medigraphic.com
ISSN 1870-199X (Impreso)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

2015, Número 4

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

Rev Odont Mex 2015; 19 (4)


Fotopolimerización de resinas compuestas a través de diversos espesores de tejido dental

Orozco BR, Álvarez GC, Guerrero IJ

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 33
Paginas: 222-227
Archivo PDF: 234.62 Kb.


RESUMEN

Objetivos: Determinar el espesor de tejido dental a través del cual se presente la fotopolimerización de la resina Prime Dent® con mínimo encogimiento y profundidad de curado adecuada. Método: Se obtuvieron 80 láminas de molares de 1, 2, 3 y 4 mm de espesor (20 por grupo). Se midió la contracción y se calculó el encogimiento de la resina polimerizando (Visilux 2, 3M) a través de cada lámina (60 s, 400 mW/cm2). Se utilizó la técnica de bonded-disc. Se realizaron pruebas de profundidad de curado, midiendo el espesor de resina polimerizada de acuerdo con la especificación No. 27 ADA. Un grupo control sin tejido dental fue preparado para ambas propiedades. Los datos fueron analizados usando ANOVA con prueba de Tukey (p ‹ 0.001). Resultados: Profundidad de curado: a medida que aumentó el espesor, ésta disminuyó, existiendo diferencia estadísticamente significativa en todos los grupos. El espesor que mostró menor encogimiento, cumpliendo con una profundidad de curado adecuada (ADA marca como valor mínimo, 1 mm) fue de 3 mm. Encogimiento: a medida que aumentó el espesor, éste disminuyó, no existiendo diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre los grupos de 2 y 3 mm. Conclusiones: De acuerdo con los resultados, es posible polimerizar a través de un espesor de 3 mm, por lo que no se recomienda polimerizar a través de un espesor de 4 mm. Es necesario obtener más propiedades mecánicas utilizando diferentes espesores de tejido dental.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Dauviller BS, Aarnts MP, Feilzer AJ. Modelling of the viscoelastic behavior of dental light-activated composites during curing. Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 277-285.

  2. Ferracane JL. Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerization. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 36-42.

  3. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent. 2004; 32: 109-115.

  4. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent. 1997; 25: 435-440.

  5. Bausch JR. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1982; 48: 59-67.

  6. Kemp-Scholte CM. Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in class V composite resin restorations. J Dent Res. 1988; 67: 841.

  7. Stansbury JW, Trujillo LM, Lu H, Ding X, Lin Y, Ge J. Conversion-dependent shrinkage stress and straining dental resins and composites. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 56-67.

  8. Álvarez-Gayosso C, Barceló-Santana F, Guerrero-Ibarra J, Sáez-Espínola G, Canseco-Martínez MA. Calculation of contraction rates due to shrinkage in light-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 228-235.

  9. Lai JH. Measuring polymerization shrinkage of photo-actived restorative materials by a water-filled dilatometer. Dent Mater. 1993; 16: 172-176.

  10. Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin layers. J Dent Res. 1989; 68: 48-50.

  11. Goldman M. Polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. Aust Dent Res. 1991; 10: 38-45.

  12. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW Jr. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Oper Dent. 1994; 19: 26-32.

  13. Lim BS, Ferracane JL, Sakaguchi RL, Condon JR. Reduction of polymerization contraction stress for dental composites by two-step light-activation. Dent Mater. 2002; 18: 436-444.

  14. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. Dent Mater. 1993; 9: 2-5.

  15. Suh BI. Controlling and understanding the polymerization shrinkage induced stresses in light-cured composites. Compend Cont Educ. 1999; 20 (Suppl. 25): S34-S41.

  16. Watts DC, Marouf AS, Al-Hindi AM. Photo-polymerization shrinkage-stress kinetics in resin-composites: methods develop­ment. Dent Mater. 2003; 19: 1-11.

  17. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composite with and without “soft-start-polymerization”. J Dent. 1997; 25: 321-330.

  18. Luo Y, Lo ECM, Wei SHY, Tay FR. Comparison of pulse activation versus conventional light-curing on marginal adaptation of a compomer conditioned using a total-etch or a self-etch technique. Dent Mater. 2002; 18: 36-48.

  19. Obici AC. Effect of the photo-activation method on polymerization shrinkage of restorative composites. Oper Dent. 2002; 27 (2): 192-198.

  20. Sakaguchi RL, Berge HX. Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent. 1998; 26: 695-700.

  21. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota P, Hayashi Y. The effect of light-curing modes on the microleakage of cervical resin composite restorations. J Dent. 2004; 32: 247-254.

  22. Munskgaard EC. Wall-to-wall polymerization contraction of composite resin versus filler content. Scand J Dent Res. 1987; 95: 526-531.

  23. Specification No. 27 for direct filling resins. Chicago, Il: American Dental Association; 1993.

  24. Porter EA. A transmission electron microscopy study of mineralization in age- induced transparent dentin. Biomaterials. 2005; 26: 7650-7660.

  25. Price RB, Bannerman RA. Effect of stepped versus continous light curing exposure on bond strengths to dentin. Am J Dent. 2000; 13 (3): 123-128.

  26. Silikas N, Eliades G, Watts DC. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. Dent Mater. 2000; 16: 292-296.

  27. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Boyer DB. Effect of composite type, light intensity, configuration factor and laser polymerization on polymerization contraction forces. Am J Dent. 1997; 10: 88-96.

  28. Ferracane JL, Mitchem JC. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in class V cavities. Am J Dent. 2003; 16: 239-243.

  29. Ferracane JL, Ferracane LL, Braga RR. Effect of admixed high-density polyethylene (HDPE) spheres on contraction stress and properties of experimental composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003; 66 (1): 318-323.

  30. Braga RR, Ferracane JL. Contraction stress related to degree of conversion and reaction kinetics. J Dent Res. 2002; 81: 114-118.

  31. Braga RR, Ferracane JL, Condon JR. polymerization contraction stress in dual-cure cements and its effect on interfacial integrity of bonded inlays. J Dent. 2002; 30: 333-340.

  32. Braga RR, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. In vitro wear simulation measurements of composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer luting cements for all-ceramic restorations. J Rest Esthet Dent. 2002; 14: 368-376.

  33. Braga RR, Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ. Contraction stress of flow-able composites and their efficacy as stress-relieving layers. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134: 721-728.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com