medigraphic.com
Academia Mexicana de Neurología, A.C.

2012, Número 6

<< Anterior

Rev Mex Neuroci 2012; 13 (6)


La alianza terapéutica y el apego al tratamiento: metodología técnica en adicciones

Souza MM

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 57
Paginas: 324-330
Archivo PDF: 173.86 Kb.


RESUMEN

La alianza terapéutica, base del concepto de apego al tratamiento de cualquier actividad curativorehabilitatoria, enfrenta en adicciones diversos impedimentos que influyen al personal de salud, encargado de favorecer el éxito terapéutico de pacientes con patología adictiva y su comorbilidad. Se presenta una revisión sucinta de los elementos psicodinámicos que patentizan la importancia de los factores técnicometodológicos recomendados en la literatura, para enfrentar el abordaje satisfactorio de los mecanismos que restringen la práctica terapéutica con estos pacientes y sus familiares. Todos ellos, por sus características psicopatológicas se comportan de modo especial y requieren de abordajes mixtos más completos, bajo esquemas de manejo, evaluación y supervisión constante que favorezcan una mejor evolución a largo plazo. Limitados por su compleja condición de salud, los afectados y sus terapeutas habrán de consolidar las modificaciones que los habiliten a comprometerse y participar eficazmente. Los estilos de apego afectan la dinámica terapeuta-paciente, por lo que es tarea del profesional fomentar el desarrollo de una mejor participación y vigorizar el deseo de superación, dando ejemplo a la par, a quienes inician a formarse en asuntos terapéuticos. Este aprendizaje basado en la autovigilancia perpromueve la superación y facilita los complejos procesos del manejo.


REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

  1. Souza y Machorro M. Adicciones, psicopatología y psicoterapia. Rev Mex Neuroci 2004; 5: 57-69.

  2. Souza y Machorro M. Adicciones: clínica y terapéutica. México: Editorial Alfil; 2007.

  3. Souza y Machorro M. Obstáculos y recomendaciones para el tratamiento de abusadores/adictos a psicotrópicos. Rev Mex Neuroci 2009; 10: 350-9.

  4. Secretaría de Salud, SSA. Encuesta Nacional de Adicciones 2008. 1a. Ed. Secretariado Técnico del Consejo Nacional contra las Adicciones, CONADIC; Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública; Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz. México: Fundación Rio Arronte; 2008.

  5. Souza y Machorro M. El papel de la mitología popular, la semántica y la iatrogenia en las adicciones. Rev Mex Neuroci 2002; 2: 25-7.

  6. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss. Vol., 1 Attachment. New York: Basic Books; 1969.

  7. Mikulincer M, Florian V. The relationship between adult attachment styles and emotional and cognitive reactions to stressful events. In: Simpson J & Rholes S (eds.). Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: Guilford; 1998. p. 143-65.

  8. Waters E, Hamilton N, Weinfield C. The stability of attachment security from infancy to adolescence and early adulthood. Child Dev 2000; 71: 73-6.

  9. Hardy G, Aldridge J, Davidson C, Rowe C, Reilly S, Shapiro D. Therapist Responsiveness to Client Attachment Styles and Issues Observed in Client- Identified Significant Events in Psychodynamic-Interpersonal Psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research 1999; 9: 36-53.

  10. Leiper R, Casares P. An investigation of the attachment organization of clinical psychologists and its relationship to clinical practice. Brit J Medical Psychology 2000; 73: 449-64.

  11. Eames V, Roth A. Patient Attachment Orientation and the Early Working Alliance-A Study of Patient and Therapist Reports of Alliance Quality and Ruptures. Psychotherapy Research 2000; 10: 421-34.

  12. Muran JC. Self-Relations in the Psychotherapy Process. Washington: APA Books 2001.

  13. Stiles WB, Glick MJ, Osatuke K, Hardy GE, Shapiro DA, Agnew-Davies R, Rees A, et al. Patterns of alliance development and the rupture-repair hypothesis: Are productive relationships U-shaped or V-shaped. J. Counseling Psychology 2004; 51: 81-92.

