medigraphic.com
ISSN 1025-0255 (Digital)

2017, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

AMC 2017; 21 (2)


Fractura del extremo proximal del húmero

Álvarez LA, García LYC

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 48
Paginas: 283-293
Archivo PDF: 451.09 Kb.


RESUMEN

Fundamento: la fractura del extremo proximal del húmero es una enfermedad traumática frecuente, en especial en pacientes que presentan osteoporosis de esta zona anatómica. El tratamiento puede ser conservador o quirúrgico, basado en factores propios del enfermo y del tipo de fractura.
Objetivo: profundizar los conocimientos sobre pacientes que sufren de fractura del extremo proximal del húmero debido a su alta incidencia en los servicios de urgencia.
Métodos: la búsqueda de la información se realizó en un periodo de un mes (septiembre) y se emplearon las siguientes palabras: fractures of the proximal humerus y shoulder trauma, a partir de la información obtenida se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de un total de 2023 artículos publicados en las bases de datos Pubmed, Hinari, SciELO y Medline mediante el gestor de búsqueda y administrador de referencias EndNote, de ellos se utilizaron 50 citas seleccionadas para realizar la revisión, 47 de ellas de los últimos cinco años, donde se incluyeron siete libros.
Desarrollo: se describe la acción de las fuerzas musculares deformantes, así como la clasificación más empleada en esta enfermedad, que los divides en partes. Se hace referencia a los estudios imaginológicos más empleados con especial énfasis en la radiografía convencional. Se describe el tratamiento de cada tipo de fractura basado en la clasificación y se exponen los factores pronósticos relacionados con la isquemia de la cabeza humeral.
Conclusiones: las fracturas del extremo proximal del húmero son lesiones frecuentes en especial en pacientes ancianos, debido a la osteoporosis de la zona afectada. El tratamiento conservador o quirúrgico depende de variables propias de cada enfermo y transita desde las modalidades conservadoras a las quirúrgicas.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Bell JE, Cadet ER. Shoulder trauma: bone. En: Cannada LK, editor. Orthopaedic knowledge up-date: 11. Illinois: Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2014. p. 319-26.

  2. Dean BJ, Jones LD, Palmer AJ, Macnair RD, Brewer PE, Jayadev C, et al. A review of current surgical practice in the operative treatment of proximal humeral fractures: Does the PROFHER trial demonstrate a need for change? Bone Joint Res. 2016 May;5(5):178-84.

  3. Egol KA, Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Handbook of fractures. 5 th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015.

  4. Bhat SB, Secrist ES, Austin LS, Getz CL, Krieg JC, Mehta S, et al. Displaced proximal humerus fractures in older patients: shoulder surgeons versus traumatologists. Orthopedics. 2016 May;39(3):e509-13.

  5. Zhang YK, Wei HW, Lin KP, Chen WC, Tsai CL, Lin KJ. Biomechanical effect of the configuration of screw hole style on locking plate fixation in proximal humerus fracture with a simulated gap: a finite element analysis. Injury. 2016 Jun;47(6):1191-5.

  6. Han RJ, Sing DC, Feeley BT, Ma CB, Zhang AL. Proximal humerus fragility fractures: recent trends in nonoperative and operative treatment in the Medicare population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Feb;25(2):256-61.

  7. Carbone S, Papalia M. The amount of impac-tion and loss of reduction in osteoporotic proxi-mal humeral fractures after surgical fixation. Os-teoporos Int. 2016 Feb;27(2):627-33.

  8. Iyer KM. The shoulder. En: Iyer KM, editor. Trauma management in Orthopedics. London: Springer; 2013. p. 18-21.

  9. Streubel PN, Sanchez Sotelo J, Stienmann SP. Proximal humeral fractures. En: Court Brown CM, Heckman JD, McQueen MM, Ricci WM, Tor-netta P, editors. Rockwood and Green's Fractu-res in Adults. 8 th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015. p. 1341-1426.

  10. Capriccioso CE, Zuckerman JD, Egol KA. Ini-tial varus displacement of proximal humerus fractures results in similar function but higher complication rates. Injury. 2016 Apr;47(4):909-13.

