2011, Número 1
<< Anterior Siguiente >>
Rev Mex Invest Psic 2011; 3 (1)
Evaluación del efecto de resistencia al cambio en un procedimiento de consecuencias diferenciales
Mateos R, Cabrera R, García-Leal Ó, Flores C
Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 18
Paginas: 36-43
Archivo PDF: 329.59 Kb.
RESUMEN
Se evaluó el efecto de la demora de reforzamiento y de la demora entre una señal condicional (SC) y la oportunidad para responder en una tarea de discriminación condicional con consecuencias diferenciales. Se observó una menor proporción de cambio del índice de discriminación ante los ensayos correlacionados con una menor frecuencia de reforzamiento cuando se introdujo la demora entre la SC y la oportunidad para responder. No se observaron cambios consistentes en el índice de discriminación cuando se introdujo la demora de reforzamiento. Los hallazgos se discuten con base en los efectos de tiempo relativo y resistencia al cambio.
REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)
DeLong, R. E. & Wasserman, E. (1981). Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching to sample performance in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 394-412.
Grant, D. (1975). Proactive interference in pigeon short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 207-220.
Kruse, J. M. & Overmier, J. B. (1982). Anticipation of reward omission as a cue for choice behavior. Learning and Motivation, 13, 505-525.
Mace, F. C., Lalli, J. S., Shea, M. C., Lalli, E. P., Pinter, E., West, B. J., Roberts, M. & Nevin, J. A. (1990). The momentum of human behavior in a natural setting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 163-172.
Maki, W. S., Moe, J. C. & Bierly, C. M. (1977). Short-term memory for stimuli, responses, and reinforcers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 156- 177.
Nevin, J. A. (1974). On the form of the relation between response rates in a multiple schedule. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 237-248.
Nevin, J. A. & Grace, R. C. (2000). Behavioral momentum and the law of effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 73-130.
Nevin, J. A., Mandell, C. & Atak, J. R. (1983). The analysis of behavioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39 ,49-59.
Nevin, J. A., Milo, J., Odum, A. L. & Shahan, T. A. (2003). Accuracy of discrimination, rate of responding, and resistance to change. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 79, 307-321.
Odum, A. L., Shahan, T. A. & Nevin, J. A. (2005). Resistance to change of forgetting functions and response rates. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 65-75.
Roberts, W. A. & Kraemer, P. J. (1982). Some observations of the effects of intertrial interval and delay on delayed matching to sample in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 8, 342-353.
Santi, A. (1989). Differential outcome expectancies and directed forgetting effects in pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 17, 349-354.
Santi, A. & Savich, J. (1985). Directed forgetting effects in pigeons: Remember cues initiate rehearsal. Animal Learning & Behavior, 13, 365-369.
Schaal, D. W., Schuh, K. J. & Branch, M. N. (1992). Key pecking of pigeons under variable interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: Effects of variable-interval value. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 277- 286.
Shahan, T. A. & Lattal, K. A. (2005). Unsignaled delay of reinforcement, relative time, and resistance to change. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 83, 201- 219.
Urcuioli, P. J. (1990a). Differential outcomes and many-to-one matching: Effects of correlation with correct choice. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 410-422.
Urcuioli, P. J. (1990b). Some relationships between outcome expectancies and sample stimuli in pigeons delayed matching. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 302-314.
Williams, B. (1998). Relative time and delay of reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 29, 236-248.