medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Impreso)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2018, Número 6

<< Anterior

Rev ADM 2018; 75 (6)


Monobond Etch & Prime, primer acondicionador monocomponente, que permite el grabado y la silanización de las superficies cerámicas en un solo paso

Cedillo VJJ, Solano GAC

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 87
Paginas: 358-369
Archivo PDF: 450.61 Kb.


RESUMEN

Las propiedades mecánicas de los materiales, han hecho que la técnica de cementación de las carillas sea tan cambiante y tan estudiada. Esta técnica ha sido modificada basados en investigaciones de diversos estudios clínicos. Lo cambiante de la técnica, no solamente es para el substrato del órgano dental, sino también para el material de la cerámica elegida. Esto confunde al clínico al estar modificando los procedimientos de cementación. En años recientes, como resultado del rápido progreso en la tecnología CAD/CAM, existe una gran cantidad de nuevas cerámicas y materiales híbridos en el mercado odontológico, esto se refleja en beneficios para los pacientes, al poder seleccionar distintas clases de materiales restaurativos. A su vez, las indicaciones se han expandido, esto hace que se incremente la dificultad para los clínicos y ceramistas para mantenerse actualizados en la selección del material, lo que es más importante en los protocolos correctos de adhesión para el tratamiento en distintas superficies. En este artículo, se presenta el reporte de un caso clínico a nueve meses de seguimiento con la finalidad de evaluar la eficacia del nuevo acondicionador monocomponente, para grabar y silanizar en un solo paso para Disilicato de Litio (DL), el nuevo Monobond Etch & Prime (MBEP) en el mismo frasco contiene la cantidad suficiente de ácido acondicionador y silano. Esto simplifica los procedimientos de adhesión, reduciendo no sólo el número de pasos, sino también el tiempo de trabajo.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. De Rábago-Vega J, Tello-Rodríguez AI. Carillas de porcelana como solución estética en dientes anteriores: informe de doce casos. RCOE. 2005; 10 (3): 273-282.

  2. Pincus CL. Building mouth personality. J Calif Dent Ass. 1938; 14 (4): 125-129.

  3. Buonocuore MA. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic fillings to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955; 34: 849-853.

  4. Rochette AL. A ceramic restoration bonded by etched enamel and resin for fractured incisors. J Prosthet Dent. 1975; 33 (3): 287-293.

  5. Calamia JR. Etched porcelain facial veneers: a new treatment modality based on scientific and clinical evidence. NYJ Dent. 1983; 53: 255-259.

  6. Touati B, Miara P, Nathanson D. Carillas de porcelana. En: Odontología estética y restauraciones cerámicas. Cap 9, Barcelona: Ed. Masson, 1998, pp. 161-213.

  7. Peña LJ, Fernández VJ, Álvarez FM, González LP. Técnica y sistemática clínica de la preparación y construcción de carillas de porcelana. RCOE. 2003; 8 (6): 647-668.

  8. Mörig G. Aesthetic all-ceramic restoration: a philosophyc and clinical review. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2003; Suppl: 19-26.

  9. Chu SJ, Ahmad I. Light dynamic properties of a synthetic low-fusing quartz glass ceramic material. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2003; 15: 49-56.

  10. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Van Ehrle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2000; 28: 163-167.

  11. Cho GC, Donovan TE, Chee WW. Clinical experiences with bonded porcelain laminate veneers. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1998; 26: 121-127.

  12. Walls AW, Steele JG, Wassell RW. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: porcelain laminate veneers. Br Dent J. 2002; 193: 79-82.

  13. Aristidis GA, Dimitra B. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain laminated veneers. Quintessence Int. 2002; 33: 185-189.

  14. Ascheim KW, Dale B. Odontología estética. 2a. ed. Madrid: Ed. Harcourt, 2002.

  15. Hooshmand T, Parvizi S, Keshvad A. Effect of surface acid etching on the biaxial flexural strength of two hot-pressed glass ceramics. J Prosthodont. 2008; 17: 415-419.

