medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial del Sistema Mexicano de Investigación en Psicología (SMIP)

2012, Número 2

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Mex Invest Psic 2012; 4 (2)


Investigación de traducción y análisis conductual aplicado: ¿Quién debe preocuparse?

Escobar R

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 45
Paginas: 112-120
Archivo PDF: 147.43 Kb.


RESUMEN

Recientemente se ha enfatizado el crecimiento de la investigación de traducción en el análisis de la conducta. Una razón es que, si bien el creciente interés por el análisis conductual aplicado ha favorecido el crecimiento mundial del análisis conductual, ha puesto en riesgo la supervivencia de la investigación básica. En México este problema se magnifica debido a que incluso el análisis conductual aplicado es repudiado por un número creciente de psicólogos. Por lo tanto, el desarrollo y difusión de la investigación tanto de traducción como aplicada es crucial para la supervivencia del análisis de la conducta en México.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Aparicio, C. (2012). On the future and direction of behavior analysis. Inside Behavior Analysis, 4(1). Recuperado de http:// www.abainternational.org/ABA/newsletter/IBAvol4iss1/ Aparicio.asp

  2. Arntzen, E. (2012). The future of behavior analysis. Inside Behavior Analysis, 4(1). Recuperado de http://www.abainternational. org/ABA/newsletter/IBAvol4iss1/Arntzen.asp

  3. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91-97.

  4. Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231–242.

  5. Baum, W. M. (2005). Understanding behaviorism: Behavior, culture, and evolution (2a Ed.), (pp. 229-230) Malden, MA: Blackwell.

  6. Branch, M. N. (2011). Is translation the problem? Some reactions to Critchfield (2011). The Behavior Analyst, 34, 19–22.

  7. Breckler, S. J. (2006). Psychology is translational science. Monitor on Psychology, 37, 6.

  8. Brown, J., & Rachlin, H. (1999). Self-control and social cooperation. Behavioral Processes, 47, 65-72.

  9. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2a Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Critchfield, T. S. (2011a). Translational contributions of the experimental analysis of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 3–17.

  10. Critchfield, T. S. (2011b). To a young basic scientist, about to embark on a program of translational research. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 137–148.

  11. Elliott, A. J., Morgan, K., Fuqua, R. W., Ehrhardt, K., & Poling, A. (2005). Self- and cross-citations in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior: 1993-2003. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 559-563.

  12. Escobar, R. (2011). De la vida cotidiana al laboratorio: Algunos ejemplos de investigación de traducción. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 37, 32-50.

  13. Escobar, R., & Lattal, K. A. (2011). Observing Ben Wyckoff: From basic research to programmed instruction and social issues. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 149-170.

  14. Friman, P. C. (2010). Come on in, the water is fine: Achieving mainstream relevance through integration with primary medical care. The Behavior Analyst, 33, 19–36.

  15. Hake, D. F., & Vukelich, R. (1972). A classification and review of cooperation procedures. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 3-16.

  16. Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272.

  17. Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.

  18. Iwata, B. A, Dorsey M. F, Slifer K. J, Bauman K. E, & Richman G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209. (Reimpreso de Iwata B.A, Dorsey M.F, Slifer K.J, Bauman K.E, Richman G.S. (1982). Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3-20).

  19. Jacobs, E. A., Borrero, J. C., & Vollmer, T. R. (2013). Operant translational applications of quantitative choice models. En G. J. Madden (Ed.), W. V. Dube, T. D. Hackenberg, G. P. Hanley, & K. A. Lattal (Eds. Asoc.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of behavior analysis, Vol. 2: Translating principles into practice (pp. 165-190). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  20. Lattal, K. A., St, Peter, C., & Escobar, R. (2013). Operant extinction: Elimination and generation of behavior. En G. J. Madden (Ed.), W. V. Dube, T. D. Hackenberg, G. P. Hanley, & K. A. Lattal (Eds. Asoc.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of behavior analysis, Vol. 2: Translating principles into practice (pp. 77-107). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  21. Lindsley, O. R. (1991). From technical jargon to plain English for application. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 449–458.

  22. Mace, F. C. (1994). Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 529–550.

  23. Mace, F. C., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Translational research in behavior analysis: Historical traditions and imperative for the future. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 293–312.

  24. Malott, R. W. (1992). Should we train applied behavior analysts to be researchers? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 83-88.

  25. MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95-107.

  26. Martínez, S. H. (2006). Treinta años de la Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta: Un reto a la supervivencia. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 24, 105-125.

  27. Michael, J. (1980). Flight from behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 3, 1–21.

  28. Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206.

  29. Michael, J. (2000). Implications and refinements of the establishing operation concept. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 401–410.

  30. Morales, S., & Santoyo, C. (2012). Resistencia al cambio de una conducta académica. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 38, 39-60.

  31. Neuringer, A. (2011). Reach out. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 27–29.

  32. Nevin, J. A., & Wacker, D. P. (2013). Response strength and persistence. En G. J. Madden (Ed.), W. V. Dube, T. D. Hackenberg, G. P. Hanley, & K. A. Lattal (Eds. Asoc.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of behavior analysis, Vol. 2: Translating principles into practice (pp. 109-128). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  33. Pierce, W. D., & Epling, W. F. (1980). What happened to analysis in applied behavior analysis? The Behavior Analyst, 3, 1–10.

  34. Pierce, W. D., & Epling, W. F. (1983). Choice, matching, and human behavior: A review of the literature. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 57–76.

  35. Poling A. (2010). Looking to the future: will behavior analysis survive and prosper? The Behavior Analyst, 33, 7-17.

  36. Rachlin H., & Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice, and self-control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 15-22.

  37. Reed, D. D., Skoch, J. J., Kaplan, B. A., & Brozyna, G. A. (2011). Defensive performance as a modulator of biased play calling in collegiate american-rules football. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 37, 51-57.

  38. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Londres, Inglaterra: Hutchinson.

  39. Santoyo, C. (1991). Modelos experimentales para el estudio de la conducta social humana. En V. A. Colotla (Comp.), La investigación del comportamiento en México (pp. 253-278). México: UNAM.

  40. Santoyo, C. (2012). Investigación traslacional: Una misión prospectiva para la ciencia del desarrollo y la ciencia del comportamiento. Revista Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología, 4(2), 84-110.

  41. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Nueva York, NY: Macmillan

  42. Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97.

  43. Sunahara, D., & Pierce, W. D. (1982). The matching law and bias in a social exchange involving choice between alternatives. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 7, 145-165.

  44. Vollmer, T. R., & Bourret, J. (2000). An application of the matching law to evaluate the allocation of two- and three-point shots by college basketball players. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 137–150.

  45. Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. Nueva York, NY: Columbia University Press.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com