  11. Kim TI, Choi JH, Kim SH, Oh JH. The adequacy of diagnosis and treatment for osteo-porosis in patients with proximal humeral fractu-res. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016 Sep;8(3):274-9.

  12. Panchal K, Jeong JJ, Park SE, Kim WY, Min HK, Kim JY, et al. Clinical and radiological outco-mes of unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate and fibular strut allograft. Int Orthop. 2016 Mar;40(3):569-77.

  13. Kilian M, Zamborský R, Chandoga I, Budaj M, Vajczikova S. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures. Rozhl Chir. 2016 Feb;95(2):60-8.

  14. Krieg JC. Surgical and nonsurgical treatment produced similar outcomes for proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Nov;97(22):1890.

  15. Rabi S, Evaniew N, Sprague SA, Bhandari M, Slobogean GP. Operative vs non-operative ma-nagement of displaced proximal humeral fractu-res in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Orthop. 2015 Nov;6(10):838-46.

  16. Hertel R. Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:S65-72.

  17. Parada SA, Makani A, Stadecker MJ, Warner JJ. Technique of open reduction and internal fi-xation of comminuted proximal humerus fractu-res with allograft femoral head metaphyseal re-construction. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015 Oct;44(10):471-5.

  18. Smith CD, Booker SJ, Uppal HS, Kitson J, Bunker TD. Anatomy of the terminal branch of the posterior circumflex humeral artery: relevan-ce to the deltopectoral approach to the shoulder. Bone Joint J. 2016 Oct;98-B(10):1395-1398.

  19. Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractu-re: I classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970 Sep;52(6):1077-89.

  20. Launonen AP, Mattila VM. No differences bet-ween operative and non-operative treatments of proximal humerus fractures. Evid Based Med. 2016 Feb; 21(1):23.

  21. Stinner DJ, Streubel PN, Obremskey WT. Proximal humerus fracture. En: Sethi MK, Jahan-gir AA, Obremskey WT, editors. Orthopedic Trau-matology. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 103-28.

  22. Acklin YP, Michelitsch C, Sommer C. Elective implant removal in symptomatic patients after internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures improves clinical outcome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Mar;17:119.

  23. Hoel S, Jensen TG, Falster O, Ulstrup A. He-miarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture and consequences of a comminuted greater tu-bercle fragment. Musculoskelet Surg. 2016 Apr;100(1):9-14.

  24. Bouchet R, Block D, D'ollonne T, Gadea F, Gaillot J, Sirveaux F, et al. Non-operative treat-ment of four-part fractures of the proximal end of the humerus: results of a prospective and re-trospective multicentric study. Int Orthop. 2016 Aug;40(8):1669-74.

  25. Newton AW, Selvaratnam V, Pydah SK, Ni-xon MF. Simple radiographic assessment of bone quality is associated with loss of surgical fixation in patients with proximal humeral fractures. In-jury. 2016 Apr;47(4):904-8.

  26. Papakonstantinou MK, Hart MJ, Farrugia R, Gabbe BJ, Kamali Moaveni A van Bavel D, et al. Interobserver agreement of Neer and AO classifi-cations for proximal humeral fractures. ANZ J Surg. 2016 Apr;86(4):280-4.

  27. Von Keudell A, Vrahas MS, Weaver MJ. Sur-gical versus nonsurgical treatment of adults with displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: the PROFHER randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Apr;30(4):e143.

  28. Bockmann B, Buecking B, Franz D, Zettl R, Ruchholtz S, Mohr J. Mid-term results of a less-invasive locking plate fixation method for proxi-mal humeral fractures: a prospective observatio-nal study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Jul;16:160.

  29. Fattoretto D, Borgo A, Iacobellis C. The treatment of complex proximal humeral fractu-res: analysis of the results of 55 cases treated with PHILOS plate. Musculoskelet Surg. 2016 Aug;100(2):109-14.

  30. Steinhaus ME, Dare DM, Gulotta LV. Displa-ced proximal humerus fractures: is a sling as good as a plate? HSS J. 2016 Oct;12(3):287-90.