  16. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent. 1998; 23: 250-257.

  17. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of different etching periods on the bond strength of a composite resin to a machinable porcelain. J Dent. 1998; 26: 53-58.

  18. Jardel V, Degrange M, Picard B, Derrien G. Surface energy of etched ceramic. Int J Prosthodont. 1999; 12: 415-418.

  19. Yen TW, Blackman RB, Baez RJ. Effect of acid etching on the flexural strength of a feldspathic porcelain and a castable glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 70: 224-233.

  20. Addison O, Marquis PM, Fleming GJ. The impact of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on the performance of a porcelain laminate restorative material. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 461-468.

  21. Chang JC, Hart DA, Estey AW, Chan JT. Tensile bond strenghts of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90: 18-23.

  22. Guzmán TJ, González BH, Salgado MM. Influencia del tiempo de tratamiento de superficie con ácido fluorhídrico de la porcelana VITA VM 13, en la resistencia de unión a cemento de resina frente a fuerzas de tracción. Estudio in vitro. Rev Clin Periodoncia Implantol Rehabil Oral Vol. 2012; 5 (3): 117-122.

  23. El-Mowafy O. The use of resin cements in restorative dentistry, to overcome retention problems. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001; 67: 97-102.

  24. Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Avera SP. Porcelain-composite interface microleakagewith various porcelain surface treatments. Dent Mat. 1991; 7: 118-123.

  25. McLean JW, Hughes TH. The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides. Br Dent J. 1965; 119: 251-267.

  26. Seghi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength, of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont. 1995; 8: 239-246.

  27. Andersson M, Oden A. A new all-ceramic crown: A dense-sintered, high-purity alumina coping with porcelain. Acta Odontol Scand. 1993; 51: 59-64.

  28. Zeng K, Oden A, Rowcliffe D. Flexure tests on dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont. 1996; 9: 434-439.

  29. Zeng K, Oden A, Rowcliffe D. Evaluation of mechanical properties of dental ceramic core materials in combination with porcelains. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11: 183-189.

  30. Ashizuka M, Kiyohara H, Okuno T, Kubota Y. Fatigue behavior of tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP) containing 2 and 4 mol% Y2O3 (Part 2). J Ceram Soc Jpn Inter Ed. 1988; 96: 731-736.

  31. Taira M, Nomura Y, Wakasa K, Yamaki M, Matsui A. Studies on fracture toughness of dental ceramics. J Oral Rehabil. 1990; 17: 551-563.

  32. Giordano RA 2nd, Pelletier L, Campbell S, Pober R. Flexural strength, of an infused ceramic, glass ceramic, and feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1995; 73: 411-418.

  33. Roulet JF, Soderholm KJM, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strenght. J Dent Res. 1995; 74: 381-387.

  34. Janda R, Roulet JF, Wulf M, Tiller HJ. A new adhesive technology for all-ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 567-573.

  35. Fabianelli A, Pollington S, Papacchini F, Goracci C, Cantoro A, Ferrari M et al. The effect of different surface treatments on bond strength between leucite reinforced feldspathic ceramic and composite resin. J Dent. 2010; 38: 39-43.

  36. Canay S, Hersek N, Ertan A. Effect of different acid treatments on a porcelain surface. J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28: 95-101.

  37. Santos GC Jr, Santos MJ, Rizkalla AS. Adhesive cementation of etchable ceramic esthetic restorations. J Can Dent Assoc. 2009; 75: 379-384.

  38. Bailey LF, Bennett RJ. DICOR surface treatments for enhanced bonding. J Dent Res. 1988; 67: 925-931.

  39. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 268-274.

  40. Belli R, Guimaraes JC, Filho AM, Vieira LC. Post-etching cleaning and resin/ceramic bonding: microtensile bond strength and EDX analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2010; 12: 295-303.

