medigraphic.com

2017, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Esp Cienc Salud 2017; 20 (2)


Reflexión cognoscitiva y estrés agudo: un estudio experimental con dificultad metacognoscitiva

Tavizón SB, Velasco MPW, González JAI

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 63
Paginas: 30-39
Archivo PDF: 188.82 Kb.


RESUMEN

El propósito de este estudio fue conocer el efecto del estrés agudo (EA) sobre la reflexión cognoscitiva (RC) al utilizar la prueba de reflexión cognoscitiva modificada (CRT-M). Los datos recabados se compararon entre grupos experimentales y control mediante un análisis de varianza y entre sexos con una prueba t, comparando en todos los casos respuestas intuitivas, reflexivas correctas y reflexivas incorrectas. Los resultados indicaron que el grupo control sobresalió con respecto a los grupos experimentales, hubo mejoría en la RC ante el efecto del estrés sensorial y psicosocial, y se encontraron diferencias significativas entre hombres y mujeres en cuanto a RC; sin embargo, no hubo una diferencia significativa entre los grupos experimentales. Una posible explicación para estos resultados es que el efecto de disfluencia al que el CRT-M se expuso haya intervenido, por lo que futuras investigaciones deberían estudiar este fenómeno más profundamente.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Evans JSBT, Stanovich KE. Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013; 8: 223–241.

  2. Frankish K, Evans JSBT. The dualty of mind: an historical perspective. In: Evans JS, Frankish K, editors. In Two Minds Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009: 1–29.

  3. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013: 533

  4. Luo J, Yu R. Follow the heart or the head? The interactive influence model of emotion and cognition. Front Psychol. 2015; 6: 1–15.

  5. Oldrati V, Patricelli J, Colombo B, Antonietti A. The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in inhibition mechanism: A study on cognitive reflection test and similar tasks through neural modulation. Neuropsychologia. 2016; 91: 499-508

  6. Azadeh A, Zarrin M, Hamid M. A novel framework for improvement of road accidents considering decisionmaking styles of drivers in a large metropolitan area. Accid Anal Prev. 2016; 87: 17-33

  7. Witteman C, van den Bercken J, Claes L, Godoy A. Assessing rational and intuitive thinking styles. Eur J of Psychol Assess. 2009; 5: 39-47.

  8. Sirota M, Juanchich M, Hagmayer Y. Ecological rationality or nested sets? Individual differences in cognitive processing predict Bayesian reasoning. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 21: 198–204.

  9. Newstead SE, Handley SJ, Harley C, Wright H, Farrelly D. Individual differences in deductive reasoning. Q J Exp Psychol. 2004; 57: 33–60.

  10. Joseph VC, Schatz S. Modeling Sociocultural Influences on Decision Making. CRC Press. Florida, 2017: 546.

  11. Selye H. A Syndrome Produced by Diverse Nocuous Agents. Neuropsychiatry Class. 1936; 138: 32.

  12. Dhabhar FS, McEwen BS. Acute Stress Enhances while Chronic Stress Suppresses Cell-Mediated Immunity in Vivo: A Potential Role for Leukocyte Trafficking. Brain Behav Immun. 1997; 11: 286–306.

  13. Contrada R, Baum A. The Handbook of Stress Science: Biology, Psychology, and Health. The Handbook of Stress: Neuropsychological Effects on the Brain. New York: Springer publishing company, 2011: 47-63.

  14. Contrada R, Baum A. The Handbook of Stress Science: Biology, Psychology, and Health. The Handbook of Stress: Neuropsychological Effects on the Brain. New York: Springer publishing company, 2011: 87-100.

  15. Cannon WB. Organization for physiological homeostasis. Physiol Rev. 1929;9: 399–431.

  16. Contrada R, Baum A. The Handbook of Stress Science: Biology, Psychology, and Health. The Handbook of Stress: Neuropsychological Effects on the Brain. New York: Springer publishing company, 2011: 209-220.

  17. Contrada R, Baum A. The Handbook of Stress Science: Biology, Psychology, and Health. The Handbook of Stress: Neuropsychological Effects on the Brain. New York: Springer publishing company, 2011: 501-513

  18. Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR. The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: Some questions and answers. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9: 159–62.

  19. Bechara A, Damasio AR. The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games Econ Behav. 2005;52: 336–72.

  20. Dunn BD, Galton HC, Morgan R, Evans D, Oliver C, Meyer M, et al. Listening to your heart. How interoception shapes emotion experience and intuitive decision making. Psychol Sci. 2010;21: 1835–44.

  21. Dunn BD, Dalgleish T, Lawrence AD. The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30: 239–71.

  22. Oldrati V, Patricelli J, Colombo B, Antonietti A. The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in inhibition mechanism: A study on cognitive reflection test and similar tasks through neuromodulation. Neuropsychologia. 2016;91: 499–508.

  23. Morgado P, Sousa N, Cerqueira JJ. The impact of stress in decision making in the context of uncertainty. J Neurosci Res. 2015;93: 839–47.

  24. Øfsti L. Decision making: The significance of cognition, emotion, and impulsivity. 2011.

  25. Papaeconomou P. Individual differences & instance based decision making: Putting “bounded rationality” to the test. The University of Edinburgh. 2012.

  26. Pfister H-R, Jungermann H, Fischer K. Die Psychologie der Entscheidung. 4th ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 2017.

  27. van den Bos R, Homberg J, de Visser L. A critical review of sex differences in decision-making tasks: Focus on the Iowa Gambling Task. Behav Brain Res. 2013;238: 95–108.