  14. Anolli L, Balconi M. Adult attachment interview, thematic analysis, and communicative style in families with substance use disorder. Psychologial Reports 2002; 90: 279-99.

  15. Juffer F, Van Ijzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Intervention in transmission of insecure attachment: a case study. Psychological Reports 1997; 80: 531-43.

  16. De Roten Y, Gilliéron E, Despland J, Stigler M. Functions of Mutual Smiling and Alliance Building in Early Therapeutic Interaction. Psychotherapy Research 2002; 12: 193-212.

  17. Bowlby J. Secure Base Clinical applications of Attachment Theory (Collected Papers) London: Tavistock; 1988.

  18. Orlinsky DE, Ronnestad MH, Willutski U. Fifty years of psychotherapy processoutcome research: Continuity and change. In: M. J. Lambert (ed.). Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 5th. Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.

  19. Valdés SN. Consideraciones acerca de los estilos de apego y su repercusión en la práctica clínica. V Congreso Sudamericano de Investigación en Psicoterapia Empírica y III Encuentro Psicoterapéutico. Society for Psychotherapy Research; Comité de Psicoterapia de la Sociedad Chilena de Neurología, Psiquiatría y Neurocirugía. Sociedad Chilena de Psicología Clínica. Reñaca, Viña del Mar, Agosto 8-11, 2002.

  20. Macewan G. The efforts of therapists in the first session to establish a therapeutic alliance. Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts. Master of Sciences Thesis. Amherst; 2009, p. 66.

  21. Orlinsky DE, Ronnestad MH, Willutski U. Fifty years of psychotherapy processoutcome research: Continuity and change. In: Lambert MJ (ed.). Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. 5th. Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.

  22. Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davies MK. Relationship of Alliance with Outcome and Other Variables. 2000. J Clinical Physhol 2000; 68: 438-50.

  23. Knobloch-Fedders A, Lynne M, Pinsof WM. Therapeutic alliance and treatment progress in couple psychotherapy. J Marital Family Therapy 2007; 1: 129-35.

  24. Souza y Machorro M. La responsabilidad social de psicoterapeuta en adicciones. Rev Mex Neuroci 2009; 10: 9-10.

  25. Gelso CJ, Carter J. The relationship in counseling and psychotherapy: Components, consequences, and theoretical antecedents. Counseling Psychologist 1985; 13: 155-243

  26. Gelso CJ, Carter J. Components of the psychotherapy relationship: Their interaction and unfolding during treatment. J Counseling Psychology 1994; 41: 296-306.

  27. Gelso CJ, Samstag LW. A Tripartite Model of the Therapeutic Relationship. Handbook of Counseling Psychology. 4th. Ed. New York: Basic Books; 2008, p. 267-80.

  28. Gelso CJ, Hayes JA. The Psychotherapy Relationship: Theory, Research and Practice. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1998, pp. 22-46.

  29. Souza y Machorro M. Aspectos psicodinámicos y psicoterapia del paciente adicto. Evento Académico en Memoria del Dr. Erich Fromm. México: Instituto Mexicano de Psicoanálisis. A.C.; 2002, p. 29-30.

  30. Horvath AO, Luborsky L. The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. J Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1993; 61: 561-73.

  31. De Leon G. Therapeutic Communities for Addictions: A Theoretical Framework. Substance Use & Misuse 1995; 30: 1603-45.

  32. Connors C, Di Clemente R, Longabaugh YD. Substance Abuse Treatment and the Stages of Change: Selecting and Planning Interventions. New York: Guilford Substance Abuse Series; 2002.

  33. Horvath AO, Symonds BD. Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. J Counseling Psychology 1991; 38: 139-49.

  34. Luborsky L. Theories of Cure in Psychoanalytic Psychotherapies and the Evidence for Them. Psychoanal Inq 1996; 16: 257-64.

  35. Rait DS. The therapeutic alliance in couples and family therapy. Psychotherapy in Practice 2000; 56: 211-24.

  36. Balconi M, Anolli L. Adult attachment interview, thematic analysis, and communicative style in families with substance use disorder. Psychologial Reports 2002; 90: 299-303.

