Mojena MG, Martín MA, Estévez ÁN, González GL, Núñez FR, González CN, Llanes EJR

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 16
Paginas: 38-48
Archivo PDF: 470.93 Kb.

RESUMEN

La revascularización miocárdica con injertos de derivación constituye uno de los métodos más utilizados en la actualidad para el tratamiento de la cardiopatía isquémica.La obtención de vena safena interna para su utilización como injerto aortocoronario, se ha realizado tradicionalmente con una o múltiples incisiones en muslo y pierna. Los avances tecnológicos que ha experimentado la cirugía cardiaca permiten hoy en día su obtención mediante una técnica endoscópica video asistido, mostrando ventaja sobre la técnica convencional en cuanto a morbilidad de la pierna y la calidad de vida del paciente.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Dacey L J. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic vein harvest-ing after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation; 2011. 123:147–153.

2. Carrasco Molina M A y col. Safenectomía video-asistida: Implementación de una nueva técnica quirúrgica en nuestro país. Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc; 2010. 16 (3): 292-99

3. Lopes R D. Endoscopic versus Open Vein-Graft Harvesting Endoscopic versus Open Vein-Graft Harvesting. The new england journal of medicine; 2009. 361 (3): 235-244.

4. Waqar-Uddin Z. A prospective audit of endoscopic vein har-vesting for coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2009. 91: 426–429.

5. Reed J F. Leg Wound Infections Following Greater Saphen-ous Vein Harvesting: Minimally Invasive Vein Harvesting Versus Conventional Vein Harvesting. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds; 2008. 7 (4): 210 - 219.

6. Chou N, Lee M, Wang S. Endoscopic vein harvest in elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2009. 10 (10): 748-752

7. Dacey L J. Endoscopic versus open vein-graft harvesting. N. Engl. J. Med; 2009. 361 (19): 1908.

8. Williams JB, et al. Association between endoscopic vs open vein-graft harvesting and mortality, wound complications, and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing cabg sur-gery. JAMA; 2012. 308(5):475-84.

9. Wang H et al. Initial Experience with Endoscopic Saphenous Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft ing in Chinese Patients. The Heart Surgery Forum; 2011. 14 (5) 291 - 296

10. Bilal H Kirmani, James B Barnard, Faisal Mourad, Nadene Blakeman, Karen Chetcuti and Joseph Zacharias.. Outcomes for Endoscopic versus Open Vein Harvest: a case control study. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery; 2010. 5:44.

11. Grant S W et al. What is the impact of endoscopic vein har-vesting on clinical outcomes following coronary artery by-pass graft surgery? Heart; 2012. 98 (1): 60-4.

12. Kossman, CE.. Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Associaton. Diseases of the heart and blood vessels: nomen-clature and criteria for diagnosis. 6th. Boston : Little-Brown; 1964. 110-4.

13. Wang S, Tang H, Wilkinson V, et al. Saphenous vein harvest with SaphLITE system versus conventional technique: a prospective, randomized study., Ann Thorac Surg; 2005. 79:2018 –2023.

14. Yun K L. Randomized trial of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: six-month paten-cy rates. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg; 2005. 129 (3): 496–503.

15. Andreasen JJ, Nekrasas V, Dethlefsen C. Endoscopic vs open saphenous vein harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008. 34:384–389.

16. Krishnamoorthy B et al. Closed suction drainage improves clinical outcome in patients undergoing endoscopic vein har-vesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg; 2012. 93 (4): 1201-5.