Álvarez LA, García LY, Delgado CRM

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 31
Paginas: 128-138
Archivo PDF: 188.76 Kb.

RESUMEN

Fundamento: la gonartrosis primaria constituye una de las enfermedades que demanda la atención cada vez mayor del personal médico a todos los niveles de salud, por lo que se hace necesaria la aplicación de escalas que permitan conocer la efectividad de las diferentes terapéuticas.
Objetivo: validar la escala clínica propuesta por los autores.
Método: para la validación se aplicó el método de Delphy, participaron 17 expertos, de ellos 14 son especialistas en Ortopedia y Traumatología, un reumatólogo y dos rehabilitadores. El promedio de años de experiencia profesional de los expertos fue de 18,3 años. De los profesionales consultados uno es Doctor en Ciencias y 12 tienen categoría de Máster, por otra parte seis son especialistas de segundo grado, dos son profesores titulares y cuatro son auxiliares. Los expertos fueron consultados en cuanto a diseño, factibilidad y pertinencia de la escala para pacientes con gonartrosis primaria.
Resultados: se mostraron los valores correspondientes a la matriz de frecuencias absolutas, matriz de frecuencias acumuladas, matriz de frecuencias relativas acumuladas y matriz indicativa de los puntos de corte.
Conclusiones: la escala propuesta tiene las características de ser sencilla, aplicable y reproducible además de estar basada en los aspectos más importantes encontrados en pacientes con gonartrosis primaria.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. St Sauver JL, Warner DO, Yawn BP, Jacobson DJ, McGree ME, Pankratz JJ, et al. Why patients visit their doctors: assessing the most prevalent conditions in a defined American population. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Jan;88(1):56-67.

2. Fejer R, Ruhe A. What is the prevalence of musculoskeletal problems in the elderly population in developed countries? A systematic critical literature review. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012 Sep;20(1):31.

3. Rosenthal PB. Knee Osteoarthritis. En: Scott WN, editor. Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee. 5 th ed. Philadelphia: ELSEVIER Inc; 2012. p. 718-21.

4. Neogi T, Zhang Y. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2013 Feb;39(1):1-19.

5. Boyan BD, Tosi L, Coutts R, Enoka R, Hart DA, Nicolella DP. Sex differences in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Oct;20(10):668-9.

6. Marhadour T, Guellec D, Saraux A, Devauchelle-Pensec V, Jousse-Joulin S, Cornec D. Osteoarthritis epidemiology and risk factors. Soins. 2012 Sep;768:28-9.

7. Reyes Llerena GA, Guibert Toledano M, Penedo Coello A, Pérez Rodríguez A, Báez Dueñas R, Charnicharo Vidal R, et al. Community based study to estimates prevalence and burden of illness of rheumatic diseases in Cuba: A COPCORD study. J Clinical Rheumatol. 2009 March;15(2):51-5.

8. Pollard B, Johnston M, Dixon D. Exploring differential item functioning in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec;13(1):265.

9. Bruyere O, Ethgen O, Neuprez A, Zégels B, Gillet P, Huskin JP, et al. Health-related quality of life after total knee or hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a 7-year prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Nov;132(11):1583-7.

10. Engelhart L, Nelson L, Lewis S, Mordin M, Demuro-Mercon C, Uddin S, et al.

11. Validation of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales for patients with articular cartilage lesions of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2264-72.

12. Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S208-28.

13. Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes. J Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Mar;13(1):1-6.

14. Baker JF, Solayar GN, Byrne DP, Moran R, Mulhall KJ. Analgesic control and functional outcome after knee arthroscopy: results of a randomized double-blinded trial comparing a hyaluronic acid supplement with bupivacaine. Clin J Sport Med. 2012 Mar;22(2):109-15.

15. Hmamouchi I, Allali F, Tahiri L, Khazzani H, Mansouri LE, Ali Ou Alla S, et al. Clinically important improvement in the WOMAC and predictor factors for response to non-specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritic patients: a prospective study. BMC Res Notes. 2012 Jan;5:58.

16. Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sport Med. 1982 May-Jun;10(3):150-4.

17. Hsieh RL, Lo MT, Lee WC, Liao WC. Therapeutic effects of short-term monochromatic infrared energy therapy on patients with knee osteoarthritis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Sep;42(11):947-56.

18. Kohn L, Sauerschnig M, Iskansar S, Lorenz S, Meidinger G, Imhoff AB, et al. Age does not influence the clinical outcome after high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Jan;21(1):146-51.

19. Koh YG, Choi YJ. Infrapatellar fat pad-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy for knee osteoarthritis. Knee. 2012 Dec;19(6):902-7.

20. Lee YC. Effect and treatment of chronic pain in inflammatory arthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2013 Jan;15(1):300.

21. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;248:15-9.

22. Candebat RC. Examen clínico en Ortopedia y Traumatología. En: Cambras RA, editor. Tratado de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología. La Habana: Editorial Pueblo y Educación; 1985. p. 36.

23. Barber Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW. Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;27(4):402-6.

24. Alnahdi AH, Zeni JA, Snyder-Mackler L. Muscle impairments in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Sports Health. 2012 Jul;4(4):284-92.

25. Rutherford DJ, Hubley-Kozey CL, Stanish WD. Knee effusion affects knee mechanics and muscle activity during gait in individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Sep;20(9):974-81.

26. Fitzgerald GK, White DK, Piva SR. Associations for change in physical and psychological factors and treatment response following exercise in knee osteoarthritis: an exploratory study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Nov; 64(11):1673-80.

27. Villadsen A, Roos EM, Overgaard S, Holsgaard-Larsen A. Agreement and reliability of functional performance and muscle power in patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 May;91(5):401-10.

28. Williams VJ, Piva SR, Irrgang JJ, Crossley C, Fitzgerald GK. Comparison of reliability and responsiveness of patient-reported clinical outcome measures in knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Aug;42(8):716-23.

29. Zhang XH, Li SC, Xie F, Lo NN, Yang KY, Yeo SJ, et al. An exploratory study of response shift in health-related quality of life and utility assessment among patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total knee replacement surgery in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Value Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1 Suppl):S72-8.

30. Coleman S, Briffa NK, Carroll G, Inderjeeth C, Cook N, McQuade J. A randomised controlled trial of a self-management education program for osteoarthritis of the knee delivered by health care professionals. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012 Jan;14(1):R21.

31. Peer MA, Lane J. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): A Review of Its Psychometric Properties in People Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(1):20-8.