  37. Bifulco A, Moran PM, Ball C, Bernazzani O. Adult attachment style. I: Its relationship to clinical depression. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol 2002; 37: 50-9.

  38. Buchheim A, Strauss B, Kächele H. The differential relevance of attachment classification for psychological disorders. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie 2002; 52: 128-33.

  39. Weaver A, De Waal FB. An index of relationship quality based on attachment theory. J Comparative and Physiological Psychology 2002; 116: 93-106.

  40. Stiles WB, Glick MJ, Osatuke K, Hardy GE, Shapiro DA, Agnew-Davies R, Rees A, Barkham M. Patterns of alliance development and the rupture-repair hypothesis: Are productive relationships U-shaped or V-shaped. J. Counseling Psychology 2004; 51: 81-92.

  41. Martin DJ, Garske J, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables. Meta-analytic review. J Consulting Clinical Psychology 2000; 68: 438-50.

  42. Horvath AO, Greenberg L. The development of the Working Alliance Inventory: A research handbook. In Greenberg L, Pinsoff W (ed.). Psychotherapeutic Processes: A Research Handbook. New York: Guilford Press; 1986.

  43. Souza y Machorro M. Psiquiatría de las Adicciones. México: Editorial Fondo de Cultura Económica; 2010.

  44. Gaston L, Marmar CR. Manual for the California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales – CALPAS. Montreal, Canada: Department of Psychiatry McGill University; 1991.

  45. McGuire-Snieckus R, McCabe R, Catty J, Hansson L, Priebe S. A new scale to assess the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care: STAR. Scale To Assess Relationships. Psychological Medicine 2007; 37: 85-95.

  46. Carroll KM, Rachel CHN, Sifry L, Nuro KF, Frankforter TL, Ball SA, Fenton L, et al. A general system for evaluating therapist adherence and competence in psychotherapy research in the addictions. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2000; 57: 225-38.

  47. Beck J. Cognitive Therapy: Basics and Beyond. New York: Guilford Press; 1995.

  48. Safran JD, Muran JCH. Negotiating the Therapeutic Alliance: A Relational Treatment Guide. New York: Guilford Press; 2000.

  49. Gilmore JD, Lash SJ, Foster MA, Blosser MA. Adherence to Substance Abuse Treatment: Clinical Utility of Two MMPI-2 Scales. J Personality Assessment 2000; 77: 524-40.

  50. Meier PS, Barrowclough CH, Donmall MC. The role of therapeutic alliance in the treatment of substance misuse: a critical review of the literature. Addiction 2004; 100: 304-16.

  51. Krupnick JL, Sotsky SM, Simmens S, Moyer J, Elkin I, Watkins J, Pilkonis PA. The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: Findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. J Consulting Clinical Psychology 1996; 64: 532-53.

  52. Volpicelli JR, Petinatti HM, McLellan AT, O’Brien CHP. Combining medication and psychosocial treatments for addictions: BRENDA Model. New York: Guilford Press; 2001.

  53. Glazer SS, Galanter M, Megwinoff O, Dermatis H, Keller DS. The Role of Therapeutic Alliance in Network Therapy: A Family and Peer Support-Based Treatment for Cocaine Abuse. Substance Abuse 2003; 24: 93-100.

  54. O’Brien CHP. Evidence-based treatments of addiction. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society. Biological Sciences 2008; 363: 3277-86.

  55. McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O’Brien CHP, Kleber HD. Drug Dependence, a Chronic Medical Illness. Implications for Treatment, Insurance, and Outcomes Evaluation JAMA 2000; 284: 1689-95.

  56. Dunn J. Lead Consultant in Substance Misuse. Adherence to substitute opioid prescribing: survey of inner-London drug services. Psychiatric Bulletin The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2009; 33: 336-340.

  57. Morgenstern J, Neighbors CHJ, Kuerbis A, Riordan A, Blanchard KA, McVeigh KH, et al. Improving 24-Month Abstinence and Employment Outcomes for Substance-Dependent Women Receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families With Intensive Case Management. Am J Public Health 2009; 99: 328-33.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com