierta el grado de éxito o fracaso del implante inmediato en alvéolos infectados, ni se ha establecido un protocolo para el manejo de este tipo de casos. Objetivo: Realizar una revisión bibliográfica actualizada, para determinar qué consideraciones se deben tener para instalar un implante inmediato en alvéolos con procesos infecciosos. Conclusión: Es posible obtener las ventajas de la instalación inmediata del implante en alvéolos infectados mediante la aplicación de un adecuado manejo clínico, donde se considere un adecuado tratamiento antibiótico, acompañado de un correcto curetaje alveolar, respetar la cadena de asepsia y antisepsia, posición subcrestal del implante y obtener siempre una buena estabilidad primaria del implante.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Chen H, Zhang G, Weigl P, Gu X. Immediate placement of dental implants into infected versus noninfected sites in the esthetic zone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 120 (5): 658-667.

  2. Zhao D, Wu Y, Xu C, Zhang F. Immediate dental implant placement into infected vs. non-infected sockets: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 27 (10): 1290-1296.

  3. de Oliveira-Neto OB, Barbosa FT, de Sousa-Rodrigues CF, de Lima FJC. Quality assessment of systematic reviews regarding immediate placement of dental implants into infected sites: an overview. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117 (5): 601-605.

  4. Jofre J, Valenzuela D, Quintana P, Asenjo-Lobos C. Protocol for Immediate Implant Replacement of Infected Teeth. Implant Dentistry. 2012; 21 (4): 287-294.

  5.  5. Laney WR. Glossary of oral and maxillofacial implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017; 32 (4): Gi-G200.

  6. Zuffetti F, Capelli M, Galli F, Del Fabbro M, Testori T. Post-extraction implant placement into infected versus non-infected sites: a multicenter retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 19 (5): 833-840.

  7. Gallucci GO, Hamilton A, Zhou W, Buser D, Chen S. Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018; 29 Suppl 16: 106-134.

  8. Hammerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; 19: 26-28.

  9. Levine RA, Ganeles J, Gonzaga L, Kan JK, Randel H, Evans CD et al. 10 keys for successful esthetic zone single immediate implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017; 38 (4): 248-260.

  10. Chappuis V, Araujo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73 (1): 73-83.

  11. Neugebauer J, Traini T, Thams U, Piattelli A, Zoller JE. Periimplant bone organization under immediate loading state. Circularly polarized light analyses: a minipig study. J Periodontol. 2006; 77 (2): 152-160.

  12. Jensen OT. Dental extraction, immediate placement of dental implants, and immediate function. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2015; 27 (2): 273-282.

  13. Testori T, Weinstein T, Scutellà F, Wang HL, Zucchelli G. Implant placement in the esthetic area: criteria for positioning single and multiple implants. Periodontol 2000. 2018; 77 (1): 176-196.

  14. Lee J, Park D, Koo KT, Seol YJ, Lee YM. Comparison of immediate implant placement in infected and non-infected extraction sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018; 76 (5): 338-345.

  15. Pal US, Daga D, Singh RK, Kumar L, Singh M. Comparison of stability with two-time use of platelet-rich growth factor versus one-time use of platelet-rich growth factor in immediate placement of dental implant in infected socket. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 9 (2): 209-214.

  16. Anitua E, Piñas L, Alkhraisat MH. Long-term outcomes of immediate implant placement into infected sockets in association with immediate loading: a retrospective cohort study. J Periodontol. 2016; 87 (10): 1135-1140.

  17. Manor Y, Alkasem A, Mardinger O, Chaushu G, Greenstein RB. Levels of bacterial contamination in fresh extraction sites after a saline rinse. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30: 1362-1368.

  18. S Medikeri R, Meharwade V, M Wate P, V Lele S. Effect of PRF and allograft use on immediate implants at extraction sockets with periapical infection -clinical and cone beam CT findings. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2018; 59 (2): 97-109.

  19. Crippa R, Aiuto R, Guardincerri M, Peñarrocha Diago M, Angiero F. Effect of laser radiation on infected sites for the immediate placement of dental implants. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020; 38 (3): 186-192.

  20. Lee J, Kim S, Koo KT, Seol YJ, Cho HJ, Lee YM. Histologic analyses of immediate implant placement in infected and noninfected sockets: an experimental pilot study in beagle dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019; 34 (3): 575-584.

  21. de Oliveira-Neto OB, Lemos CA, Barbosa FT, de Sousa-Rodrigues CF, Camello de Lima FJ. Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019; 24 (4): e518-e528.

  22. Calvo-Guirado JL, Romanos GE, Delgado-Ruiz RA. Infected tooth extraction, bone grafting, immediate implant placement and immediate temporary crown insertion in a patient with severe type-B hemophilia. BMJ Case Rep. 2019; 12 (3). pii: e229204.

  23. Alqutaibi AY. Limited evidence suggests that the immediate placement of dental implants into infected sites versus non-infected sites in the esthetic zone show comparable clinical results. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2019; 19 (2): 180-182.

  24. Givens E Jr, Bencharit S, Byrd WC, Phillips C, Hosseini B, Tyndall D. Immediate placement and provisionalization of implants into sites with periradicular infection with and without antibiotics: an exploratory study. J Oral Implantol. 2015; 41 (3): 299-305.

  25. Hosseini B, Byrd WC, Preisser JS, Khan A, Duggan D, Bencharit S. Effects of antibiotics on bone and soft-tissue healing following immediate single-tooth implant placement into sites with apical pathology. J Oral Implantol. 2015; 41 (5): e202-S211.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com