Hurtado LLM

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 10
Paginas: 7-8
Archivo PDF: 109.39 Kb.

FRAGMENTO

El cirujano interesado en la actualización siempre estará en busca de información; el saber leer, analizar e integrar la información a su práctica profesional diaria será de mucha utilidad; sin embargo, un problema que se debe sortear es ¿cómo saber si esta información es adecuada?

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Sackett DL. Evidence-based medicine and treatment choices. Lancet. 1997; 349: 570.

2. Siderowf AD. Evidence from clinical trials: can we do better? NeuroRx. 2004; 1: 363-71.

3. Thakur A, Wang EC, Chiu TT, Chen W, Ko CY, Chang JT, et al Methodology standards associated with quality reporting in clinical studies in pediatric surgery journals. J Pediatr Surg. 2001; 36: 1160-1164.

4. Jaeschke R, Guyatt G, Sackett DL. Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1994; 271: 389-391.

5. Gail MH. Statistics in Action. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1996; 91: 1-13.

6. Kurichi JE, Sonnad SS. Statistical methods in the surgical literature. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 202: 476-484.

7. Schein M, Paladugu R, Sutija VG, Wise L. What American surgeons read: a survey of a thousand Fellows of the American College of Surgeons. Curr Surg. 2000; 57: 252-258.

8. Jones TH, Hanney S, Buxton MJ. The journals of importance to UK clinicians: a questionnaire survey of surgeons. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006; 6: 24

9. Hall JC. The readability of original articles in surgical journals. ANZ J Surg. 2006; 76: 68-70

10. Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L. One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg. 2002; 26: 1099-1105.