  41. Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89: 268-274.

  42. Zortuk M, Kilic K, Gurbulak AG, Kesim B, Uctasli S. Tensile bond strength of a lithium-disilicate pressed glass ceramic to dentin of different surface treatments. Dent Mater J. 2010; 29 (4): 418-424.

  43. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Mecholsky JJ Jr. Failure analysis of resin composite bonded to ceramic. Dent Mater. 2003; 19 (8): 693-699.

  44. Caparroso CB, Latorre F, Arroyave LJ, Grajales CA. In vitro evaluation of the effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration and application time on adhesion to lithium disilicate. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2014; 26 (1): 62-75.

  45. Doyle PJ. Acid polishing of lead glass. Brit Glass Ind Res Ass. 1970; pp. 1-6.

  46. Khait OD. Controlling the chemical polishing process. Translated from Steko i Keramika. New York, NY. Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1970, pp. 133-137.

  47. Onisor I, Tomasso G, Krejci I. Micromorphology of ceramic etching pattern for two CAD-CAM and one conventional feldspathic porcelain and need for post-etching cleaning. Int J Esthet Dent. 2014; 1 (9): 54-69.

  48. Magne P, Cascione D. Influence of post-etching cleaning and connecting porcelain on the microtensile bond strength of composite resin to feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 96: 354-361.

  49. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ. Microstructure, composition, and etching topography of dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15: 159-167.

  50. Brentel AS, Özcan M, Valandro LF, Alarça LG, Amaral R, Bottino MA, Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to feldespathic ceramic after different etching and silanization regimens in dry and aged conditions. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 1323-1331.

  51. Dündar M, Özcan M, Gökce B, Cömlekoglu E, LEite F, Valandro LF. Comparison of two bond strength testing methodologies for bilayered all-ceramics. Dent Mater. 2007; 23 (23): 630-636.

  52. Menezes FC, Borges GA, Valentino TA, Olivera MA, Turssi CP, Correr-Sobrinho L. Effect of surface treatment and storage on the bond strength of different ceramic systems. Bra J Oral Sci. 2009; 8: 119-123.

  53. Phark JH, Duarte S Jr, Kahn H, Blatz MB, Sadan A. Influence of contamination and cleaning on bond strength of modified zirconia. Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 1541-1550.

  54. Yadav S, Upadhyay M, Borges GA, Roberts WE. Influence of ceramic (feldspathic) surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80: 765-770.

  55. Quaas AC, Yang B, Kern M. Panavia F 2.0 bonding to contaminated zirconia ceramic after different cleaning procedures. Dent Mater. 2007; 23: 506-512.

  56. Kukiattrakoon B, Thammasitboon K. Optimal acidulated phosphate fluoride gel etching time for surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain; on shear bond strength to resin composite. Euro J Dent. 2012; 6: 63-69.

  57. Melo RM, Valandro L, Bottino MA. Microtensile bond strength of a repair composite to leucite-reinforced feldspathic ceramic. Braz Dent J. 2007; 18: 314-319.

  58. Trakyali G, Malkondu O, Kazazoglu E, Arun T. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surface. Eur J Orthod. 2009; 31: 402-406.

  59. Steinhauser HC, Turssi CP, Franca FM, Amaral FL, Basting RT. Micro-shear bond strength and surface micromorphology of a feldspathic ceramic treated acid etching. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014; 22 (2): 85-90.

  60. Filho AM, Vieira LC, Araújo E, Monteiro Junior S. Effect of different ceramic surface treatments, on resin microtensile bond strength. J Prosthodont. 2004; 13 (1): 28-35.

  61. Söderholm KJ, Shang SW. Molecular orientation, of silane at the surface of colloidal silica. J Dent Res. 1993; 72 (6): 1050-1054.

  62. Barghi N. To silanate or not lo silanate: making a clinical decision. Compend Contin Educ Den. 2000; 21: 659-662, 664; quiz 666.

