Rodríguez-Leyva JA, Nava-Bringas TI

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 19
Paginas: 117-121
Archivo PDF: 289.49 Kb.

RESUMEN

El «mapa de dolor» es un instrumento clínico que se utiliza en la valoración del paciente con dolor y permite plasmar las zonas afectadas en un esquema de la superficie corporal. Sus beneficios pueden resumirse en bajo costo, autoaplicabilidad, llenado breve, fácil comprensión, nula invasividad y comodidad para el enfermo. Su principal utilidad resulta de la capacidad de plasmar de manera objetiva la zona que aqueja a cada individuo. Este mapa es un buen recurso en el seguimiento de los pacientes con dolor de columna, e incluso es una herramienta viable en la evaluación de los tratamientos, aunque no se recomienda para la valoración del diagnóstico psicopatológico, en donde ha demostrado una limitada utilidad.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. IASP. Pain terms: a list with definitions and notes on usage. Recommended by the IASP subcommittee on Taxonomy. Pain. 1979; 6 (3): 249.

2. Serrano-Atero MS, Caballero J, Cañas A, García-Saura PL, Serrano-Álvarez C, Prieto J. Pain assessment (I). Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2002; 9: 94-108.

3. Serrano-Atero MS, Caballero J, Cañas A, García-Saura PL, Serrano-Álvarez C, Prieto J. Pain assesment (II). Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2002; 9: 109-121.

4. Schott, GD. The cartography of pain: The evolving contribution of pain maps. European Journal of Pain. 2010; 14: 784–791.

5. Carnes D, Ashby D, Underwood M. A systematic review of pain drawing literature. Clin J Pain. 2006; 22 (5): 449–457.

6. Ohnmeiss DD. Repeatability of pain drawings in a low back pain population. Spine. 2000; 25 (8): 980–988.

7. Pande KC, Tripathi S, Kanoi R. Limited clinical utility of pain drawing in assessing patients with low back pain. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005; 18 (29): 160-162.

8. Lacey RJ, Lewis M, Jordan K, Jinks C, Sim J. Interrater reliability of scoring of pain drawings in a self-report health survey. Spine. 2005; 30 (16): E455–E458.

9. Bertilson BC, Brosjö E, Billing H, Strender LE. Assessment of nerve involvement in the lumbar spine: agreement between magnetic resonance imaging, physical examination and pain drawing findings. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2010; 11: 202.

10. Murphy DR, Hurwitz EL, Gerrard JK, Clary R. Pain patterns and descriptions in patients with radicular pain: does the pain necessarily follow a specific dermatome? Chiropractic & Osteopathy. 2009; 17: 9.

11. Bogduk N. On the definitions and physiology of back pain, referred pain, and radicular pain. Pain. 2009; 147: 17-19.

12. Aina A, May S, Clare H. The centralization phenomenon of spinal symptoms—a systematic review. Manual Therapy. 2004; 9: 134-143.

13. Grunnesjö M, Bogefeld J, Blomberg S, Delaney H, Svärdsudd K. The course of pain drawings during a 10-week treatment period in patients with acute and sub-acute low back pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2006; 7: 65.

14. Andersen T, Christensen FB, Høy KW, Helmig P, Niedermann B, Hansen ES, Bünger C. The predictive value of pain drawings in lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Spine J. 2010; 10 (5): 372-9.

15. Sanders NW, Mann NH, Spengler DM. Pain drawing scoring is not improved by inclusion of patient-reported pain sensation. Spine. 2006; 31 (23): 2735–2741.

16. Ransford AO, Cairns D, Mooney V. The pain drawing as an aid to the psychologic evaluation of patients with low-back pain. Spine. 1976; 1 (2): 127-134.

17. Gordon W, McCulloch J, Kummel E, Venner R. Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain. Spine. 1980; 5 (2): 117–125.

18. Apeldoorn AT, Bosselaar H, Ostelo RW, Blom-Luberti T, Van der Ploeg T, Fritz JM et al. Identification of patients with chronic low back pain who might benefit from additional psychological assessment. Clin J Pain. 2012; 28 (1): 23-31.

19. Egloff N, Cámara R, von Känel R, Klingler N, Marti E, Gander ML. Pain drawings in somatoform-functional pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2012; 13: 257