  31. Liu YW, Wei XE, Kuang Y, Zheng YX, Gu XF, Zhan HS, et al. Open vs. closed reduction combi-ned with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in humeral fractures. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016 Aug;25(4):215-21.

  32. Katthagen JC, Schwarze M, Warnhoff M, Voigt C, Hurschler C, Lill H. Influence of plate material and screw design on stiffness and ulti-mate load of locked plating in osteoporotic proxi-mal humeral fractures. Injury. 2016 Mar;47(3):617-24.

  33. Schliemann B, Seifert R, Rosslenbroich SB, Theisen C, Wähnert D, Raschke MJ, et al. Screw augmentation reduces motion at the bone-implant interface: a biomechanical study of lo-cking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractu-res. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Dec;24(12):1968-73.

  34. Vijayvargiya M, Pathak A, Gaur S. Outcome analysis of locking plate fixation in proximal hu-merus fracture. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Aug;10(8):RC01-5.

  35. Longo UG, Petrillo S, Berton A, Denaro V. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the ma-nagement of fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Surg. 2016 Aug;100(2):83-91.

  36. Stahl D, Fuente G de L. Reverse total shoul-der arthroplasty for a 4-part proximal humerus fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Aug;30 Suppl 2:S9-S10.

  37. Flanagin BA, Burns J, Larose C, Garofalo R, Fitzpatrick K, Krishnan SG. Arthroscopic greater tuberosity fracture repair. En: Ryu RKN, Angelo RL, Abrams JS, editors. The shoulder: AANA advance arthroscopic surgi-cal techniques. Thorofare: Slack Incorporated; 2016. p. 269-76.

  38. Aguado HJ, Mingo J, Torres M, Álvarez Ra-mos A, Martín Ferrero MA. Minimally invasive polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis for 3-4 part proximal humeral fractures: our institutional experience. Injury. 2016 Sep;47 Suppl 3:S22-S28.

  39. Arvesen JE, Gill SW, Sinatra PM, Eng M, Bledsoe G, Kaar SG. Biomechanical contribution of tension-reducing rotator cuff sutures in 3-part proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Aug;30(8):e262-6.

  40. Gardner MJ. Proximal humerus fracture pla-ting through the extended anterolateral ap-proach. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Aug;30 Suppl 2:S11-2.

  41. Kwak JY, Park HB, Jung GH. Accurate appli-cation of a precontoured-locking plate for proxi-mal humeral fractures in Asians: a cadaveric study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Oct;136(10):1387-93.

  42. Tenor Junior AC, Granja Cavalcanti AM, Albu-querque BM, Ribeiro FR, da Costa MP, Filho RB. Treatment of proximal humeral fractures using anatomical locking plate: correlation of functio-nal and radiographic results. Rev Bras Ortop. 2016 Apr;51(3):261-7.

  43. Koljonen PA, Fang C, Lau TW, Leung F, Cheung NW. Minimally invasive plate osteosynt-hesis for proximal humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015 Aug;23(2):160-3.

  44. Berkes MB, Little MT, Pardee NC, Schottel PC, Lazaro LE, Lorich DG. Outcomes of proximal humerus fracture open reduction internal fixation with concomitant ipsilateral shoulder girdle inju-ries: a case control study. HSS J. 2016 Jul;12(2):105-10.

  45. Chen H, Ji X, Zhang Q, Liang X, Tang P. Cli-nical outcomes of allograft with locking compres-sion plates for elderly four-part proximal hume-rus fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Jul;10:114.

  46. Kathrein S, Joeris A, Kralinger F, Blauth M, Goldhahn J. Significant differences between local reporting and central assessment of radiographic complications in a prospective, multicenter study about locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Oct;30(10):e336-9.

  47. Ueyama H, Yano K, Kanemura M, Gotani H, Ito S, Sakanaka H. Clinical outcomes and prog-nostic factors depending on implant design in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a re-trospective study. J Orthop. 2016 Jul;13(4):369-75.

  48. Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M. Predictor of humeral head ischemia after intra-capsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 Jul-Aug; 13(4):427-33.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com