  63. Ishida H. Structural gradient in the silane coupling agent layers and its influence on the mechanical and physical properties of composites. In: Ishida H, Kumar G, editors. Molecular characterization of composite interfaces. New York: Plenum Press, 1985. pp. 25-50.

  64. Ishida H, Koening JL. A fourier-transform infrared spectroscopic study of the hydrolytic stability of silane coupling agents on E-glass fibers. J Polymer Sci, Polymer Physics. 1980; 18: 1931-1943.

  65. Schrader ME, Lerner I, D’Oria FG. Radioisotope study of coupling agents in reinforced plastics. Modern PLastics. 1967; 45: 195-282.

  66. Galip Gürel. The science and art of porcelain laminate veneers, Quintessence, 2003, Germany, 321-323.

  67. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29 (4): 211-221.

  68. Suh Bl. All bond -fourth generation dentin bonding system. J Esthet Dent. 1991; 3: 139-146.

  69. Appeldoorn RE, Wilwerding TM, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1993; 70: 6-11.

  70. Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent. 1988; 60: 288-291.

  71. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res. 1987; 66: 1460-1465.

  72. O’Brian WJ. Dental materials and their selection. Chicago: Quintessence; 2002. p. 75-90.

  73. Swank H, Bailey C, Motyka N, Vandewalle K. Bond strength of resin cement to lithium disilicate with pre-treatments. J Dent Res. 2016; 95 (Special issue A): Abstract 569.

  74. Chang B, Lawson N, Burgess J. Stability of silane to lithium disilicate in extreme environmental conditions. J Dent Res. 2016; 95 (Special issue A): Abstract 571.

  75. Heleba A, Hill T, Singhal S, McCabe P, Tysowsky G. Shear bond strength of ceramic primers with lithium disilicate. J Dent Res. 2016; 95 (Special Issue A): Abstract 1083.

  76. Tysowsky G, Heleba A, Hill T, Singhal S, McCabe P. Effect of Storage on Shear-bond Strength of Self-Etch Ceramic Primer. J Dent Res. 2016;95(Special issue A): Abstract 1067.

  77. Cömlekog lu ME, Dündar M, Güngör MA, Sen BH, Artunç C. Preliminary evaluation of titanium tetrafluoride as an alternative ceramic etchant to hydrofluoric acid. J Adhes Dent. 2009; 11: 447-453.

  78. Klosa K, Boesch I, Kern M. Long-term bond of glass ceramic and resin cement: evaluation of titanium tetrafluoride as an alternative etching agent for lithium disilicate ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 2013; 15: 377-383.

  79. Kato H, Matsumura H, Ide T, Atsuta M. Improved bonding of adhesive resin to sintered porcelain with the combination of acid etching and a two-liquid silane conditioner. J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28: 102-108.

  80. Kukiattrakoon B, Thammasitboon K. The effect of different etching times of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the shear bond strength of high-leucite ceramics bonded to composite resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98: 17-23.

  81. Kato H, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etching and sandblasting on bond strength to sintered porcelain of unfilled resin. J Oral Rehabil. 2000; 27: 103-110.

  82. Russell D, Meiers J. Shear bond strength of resin composite to Dicor treated with 4-META. Int J Prosthodont. 1994; 7: 7-12.

  83. Jin-H, DDS, MS, PhD. Bonding to silica-based glass-ceramics: a review of current techniques and novel self-etching ceramic primers. Journal. Quintessence publishing, 2016, pp. 27-36.

  84. Moncada G, Angel P. Parámetros para la evaluación de la estética dentaria antero superior. Revista Dental de Chile. 2008; 99 (3): 29-38.

  85. Claus-Peter E. Protocol adeziv de cimentare innovator. Reflect Magazine, Germany nr. 3/2015.

  86. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P et al. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J. 2005; 24 (1): 1-13.

  87. Perdigão J. New developments in dental adhesion. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51 (2): 333-357.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com