medigraphic.com
ISSN 1029-3019 (Digital)

2013, Número 11

<< Anterior Siguiente >>

MediSan 2013; 17 (11)


Eficacia de los imanes permanentes multipolares en el tratamiento del dolor crónico en pacientes con osteoartrosis generalizada

Hechavarría SM, Gay MM, Hernández AC, Bergues CLE

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 20
Paginas: 8072-8081
Archivo PDF: 155.82 Kb.


RESUMEN

Se efectuó un estudio longitudinal y controlado de 100 pacientes con osteoartrosis generalizada, atendidos en el Servicio de Medicina Natural y Tradicional del Hospital Provincial Docente Clinicoquirúrgico “Saturnino Lora Torres” de Santiago de Cuba, desde enero hasta diciembre del 2010, a fin de evaluar la eficacia de los imanes permanentes multipolares en el tratamiento del dolor crónico en los afectados. Estos imanes se ubicaron y fijaron en diferentes puntos de acupunturas para aliviar la dolencia. Los niveles de dolor se cuantificaron mediante la Escala Visual Análoga, por sexo y rango de edades; se evaluaron a los 0, 30, 60 y 90 días durante la terapia. Se demostró la factibilidad del uso de los imanes permanentes multipolares en el alivio del dolor de los pacientes con osteoartrosis generalizada por ser simples, seguros, eficaces y no inducir efectos adversos en el organismo.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Lorenzo D. Intra-Articular Treatments Horizons in Osteoarthritis. J Arthritis. 2012;1:e101.

  2. Pavelka K, Uebelhart D. Efficacy evaluation of highly purified intra-articular hyaluronic acid (Sinovial®) vs hylan G-F20 (Synvisc®) in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. A double-blind, controlled, randomized, parallelgroup non-inferiority study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19(11):1294-300.

  3. Ernst E, White A. Life-threatening adverse reactions after acupuncture? A systematic review. Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 1999;6:24-8.

  4. Spezia Adachi LN, Caumo W, Laste G, Fernandes Medeiros L, Ripoll Rozisky J, de Souza A, et al. Reversal of chronic stress-induced pain by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in an animal model. Brain Res. 2012;1489:17-26.

  5. Xu S, Okano H, Tomita N, Ikada Y. Recovery effects of a 180 mT static magnetic field on bone mineral density of osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae in ovariectomized rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:620984.

  6. Kanai S, Taniguchi N, Okano H. Effect of Magnetotherapeutic Device on Pain Associated With Neck and Shoulder Stiffness. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine. 2011;17(6):44-8.

  7. Cameron HU. Electromagnetic therapy: fact or fiction. New Zealand J Physiotherapy. 2012;40(3):110-2.

  8. Kanai S, Taniguchi N. Efficacy of static magnetic field for pain of adjuvant arthritis rats. Adv in Biosc Biotech. 2012;3:511-5.

  9. Eckenwiler D, Feinholz C, Ells T, Schonfeld T. The Declaration of Helsinki through a feminist lens. Int J Feminist Appr to Bioethics. 2008;1:161-77.

  10. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). Magnets for Pain Relief. 2012 [citado 7 Oct 2013]. Disponible en:http://nccam.nih.gov/health/ magnet/magnetsforpain.htm

  11. Pittler MH, Brown EM, Ernst E. Static magnets for reducing pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. CMAJ. 2007;177(7):736–42.

  12. Richmond SJ, Brown SR, Campion PD, Porter AJ, Moffett JA, Jackson DA, et al. Therapeutic effects of magnetic and copper bracelets in osteoarthritis: a randomised placebo-controlled crossover trial. Complement Ther Med. 2009;17(5-6):249–56.

  13. Morris CE, Skalak TC. Acute exposure to a moderate strength static magnetic field reduces edema formation in rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;294(1):H50-7.

  14. Shen LK, Huang HM, Yang PC, Huang YK, Wang PD, Leung TK, et al. A static magnetic field attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced neuro-inflammatory response via IL-6-mediated pathway. Electromagn Biol Med. 2013 [citado 7 Oct 2013]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23781996

  15. Vergallo C, Dini L, Szamosvölgyi Z, Tenuzzo BA, Carata E, Panzarini E, et al. In vitro analysis of the anti-inflammatory effect of inhomogeneous static magnetic field-exposure on human macrophages and lymphocytes. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72374.

  16. Lin CT, Lee SY, Chen CY, Chen CA, Lin CP, Huang HM. Long-term continuous exposure to static magnetic field reduces popolysaccharide-induced cytotoxicity of fibroblasts. Int J Radiat Biol. 2008;84(3):219-26.

  17. Ross CL, Harrison BS. Effect of time-varied magnetic field on inflammatory response in macrophage cell line RAW 264.7. Electromagn Biol Med. 2013;32(1):59- 69.

  18. Mendonca ME, Santana MB, Baptista AF, Datta A, Bikson M, Fregni F, et al. Transcranial DC stimulation in fibromyalgia: optimized cortical target supported by high-resolution computational models. J Pain. 2011;12(5):610–7.

  19. Pascual-Leone F, Ferrucci R, Priori A, Boggio PS, Fregni F. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul. 2011;5(3):175–95.

  20. Laste G, Caumo W, Adachi LNS, Rozisky JR, Macedo IC, Filho PM, et al. Effect of trancranial direct current stimulation in hyperalgesia for chronic inflammation in rats. Exp Brain Res. 2012;221:75–83.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com