  28. Lighthall NR, Mather M, Gorlick MA. Acute Stress Increases Sex Differences in Risk Seeking in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. PLoS One. 2009;4: 1–6.

  29. Porcelli AJ, Delgado MR. Acute stress modulates risk taking in financial decision making. Psychol Sci. 2009;20: 278–83.

  30. Luan S, Leontiev D, Takemura K, Keller N, Tan JH, Smithson M. Decision Making. In: International Journal of Psychology. 2016; 335–55.

  31. Hoffman R, Al’Absi M. The effect of acute stress on subsequent neuropsychological test performance. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19: 497–506.

  32. Lupien SJ, McEwen BS, Gunnar MR, Heim C. Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10: 434–45.

  33. Alexander JK, Hillier A, Smith RM, Tivarus ME, Beversdorf DQ. Beta-adrenergic Modulation of Cognitive Flexibility during Stress. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007;19: 468–78.

  34. Frederick S. Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. J Econ Perspect. 2005;19: 25-42

  35. Baron J, Scott S, Fincher K, Emlen Metz S. Why does the Cognitive Reflection Test (sometimes) predict utilitarian moral judgment (and other things)? J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2015;4: 265–84.

  36. Campitelli G, Gerrans P. Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach. Mem Cognit. 2014;42: 434–47.

  37. Toplak ME, West RF, Stanovich K. The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Mem Cognit. 2011;39: 1275–89.

  38. Reilly D. Gender, culture, and sex-typed cognitive abilities. PLoS One. 2012;7: 1–16.

  39. Liberali JM, Reyna VF, Furlan S, Stein LM, Pardo ST. Individual Differences in Numeracy and Cognitive Reflection, with Implications for Biases and Fallacies in Probability Judgment. J Behav Decis Mak. 2012;25: 361–81.

  40. Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang J a. Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition? Behav Res Methods. 2015;48: 341–8.

  41. Campitelli G, Labollita M. Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices. Judgm Decis Mak. 2010;5: 182–91.

  42. Toplak ME, West RF, Stanovich KE. Real-World Correlates of Performance on Heuristics and Biases Tasks in a Community Sample. J Behav Decis Mak. 2016;30: 541-554

  43. Corgnet B, Espín AM, Hernán-González R. Creativity and cognitive skills among Millennials: Thinking too much and creating too little. Front Psychol. 2016;7: 1–9.

  44. Morsanyi K, Busdraghi C, Primi C. Mathematical anxiety is linked to reduced cognitive reflection: a potential road from discomfort in the mathematics classroom to susceptibility to biases. Behav Brain Funct. 2014;10: 1–13.

  45. Toplak ME, West RF, Stanovich KE. Assessing miserly information processing: An expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Think Reason. 2014;20: 147–68.

  46. Primi C, Morsanyi K, Chiesi F, Donati MA, Hamilton J. The Development and Testing of a New Version of the Cognitive Reflection Test Applying Item Response Theory (IRT). J Behav Decis Mak. 2015;29: 453–69.

  47. Thomson KS, Oppenheimer DM. Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgm Decis Mak. 2016;11: 99–113.

  48. Bosch-Domènech A, Brañas-Garza P, Espín AM. Can exposure to prenatal sex hormones (2D:4D) predict cognitive reflection? Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;43: 1–10.

  49. Ring P, Neyse L, David-Barett T, Schmidt U. Gender Differences in Performance Predictions: Evidence from the Cognitive Reflection Test. Front Psychol. 2016;7: 1-7.

  50. Alter AL, Oppenheimer DM, Epley N, Eyre RN. Overcoming Intuition: Metacognitive Difficulty Activates Analytic Reasoning. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007;136: 569–76.

  51. Tinghög G, Andersson D, Bonn C, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, Koppel L, Västfjäll D. Intuition and Moral Decision-Making - The Effect of Time Pressure and Cognitive Load on Moral Judgment and Altruistic Behavior. PLoS One. 2016;11: 1-19.

  52. Dickerson SS, Kemeny ME. Acute Stressors and Cortisol Responses: A Theoretical Integration and Synthesis of Laboratory Research. Psychol Bull. 2004;130: 355–91.

  53. Ising H, C B. Acute and chronic endocrine effects of noise: Review of the research conducted at the Institute for water, soil and air hygiene. Noise Heal. 2000;2: 7–24.

  54. Spreng M. Central nervous system activation by noise. Noise Heal. 2000;2: 49–58.

  55. Kumar S, Forster HM, Bailey P, Griffiths TD. Mapping unpleasantness of sounds to their auditory representation. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;124: 3810– 7.

  56. Bigert C, Bluhm G, Theorell T. Saliva cortisol - A new approach in noise research to study stress effects. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2005;208: 227–30.

  57. Kahneman D, Frederick S. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics Biases Psychol Intuitive Judgm. 2002; 49–81.

  58. Simonovic B, Stupple EJN, Gale M, Sheffield D. Stress and Risky Decision Making: Cognitive Reflection, Emotional Learning or Both. J Behav Decis Mak. 2016; 30: 1–8.

  59. Kühl T, Eitel A. Effects of disfluency on cognitive and metacognitive processes and outcomes. Metacognition Learn. 2016; 11: 1–13.

  60. Spada MM, Nikčević A V., Moneta GB, Wells A. Metacognition, perceived stress, and negative emotion. Pers Individ Dif. 2008; 44: 1172–1181.

  61. Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014; 111: 8410– 8415.

  62. Shiffrin RM, Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84: 127–90.

  63. Duncko R, Johnson L, K M, C G. Working memory performance after acute exposure to the cold pressor stress in healthy volunteers. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2009; 91: 377–81.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com