Pulido RMA, Calzada MJL

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 39
Paginas: 296-301
Archivo PDF: 41.68 Kb.

RESUMEN

A pesar de que el Análisis Experimental de la Conducta y las neurociencias, colaboran de manera estrecha en los Estados Unidos y en Europa, en México el trabajo interdisciplinario entre ambas disciplinas es aún escaso. En este trabajo se señalan las congruencias epistemológicas entre ambas disciplinas. También se describen algunos modelos experimentales que pueden resultar útiles para el trabajo de los neurocientíficos. Específicamente se presentan los modelos de: Adquisición con demora, Elección bajo programas concurrentes y Discriminación temporal.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Boring EG. A History of Experimental Psychology. New York: Aplleton- Century Crofts; 1950.

2. Kantor JR. The aim and progress of psychology and other sciences. Chicago: Principia Press; 1971.

3. Dews, P.B. Studies on Behavior. Differential sensitivity to pentobarbital of pecking performance in pigeons depending on the schedule of reward. J Pharmacol Experimental Therap 1955; 113: 393-401.

4. Morse WH, Herrnstein RJ. Effects of drugs on characteristics of behavior maintained by complex schedules of intermittent positive reinforcement. Ann New York Acad Sci 1956; 65: 303-17.

5. Garcia J, Koelling RA. Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. 1966; 4: 123-4.

6. Miller NE. Biofeedback and visceral learning. Annual Rev Psychol 1978; 29: 373-404.

7. Timberlak W, Schaal DW, Steinmetz JE. Relating behavior and neuroscience: Introduction and synopsis. J Experimental Anal Beh 2005; 84: 305-11.

8. Bratcher NA, Farmer-Dougan V, Dougan JD, Heidenreich BA, Garris PA. The role of dopamine in reinforcement: Changes in reinforcement sensitivity induced by D1-type, D2-type and nonselective dopamine receptor agonists. J Experimental Anal Beh 2005; 84: 371-99.

9. Villareal RP, Steinmetz JE. Neuroscience and learning: Lessons from studying the involvement of a region of cerebellar cortex in eye blink classical conditioning. JExperimental Anal Beh 2005; 84: 631-52.

10. Aparicio CF, Velasco F, Balderrama J. Haloperidol, elección y requisito de respuesta de cambio. Suma Psicológica 2004; 11: 181-204.

11. Antón B, Leff P. A novel bivalent morphine/heroin vaccine that prevents relapse to heroin addiction in rodents. Vaccine 2006; 24: 3232-40.

12. Buckley KW. Mechanical man: John Broadus Watson and the Beginnings of Behaviorism. New York: The Guilford Press; 1989.

13. Todd JT, Morris EK. Modern Perspectives on John B. Watson and Classical Behaviorism. New York: Green Wood Press; 1994.

14. Skinner BF. Can psychology be a science of the mind? American Psychologist 1990; 45: 1206-10.

15. Ferster CB. Skinner BF. Schedules of reinforcement. Boston: Prentice-Hall; 1957.

16. Lejeune H, Wearden JH. The comparative psychology of fixed interval responding: Some quantitative analyses. Learning and Motivation 1991; 22: 84-111.

17. Hoyert MS. Order and chaos in fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Experimental Anal Beh 1992; 57: 339-63.

18. Baron A, Leinenweber A. Molecular and molar analyses of fixed-interval performance. J Experimental Anal Beh 1994; 61: 11-8.

19. Lattal KA, Gleeson S. Response acquisition with delayed reinforcement. J Experimental Psychol. Animal Behavior Processes 1990; 16: 27-39.

20. Lattal KA, Metzger B. Response acquisition by Siamese fighting fish. J Experimental Anal Beh 1994; 61: 35-44.

21. Galuzca CM, Woods JH. Acquisition of cocaine self-administration with unsignaled delayed reinforcement in rhesus monkeys. J Experimental Anal Beh 2005; 84: 269-80.

22. Pulido M, Paz M, Sosa R. The effects of behavioral history on response acquisition with delayed reinforcement: A parametric analysis. Rev Mex Anál Cond 2008; 34: 43-56.

23. Skinner BF. A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist 1956; 11: 221-3.

24. Le Sage MG, Byrne T, Poling A. Effects of d-amphetamine on response acquisition with immediate and delayed reinforcement. J Experimental Anal Beh 1996; 66: 349-67.

25. Herrnstein RJ. Relative and absolute strength of a response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Experimental Anal Beh 1961; 4: 267-72.

26. Baum WM. Choice in the rat as a function of probability and amount of reward. Doctoral dissertation: Harvard University; 1966.

27. Heyman GM, Herrnstein RJ. More on concurrent interval-ratio schedules: A replication and review. J Experimental Anal Behavior 1986; 46: 331-51.

28. De Villers PA. Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In Honig WK, Staddon JER (Eds.). Handbook of operant behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1977: p. 233-87.

29. Baum WM. Matching, undermatching and overmatching in studies of choice. J Experimental Anal Beh 1979; 32: 269-81.

30. Williams BA. Reinforcement, choice and response strength. In Atkinson RC, Herrnstein RJ, Lindzey G, Luce RD (Eds.). Stevens handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley; 1988: 167-244.

31. Baum WM. On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. J Experimental Anal Beh 1974; 22: 231-42.

32. Todorov JC, Castro JM. Hanna E, Bittencourt de Sa MC, Barreto MQ. Choice, experience and the generalized matching law. J Experimental Anal Beh 1983; 40: 99-111.

33. Pulido M. Igualación en pacientes con Alzheimer. Trabajo Presentado en el XIII Congreso Mexicano de Análisis de la Conducta. Veracruz. 26 de junio 1996.

34. Dews PB. Studies on responding under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement II. The scalloped pattern of the cumulative record. J Experimental Anal Beh 1978; 29: 67-75.

35. Cumming WW, Schoenfeld WN. Behavior under extended exposure to high value fixed-interval reinforcement schedules. J Experimental Anal Beh 1958; 1: 245-63.

36. Catania AC. Reinforcement schedules and the psychophysical judgments: A study of some temporal properties of behavior. In Schoenfeld WN (Ed.). The theory of reinforcement schedules. New York: Aplleton-Century-Crofts; 1970: p. 1-42.

37. Roberts S. Isolation of an internal clock. J Experimental Psychol: Animal Behavior Processes 1981; 7: 242-68.

38. Mechner F, Guevrekian L. Effects of deprivation upon counting and timing in the rat. J Experimental Anal Beh 1962; 6: 463-6.

39. Machado A, Malheiro MT, Erlhagen W. Learning to time: A perspective 2009; 92: 423-58.